Google 网上论坛不再支持新的 Usenet 帖子或订阅项。历史内容仍可供查看。

PDD review, onward and upward

已查看 0 次
跳至第一个未读帖子

Allison Randal

未读,
2006年7月23日 18:50:352006/7/23
收件人 parrot-...@perl.org
I've just finished a read-through of all the PDDs (which I said I'd do
by OSCON), and will check in the embedded notes I made while reading
when I can connect to svn.perl.org again (known outage, nothing to worry
about).

The next step is to go through the PDDs one-by-one, updating/expanding
them, and then moving them out of the clip directory. To make the best
use of available brain power, we'll have open discussions about each PDD
on the list as I review it. Starting with... <drum roll>... PDD 17,
Basic Types. So, what's out of date, what has never been implemented (or
never will be), what needs to be talked about but isn't mentioned?

(The queue of PDDs to review has a semi-random order. If you'd like to
see a particular PDD get bumped earlier, drop me an email.)

Allison

Joshua Hoblitt

未读,
2006年7月24日 05:49:112006/7/24
收件人 Allison Randal、parrot-...@perl.org
I'd like to see PPD 25 "threads" reviewed. The ruff API isn't even
layed out in this document -- is there supposed to be a thread PMC or
what? I'm also concerned about the performance impact of having to
always check if a PMC is shared and having to spin a mutex if it is. At
a minimum it should be possible at runtime to disable the automatic
locking.

-J

--

Jerry Gay

未读,
2006年7月24日 09:18:212006/7/24
收件人 Allison Randal、parrot-...@perl.org
On 7/23/06, Allison Randal <all...@perl.org> wrote:
> I've just finished a read-through of all the PDDs (which I said I'd do
> by OSCON), and will check in the embedded notes I made while reading
> when I can connect to svn.perl.org again (known outage, nothing to worry
> about).
>
yay!

> The next step is to go through the PDDs one-by-one, updating/expanding
> them, and then moving them out of the clip directory. To make the best
> use of available brain power, we'll have open discussions about each PDD
> on the list as I review it. Starting with... <drum roll>... PDD 17,
> Basic Types. So, what's out of date, what has never been implemented (or
> never will be), what needs to be talked about but isn't mentioned?
>

there are rt tickets for this task. i find it helpful to use these to
organize the review and discussion of each pdd, you may too. i'll put
my thoughts on the subject in that ticket.

~jerry

0 个新帖子