Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Using imcc as JIT optimizer
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Daniel Grunblatt  
View profile  
 More options Feb 20 2003, 7:48 pm
Newsgroups: perl.perl6.internals
From: dan...@grunblatt.com.ar (Daniel Grunblatt)
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 21:30:23 -0300
Local: Thurs, Feb 20 2003 7:30 pm
Subject: Re: Using imcc as JIT optimizer
On Thursday 20 February 2003 18:14, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Tupshin Harper wrote:
> > Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >> Starting from the unbearable fact, that optimized compiled C is still
> >> faster then parrot -j (in primes.pasm)

> > Lol...what are you going to do when somebody comes along with the
> > unbearable example of primes.s(optimized x86 assembly), and you are
> > forced to throw up your hands in defeat? ;-)

> It only may be equally fast, that's it :)

Nahh, you know it can be faster... may be in a couple of years ;-D

> > Cool idea, if I understand correctly, and I am in awe of how fast the
> > bloody thing is already.

> That's integer/float only. When it comes to objects, different things
> matter.

> > -Tupshin

> leo


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.