Proposed patch

[Mark J. Reed]

Currently compilation fails on OS X with gcc/g++, because "-bundle" as the
first argument gets interpreted as a request to run the "undle" version of
the compiler. It works fine as a later argument, so there's no need to
break compatibility with the Apple compiler:

Index: config/init/hints/darwin.pm
===================================================================
--- config/init/hints/darwin.pm (revision 14355)
+++ config/init/hints/darwin.pm (working copy)
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
link => 'c++',
ld => 'c++',
ld_share_flags => '-dynamiclib -undefined suppress',
- ld_load_flags => '-bundle -undefined suppress',
+ ld_load_flags => '-undefined suppress -bundle',
memalign => 'some_memalign',
has_dynamic_linking => 1,
# XXX when built against a dynamic libparrot installable_parrot
records

--
Mark J. Reed <mark...@mail.com>

[Mark J. Reed]

Whups, sorry, I meant to say "OS X 10.3", with its gcc (3.3). I agree that
it seems to build fine on Tiger.

On 8/30/06, Will Coleda <wi...@coleda.com> wrote:
>
> What version of OSX and gcc are you using? I haven't seen this
> problem on 10.4.7 PPC with gcc 4.0.1.
>
> Did it just break recently??
>
> Not that I see any problem applying this patch, regardless.

> --
> Will "Coke" Coleda
> wi...@coleda.com

[Will Coleda]

What version of OSX and gcc are you using? I haven't seen this
problem on 10.4.7 PPC with gcc 4.0.1.

Did it just break recently??

Not that I see any problem applying this patch, regardless.

On Aug 30, 2006, at 4:55 PM, Mark J. Reed wrote:

--
Will "Coke" Coleda
wi...@coleda.com