Dan Sugalski wrote:After the bugfix in perlarray.pmc I can bring you new numbers, which are
> At 10:44 AM +0200 7/28/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> 2) Some Mops numbers, all on i386/linux Athlon 800, slightly shortend:
not that abysmal.
Changing the while loop in mops.p6 to:
(which is more correct, comparing to e.g. mops.pl)
$ time perl6 -Rj mops.p6
We have already the same Mops as perl5, but additionaly 2.3 seconds
Without jit, mops.p6 performs at 0.8 Mops.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.