Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: [PATCH] PDD6 updates

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Chromatic

unread,
Feb 26, 2007, 4:39:18 AM2/26/07
to perl6-i...@perl.org
On Monday 26 February 2007 01:34, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:

> I made some additional changes to PDD16:
>
> * added an example to do a callback. I left in the "old" explanation,
> but Im' not sure how much of that is still relevant.
> * small text improvements wrt example nci
> * removed "CHANGES" section: it was just duplicating the history
> section. This PDD does *not* follow the standard as set in PDD00 anyway,
> that should be looked into once the PDD is in the approval process.

Looks good. I'd like to change the $P0 and $P1 to use actual variable names
(it's clearer for examples), but I can do that before I apply it tomorrow.

Anyone can, really. I'm happy to apply it though.

-- c

Klaas-Jan Stol

unread,
Feb 26, 2007, 4:34:52 AM2/26/07
to Perl 6 Internals
hi,

I made some additional changes to PDD16:

* added an example to do a callback. I left in the "old" explanation,
but Im' not sure how much of that is still relevant.
* small text improvements wrt example nci
* removed "CHANGES" section: it was just duplicating the history
section. This PDD does *not* follow the standard as set in PDD00 anyway,
that should be looked into once the PDD is in the approval process.

regards,
kjs

PDD16updates02262007.patch

Klaas-Jan Stol

unread,
Feb 26, 2007, 4:55:20 AM2/26/07
to chromatic, perl6-i...@perl.org
yes, good point. I was trying to save lines, but clarity is better.

> Anyone can, really. I'm happy to apply it though.
>
attached a new version with var.names.

kjs

PDD16updates02262007_2.patch

Allison Randal

unread,
Feb 27, 2007, 4:49:29 PM2/27/07
to Klaas-Jan Stol, chromatic, perl6-i...@perl.org
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
>>
>> Looks good. I'd like to change the $P0 and $P1 to use actual variable
>> names (it's clearer for examples), but I can do that before I apply it
>> tomorrow.
>>
> yes, good point. I was trying to save lines, but clarity is better.
>> Anyone can, really. I'm happy to apply it though.
>>
> attached a new version with var.names.

Thanks, applied in r17209.

Allison

0 new messages