Message from discussion
Checklist, opquast, référentiel
Received: by 10.231.92.15 with SMTP id p15mr2341765ibm.18.1302555077715;
Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: performance-web@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.231.178.17 with SMTP id bk17ls324783ibb.1.p; Mon, 11 Apr 2011
13:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.185.153 with SMTP id co25mr1714147ibb.10.1302555077217;
Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.185.153 with SMTP id co25mr1714146ibb.10.1302555077199;
Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <franco...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com (mail-iy0-f174.google.com [209.85.210.174])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r31si1362068ibu.2.2011.04.11.13.51.17
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of franco...@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.174;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of franco...@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=franco...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by iyb14 with SMTP id 14so7624238iyb.5
for <performance-web@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to
:x-mailer;
bh=CXKX9eBu93Cat7IbvUAzvefsSZdWZwK7z6xSQjhmvgc=;
b=hPx8wR21KN66KV7NlnXZCD3+h0iA9rP0n9leIIQwQUc8R4GFlAxAmTMTOYEI9u3Ceq
4NE8jijpQ6+OHO6e/UVmiIJAbJz137MaAWBPeRXqFDfm3qKOXeGF3h+I9CCgZ0AB4qOC
j88dwNL4yhfAtwNXBtQfjQ7V26HNmG8QBrt1s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
b=RctEKwerpjjOjeHIXeKHZ67jKppxT/D0g2Ped8SZKd8nA7BAXIazVyZzgm/EWxLtn1
zZiKCxHcZiWla1gv6TWIMDIFGfFIGdV/peXHN8rRCo9MtWecKYo4plMvPLTWDr287+98
OmwJUQi17Z6ps6bvmCGLaBQKkq3rssPv3I9Ko=
Received: by 10.42.147.68 with SMTP id m4mr4788115icv.529.1302555077058;
Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <franco...@gmail.com>
Received: from [192.168.0.69] ([203.80.53.252])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id uk4sm4164335icb.9.2011.04.11.13.51.14
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_=5Bperformance-web=5D_Re=3A_Checklist=2C_op?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?quast=2C_r=E9f=E9rentiel?=
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Nonnenmacher?= <franco...@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <587D2840-3617-4F4C-9120-26E5DB942...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:51:11 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8FADA96F-F9CD-4CD0-AC9E-C40AB22C1...@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimqCTS=1_U60P4qKm+Bm_wsDXePp_PF3idMs...@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimxPWSRZ-reh5wrsPV+jzjvO2n...@mail.gmail.com> <0998b97c-d672-4869-8a27-55daad4a4...@w36g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <BANLkTi=pr=dTOaZyeZBSRrpghFcAjFO...@mail.gmail.com> <FBF36A30-CB5E-49B3-86DF-5DFF34E29...@gmail.com> <BANLkTikcy87K0pn02G4wV8zqiO6_Q0t...@mail.gmail.com> <587D2840-3617-4F4C-9120-26E5DB942...@gmail.com>
To: performance-web@googlegroups.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
On 12 avr. 2011, at 03:47, Nicolas Le Gall wrote:
>> Toute checklist faisant l'objet d'un consensus aiderait =E0 f=E9d=E9rer=
les discussions, et surtout "=E9vang=E9liser" sur le sujet.
>> Une telle checklist en fran=E7ais permettrait de promouvoir plus =
facilement ces BP en France et autres pays francophones, alors que le =
sujet est largement domin=E9 par les contenus anglo saxons.
>=20
> Je ne suis toujours pas s=FBr de voir l'int=E9r=EAt. En quoi un =
contenu fran=E7ais aurait-il plus de poids qu'un contenu anglo-saxon ?
Pas une question de poids mais d'accessibilit=E9. Tous les fran=E7ais ne =
sont pas =E0 l'aise en anglais (euph=E9misme).