Anything blocking a 1.1.4?

[Christopher Forsythe]

Is there anything left before starting a 1.1.4 release cycle?

Chris

[Alexander Strange]

On Apr 30, 7:31 pm, Christopher Forsythe <ch...@growl.info> wrote:
> Is there anything left before starting a 1.1.4 release cycle?
>
> Chris

I'm done. Does anyone have anything else left?

I have a sample which does strange things to VobSub - it displays
differently in x86 and ppc, and the decoder goes into an infinite loop
at some point. But I'd rather do a public beta to see if there's any
more files like that.

And I'm waiting on a patch approval in ffmpeg, but that will probably
be done before anyone even reads this. Otherwise I'll do it as a local
patch.

[Graham Booker]

On May 24, 2009, at 8:55 PM, Alexander Strange wrote:
> On Apr 30, 7:31 pm, Christopher Forsythe <ch...@growl.info> wrote:
>> Is there anything left before starting a 1.1.4 release cycle?
>>
>> Chris
>
> I'm done. Does anyone have anything else left?

I was just working on the changelog earlier today. I committed what I
have; so if others could look at it and make sure I didn't leave
anything out, I'd appreciate it. I compiled it from looking at commit
messages, so I may have some errors in it, especially concerning subs.

- Graham

[Alexander Strange]

Changed it around a little and added a few more fixes I remembered
doing (but forgot to put in the commit message).

I wanted to have bug numbers like Adium's changelog, but it looks like
we don't use trac enough for that, so it has SVN revisions instead.

[Alexander Strange]

The beta worked about as well as I expected - no user reports at all.
Might as well allow version tracking sites, or have a beta appcast
+nightly build site. As long as I don't have to do it, anyway.

I fixed some stuff I found testing 10.6, but of course I can't say
what it was. Should work fine now, anyway. Any problems with an RC?

[Christopher Forsythe]

Let's just release it if this is the case. If people are disinterested in our beta process, we might as well just stop trying to do betas and just put out untested releases.

[timf...@gmail.com]

Hi, I am a previous beta tester/donator... I was not aware that there
was a new beta release. Was this a private beta release to developers
only?

On Jun 24, 12:37 am, Christopher Forsythe <ch...@growl.info> wrote:
> Let's just release it if this is the case. If people are disinterested in
> our beta process, we might as well just stop trying to do betas and just put
> out untested releases.
>

[Graham Booker]

On Jun 23, 2009, at 3:12 PM, timf...@gmail.com wrote:

>
> Hi, I am a previous beta tester/donator... I was not aware that there
> was a new beta release. Was this a private beta release to developers
> only?

It's linked from the webpage, in the Develop tab.

>
> On Jun 24, 12:37 am, Christopher Forsythe <ch...@growl.info> wrote:
>> Let's just release it if this is the case. If people are
>> disinterested in
>> our beta process, we might as well just stop trying to do betas and
>> just put
>> out untested releases.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Alexander Strange
>> <astra...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> The beta worked about as well as I expected - no user reports at
>>> all.
>>> Might as well allow version tracking sites, or have a beta appcast
>>> +nightly build site. As long as I don't have to do it, anyway.
>>
>>> I fixed some stuff I found testing 10.6, but of course I can't say
>>> what it was. Should work fine now, anyway. Any problems with an RC?

- Graham

[Alexander Strange]

On Jun 24, 9:12 am, Graham Booker <gboo...@cod3r.com> wrote:

> On Jun 23, 2009, at 3:12 PM, timfre...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi, I am a previous beta tester/donator... I was not aware that there
> > was a new beta release. Was this a private beta release to developers
> > only?
>
> It's linked from the webpage, in the Develop tab.

Well, probably advertising it to them too would've helped ;)

BTW, Valgrind has just started being able to run QuickTime, so that
might expose some more bugs. But it finds so many errors in QT already
(> 1000 just opening a file) that it might take a while to work
through the log...

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 24, 12:37 am, Christopher Forsythe <ch...@growl.info> wrote:
> >> Let's just release it if this is the case. If people are  
> >> disinterested in
> >> our beta process, we might as well just stop trying to do betas and  
> >> just put
> >> out untested releases.
>
> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Alexander Strange  
> >> <astra...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >>> The beta worked about as well as I expected - no user reports at  
> >>> all.
> >>> Might as well allow version tracking sites, or have a beta appcast
> >>> +nightly build site. As long as I don't have to do it, anyway.
>
> >>> I fixed some stuff I found testing 10.6, but of course I can't say
> >>> what it was. Should work fine now, anyway. Any problems with an RC?
>
> - Graham
>

>  smime.p7s
> 4KViewDownload