Message from discussion
Missing perl516.dll on running packed executables with Strawberry Perl 5.16.1
Received: by 10.180.75.197 with SMTP id e5mr1390002wiw.1.1349571157078;
Sat, 06 Oct 2012 17:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: perl.par
Path: q11ni134182665wiw.1!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newspeer1.nac.net!news.mi.ras.ru!goblin-spool!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!nntp.develooper.com!nntp.perl.org
Return-Path: <dave.se...@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact par-h...@perl.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list p...@perl.org
Received: (qmail 9046 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2012 16:03:20 -0000
Received: from x1.develooper.com (207.171.7.70)
by x6.develooper.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2012 16:03:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 19248 invoked by uid 225); 2 Oct 2012 16:03:20 -0000
Delivered-To: p...@perl.org
Received: (qmail 19244 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2012 16:03:19 -0000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=8.0
tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: la.mx.develooper.com
Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169)
by la.mx.develooper.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 09:03:12 -0700
Received: by weyu3 with SMTP id u3so4595562wey.14
for <p...@perl.org>; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 09:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=aXE/ZvF4roVNW0NIXmlWAWY5xJyAZhvacFPsUFoCcVM=;
b=vW1PtJXLYUb+TUgBuTF3Htvl+ufHS0m/dGaX9f4A+nsDnkJYVSx1j157v9gD8PCwYh
hRd+I46s8Nb4hwWBNYq7mmtJr6Tt0uNqutUFQxqUv8bKxh/nIlx9nV/oz+GdfyCxh664
FUXD7Ffh/zAlukQqU1O/ju3DiNWuV98TUuWaCaRYF+VEpRLdNSFIiqSS384ItQfTE03/
S2Kh/LnDtw7INAtPS3xg5usgMpPGEq5A8rWZ+akQEZsjX7r8Gdmv4TBxlxdmBxigRI7D
J9UO8evFgxu6H7/eeQs46uqcqBlvQxThjbf7ZLHttrfEmLdvmOR3+jbGbgjMtcQPbKL7
8ZXQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.79.2 with SMTP id f2mr22973264wix.2.1349193787339; Tue, 02
Oct 2012 09:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.157.69 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 09:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFuG6mK9M=8STSFSVNTK8sOonfZfzVmOAr6Jb-hoUr8EYXX...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <loom.20120928T115621-...@post.gmane.org>
<CAC9r9zYrSw+iwiDBCVbRrw21zvp8C9tVcX-qV2SB97nBEg+...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFuG6m+2uqGnYUk9cn6U3RNofVn2=d3eDX0ME74jb=G2po=...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAC9r9zZzEgEqrcYBo6OTEXUzCtetw6u2osghOg-MHpQ7xVD...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFuG6m+Km3Yd9Wfys+wMWkVj+kZTGHMtXqhjHfRdL6kF3wm...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAC9r9zY4ffwjCHtxavp=gnCaRjfguLiWJkZDQk59KSi+zUN...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFuG6mK9N7jfWA1270p7RLagFo37X7qdhE2=VUEgHHFy-ua...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAC9r9zaMj0iX9yBvfA6-xzNx_XqsRsExqGRsYs7V8BNv1xk...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFuG6mJY-Tb1YXiAjouESS-tC3O1ZtAJZPU7BocWdxg9pCo...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAC9r9zbsfPmnmzeMV6BG9dTRpK6EREjBS1geqpy0YMFnn+p...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFuG6mLvvb8fRbeMkhUT+ZWyxV4VXQrHo=af_GnrgQxoeqn...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFuG6mK9M=8STSFSVNTK8sOonfZfzVmOAr6Jb-hoUr8EYXX...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 17:03:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFuG6mKwdwtuVGe9yctGYJ-v=haJYCrr7=toO3P3r2oOopL...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Missing perl516.dll on running packed executables with Strawberry
Perl 5.16.1
To: Roderich Schupp <roderich.sch...@googlemail.com>
Cc: p...@perl.org
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
Approved: n...@nntp.perl.org
From: dave.se...@gmail.com (David Sedar)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Roderich,
Have more or less figured out how to invoke Patch, this is the output it
produced:
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ru PAR-Packer-1.013\myldr\Makefile.PL
PAR-Packer-1.013_patched\myldr\Makefile.PL
|--- PAR-Packer-1.013\myldr\Makefile.PL Thu Jan 26 19:51:55 2012
|+++ PAR-Packer-1.013_patched\myldr\Makefile.PL Tue Apr 10 15:08:37 2012
--------------------------
Patching file Makefile.PL using Plan A...
Hunk #1 FAILED at 113.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.PL.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
can't find file to patch at input line 27
Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|NOOP)';
| } else {
|diff -ru PAR-Packer-1.013\myldr\winres\pp.rc
PAR-Packer-1.013_patched\myldr\winres\pp.rc
|--- PAR-Packer-1.013\myldr\winres\pp.rc Thu Jan 26 19:51:55 2012
|+++ PAR-Packer-1.013_patched\myldr\winres\pp.rc Tue Apr 10 14:25:10 2012
--------------------------
File to patch:
Skip this patch? [y]
Skipping patch.
Hunk #1 ignored at 5.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
Hmm...missing header for unified diff at line 37 of patch
The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
can't find file to patch at input line 37
Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
File to patch:
Skip this patch? [y]
Skipping patch.
Hmm...missing header for unified diff at line 38 of patch
The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
can't find file to patch at input line 38
Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
and on and on...
Regards
DAS
On 1 October 2012 17:12, David Sedar <dave.se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Roderich,
> I have installed cpan 'patch' 0.14 (and 'diff' for good measure).
> However not sure when and where I should invoke it.
> Running it before or after 'perl makefile.pl' and 'dmake'
> in the PAR-Packer-1.013 folder produces the same output:
> 'patching file Makefile.PL'
> 'Assertion failed: hunk, file .\src\patch\2.5.9\patch-2.5.9-src\patch.c,
> line 354'
> 'This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual
> way,
> Please contact the application's support team for more information'
>
> Could you please clarify what I am doing wrong
> Regards
> DAS
>
> On 30 September 2012 12:02, David Sedar <dave.se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Roderich,
>> Many thanks for the diff file, but I am rather a newbie:
>> exactly how do I apply it?
>> Regards
>> DAS
>>
>> On 29 September 2012 19:19, Roderich Schupp <
>> roderich.sch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 7:24 PM, David Sedar <dave.se...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I can see the error, what is the fix please?
>>>
>>> Apply the attached patch (it's already in my source repository, but I
>>> haven't made
>>> a release yet).
>>>
>>> Cheers, Roderich
>>>
>>
>>
>