Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion benchmarking - it's now all(-1,0,1,5,6)% faster
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
hv  
View profile  
 More options Jan 11 2003, 10:48 pm
Newsgroups: perl.perl5.porters
From: h...@crypt.org
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 03:44:06 +0000
Local: Sat, Jan 11 2003 10:44 pm
Subject: Re: benchmarking - it's now all(-1,0,1,5,6)% faster
Nicholas Clark <n...@unfortu.net> wrote:

:So I'm confused. It looks like some bits of perl are incredibly sensitive to
:cache alignment, or something similar. And as a consequence, perlbench is
:reliably reporting wildly varying timings because of this, and because it
:only tries a few, very specific things. Does this mean that it's still useful?

I think I remember seeing a profiler that emulates the x86 instruction set,
and so can give theoretically exact timings. Does this ring a bell for
anyone? I don't know if the emulation extended to details such as RAM
and cache sizes ...

Hugo


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.