Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

[perl #39734] t/doc/pod.t fails on Mac OS 10.4.6/perl 5.8.8

4 views
Skip to first unread message

David H . Adler

unread,
Jul 6, 2006, 2:16:40 AM7/6/06
to bugs-bi...@rt.perl.org
# New Ticket Created by David H. Adler
# Please include the string: [perl #39734]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# <URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39734 >


As bugs go, not a killer, but still...

The problem tests are as follows:

not ok 329 - POD test for /Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/src/ops/experimental.ops

# Failed test (t/doc/pod.t at line 62)
# /Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/src/ops/experimental.ops (229): '=item' outside of any '=over'

and

not ok 1162 - POD test for /Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/docs/ops/experimental.pod

# Failed test (t/doc/pod.t at line 62)
# /Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/docs/ops/experimental.pod (105): '=item' outside of any '=over'

(full test output attached)

dha

--
David H. Adler - <d...@panix.com> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
My dog is Web 2.0 enabled. Go ahead. Prove me wrong.
- Jesse Vincent

pod.t.out

Jerry Gay

unread,
Jul 6, 2006, 9:22:31 AM7/6/06
to perl6-i...@perl.org, bugs-bi...@rt.perl.org
On 7/5/06, via RT David H. Adler <parrotbug...@parrotcode.org> wrote:
> As bugs go, not a killer, but still...
>
> The problem tests are as follows:
>
> not ok 329 - POD test for /Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/src/ops/experimental.ops
>
> # Failed test (t/doc/pod.t at line 62)
> # /Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/src/ops/experimental.ops (229): '=item' outside of any '=over'
>
> and
>
> not ok 1162 - POD test for /Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/docs/ops/experimental.pod
>
> # Failed test (t/doc/pod.t at line 62)
> # /Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/docs/ops/experimental.pod (105): '=item' outside of any '=over'
>
i can't recreate this with a recent revision.
from the svn log, it seems src/ops/experimental.ops was modified 19 june.

perhaps you have a modified file in your working copy?
~jerry

<snip/>
Updated to revision 13181.

D:\usr\local\parrot\trunk>prove t/doc/pod.t
t/doc/pod....# finding files with pod, this may take a minute.
t/doc/pod....ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1177, 226 wallclock secs ( 0.00 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)

David H. Adler

unread,
Jul 6, 2006, 1:36:09 PM7/6/06
to perl6-i...@perl.org
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:22:31AM -0700, jerry gay wrote:
> On 7/5/06, via RT David H. Adler <parrotbug...@parrotcode.org> wrote:
> >As bugs go, not a killer, but still...
> >
> >The problem tests are as follows:
> >
> >not ok 329 - POD test for /Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/src/ops/experimental.ops
> >
> ># Failed test (t/doc/pod.t at line 62)
> ># /Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/src/ops/experimental.ops (229): '=item' outside
> >of any '=over'
> >
> >and
> >
> >not ok 1162 - POD test for
> >/Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/docs/ops/experimental.pod
> >
> ># Failed test (t/doc/pod.t at line 62)
> ># /Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/docs/ops/experimental.pod (105): '=item' outside
> >of any '=over'
> >
> i can't recreate this with a recent revision.
> from the svn log, it seems src/ops/experimental.ops was modified 19 june.
>
> perhaps you have a modified file in your working copy?

Actually, as I see it, you have a modified file in yours. :-)

I was working from the release version, which predates that change by
about 2 hours...

I guess it's fixed now. I suppose this is what I get for posting bug
reports at 3am...

dha

In the silence that followed, Homer was heard to mutter,
"Mmmm... context- dependent semantics..."
- Darrin Edwards in c.l.p.m.

Jerry Gay

unread,
Jul 6, 2006, 2:11:34 PM7/6/06
to David H. Adler, perl6-i...@perl.org
On 7/6/06, David H. Adler <d...@panix.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:22:31AM -0700, jerry gay wrote:
> > perhaps you have a modified file in your working copy?
>
> Actually, as I see it, you have a modified file in yours. :-)
>
> I was working from the release version, which predates that change by
> about 2 hours...
>
your report didn't specify which revision you were testing.
as parrot's under active (pre-release) development, i assumed HEAD.

> I guess it's fixed now. I suppose this is what I get for posting bug
> reports at 3am...
>

no problem, no bugs are good bugs :)
thanks for reporting!
~jerry

0 new messages