As bugs go, not a killer, but still...
The problem tests are as follows:
not ok 329 - POD test for /Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/src/ops/experimental.ops
# Failed test (t/doc/pod.t at line 62)
# /Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/src/ops/experimental.ops (229): '=item' outside of any '=over'
and
not ok 1162 - POD test for /Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/docs/ops/experimental.pod
# Failed test (t/doc/pod.t at line 62)
# /Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/docs/ops/experimental.pod (105): '=item' outside of any '=over'
(full test output attached)
dha
--
David H. Adler - <d...@panix.com> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
My dog is Web 2.0 enabled. Go ahead. Prove me wrong.
- Jesse Vincent
perhaps you have a modified file in your working copy?
~jerry
<snip/>
Updated to revision 13181.
D:\usr\local\parrot\trunk>prove t/doc/pod.t
t/doc/pod....# finding files with pod, this may take a minute.
t/doc/pod....ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1177, 226 wallclock secs ( 0.00 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
Actually, as I see it, you have a modified file in yours. :-)
I was working from the release version, which predates that change by
about 2 hours...
I guess it's fixed now. I suppose this is what I get for posting bug
reports at 3am...
dha
--
David H. Adler - <d...@panix.com> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
In the silence that followed, Homer was heard to mutter,
"Mmmm... context- dependent semantics..."
- Darrin Edwards in c.l.p.m.
> I guess it's fixed now. I suppose this is what I get for posting bug
> reports at 3am...
>
no problem, no bugs are good bugs :)
thanks for reporting!
~jerry