Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

Rare failure of t/dynoplibs/myops alarm sequence

0 views

Skip to first unread message

Tim Bunce

unread,

Feb 28, 2006, 8:59:35 AM2/28/06

to perl6-i...@perl.org

FYI I saw this once but haven't been able to repeat it:

t/dynoplibs/myops....................ok 6/7
# Failed test (t/dynoplibs/myops.t at line 107)
# got: '1
# alarm1
# 2
# alarm2
# 3
# alarm3
# alarm1
# alarm3
# alarm3
# 4
# alarm3
# alarm3
# 5
# done.
t/dynoplibs/myops....................NOK 7# '
# expected: '1
# alarm1
# 2
# alarm2
# 3
# alarm3
# alarm1
# alarm3
# 4
# alarm3
# alarm3
# alarm3
# 5
# done.
# '
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 7.
t/dynoplibs/myops....................dubious
Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
DIED. FAILED test 7
Failed 1/7 tests, 85.71% okay

Tim [using r11741]

Leopold Toetsch

unread,

Feb 28, 2006, 9:37:23 AM2/28/06

to Tim Bunce, perl6-i...@perl.org

On Feb 28, 2006, at 14:59, Tim Bunce wrote:

> FYI I saw this once but haven't been able to repeat it:
>
> t/dynoplibs/myops....................ok 6/7

This can happen if the machine is busy.

leo

Tim Bunce

unread,

Feb 28, 2006, 3:59:22 PM2/28/06

to Leopold Toetsch, Tim Bunce, perl6-i...@perl.org

Okay. Can't the test be made more robust? Or emit a warning note?

(Not a big issue, just wondering if there's some reason for it.
I might look at it myself if there isn't a reason it can't be fixed.)

Ti.

Leopold Toetsch

unread,

Mar 4, 2006, 11:40:18 AM3/4/06

to Tim Bunce, perl6-i...@perl.org

On Feb 28, 2006, at 21:59, Tim Bunce wrote:

>> This can happen if the machine is busy.
>
> Okay. Can't the test be made more robust? Or emit a warning note?

Probably yes with increased testing time (longer sleep) - a warning
note is always ok.

leo

0 new messages