Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

[perl #41576] [BUG] t/pmc/pmethod_test.t fails on x86_64

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Patrick R . Michaud

unread,
Feb 22, 2007, 10:05:31 AM2/22/07
to bugs-bi...@rt.perl.org
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #41576]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# <URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41576 >


I get a failure in t/pmc/pmethod_test.t when running on
my system (x86_64). This is from a fresh checkout (r17147)
and build (perl Configure.pl; make):

$ prove t/pmc/pmethod_test.t
t/pmc/pmethod_test....ok 1/2
# Failed test (t/pmc/pmethod_test.t at line 36)
t/pmc/pmethod_test....NOK 2/2# got: 'test_method0
# 1
# test_method1
# 1,2,3,4,5,6
# test_method2
# 0, 0, ResizablePMCArray [ ]
# test_method2
# 1, 1, ResizablePMCArray [ ]
# test_method2
# 1, 1, ResizablePMCArray [ 2 ]
# test_method2
# 1, 1, ResizablePMCArray [ 2, 3 ]
# test_method2
# 101, 1, ResizablePMCArray [ ]
# '
# expected: 'test_method0
# 1
# test_method1
# 1,2,3,4,5,6
# test_method2
# 0, 0, ResizablePMCArray [ ]
# test_method2
# 1, 1, ResizablePMCArray [ ]
# test_method2
# 1, 1, ResizablePMCArray [ 2 ]
# test_method2
# 1, 1, ResizablePMCArray [ 2, 3 ]
# test_method2
# 101, 1, ResizablePMCArray [ ]
# BACK - 1000 - KEVIN -
# '
# './parrot "/home/pmichaud/parrot/trunk/t/pmc/pmethod_test_2.pir"' failed with exit code [SIGNAL 11]
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 2.
t/pmc/pmethod_test....dubious
Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
DIED. FAILED test 2
Failed 1/2 tests, 50.00% okay
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/pmc/pmethod_test.t 1 256 2 1 2
Failed 1/1 test scripts. 1/2 subtests failed.
Files=1, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.10 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.13 CPU)
Failed 1/1 test programs. 1/2 subtests failed.
$

Others have reported that this test succeeds under OSX and x86
linux, thus I think the bug may be x86_64 related.

For the 0.4.9 release I'll mark this test as TODO (along with the RT#
from this ticket). If anyone needs further information or testing
on my platform, let me know!

Thanks!

Pm

0 new messages