Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Bugs
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Autrijus Tang  
View profile  
 More options Mar 4 2005, 11:04 am
Newsgroups: perl.perl6.compiler
From: autri...@autrijus.org (Autrijus Tang)
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 00:04:16 +0800
Local: Fri, Mar 4 2005 11:04 am
Subject: Re: [PUGS] Bugs

On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:17:03PM -0500, Stevan Little wrote:
> I have managed to track down two different bugs/issues with PUGS. I
> explain them here in detail with examples, and todo_* tests for them
> are included in the following test files:
>   t/op/shift.t
>   t/op/pop.t
>   t/op/push.t
>   t/op/unshift.t

The double evaluation bug has been fixed today. It was result of a
misunderstanding of the role of $_ when the subroutine body does
not mention $_, but makes use of slurpy arrays (as is the default with
@*_), and has no invocants when actually used; in that case $_ is
probably best undefined (or bound to the first non-invocant argument?
Can we get a ruling?); I have stopped evaluation for $_ in that case for
now, which solves the double evaluation bug.

Thanks,
/Autrijus/

  application_pgp-signature_part
< 1K Download

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google