Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Canada Customs is no longer seizing gomorrahy porn

22 views
Skip to first unread message

Customs Watch

unread,
Oct 5, 2003, 8:01:59 PM10/5/03
to
Explicit description or depiction of gomorrahy - be it fisting
(insertion of a hand into an introitus/vagina or an anus/anal canal),
footing (insertion of a foot into an introitus/vagina or an anus/anal
canal), or stumping (insertion of the stump of a limb into an
introitus/vagina or an anus/anal canal) - in pornographic material is no
longer one of Canada Customs and Revenue Agency's (sub)criteria for
prohibition of importation under tariff item No. 9899.00.00 of the List
of Tariff Provisions to the CUSTOMS TARIFF. This change was recently
affected by an appeal to Customs Disputes that concerned three
pornographic videos which had been seized by the Prohibited Importations
Unit on the grounds that they contained explicit descriptions and
depictions of gomorrahy - to wit, vaginal fisting, anal fisting, and
vaginal footing - and hence were alleged by the Unit to constitute
"obscenity" as defined under the CRIMINAL CODE. In view of the
arguments and evidence presented by the appellant party in support of
its postion that such descriptions and depictions in pornographic
material do not, in fact, render the material "obscene" as defined under
the Code, the case was decided in its favour on or about Wednesday
August 6 of this year.
The accordingly amended Memorandum D9-1-1, CANADA CUSTOMS AND
REVENUE AGENCY'S POLICY ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF OBSCENE MATERIAL, can
now be viewed as a HyperText Markup Language (HTML) file on the Canada
Customs and Revenue Agency website at
http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/E/pub/cm/d9-1-1/d9-1-1-e.html, viewed as a
Portable Document Format (PDF) file at
http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/E/pub/cm/d9-1-1/d9-1-1-e.pdf, or downloaded
as either of these at
http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/E/pub/cm/d9-1-1/README.html.

Customs Watch

--
Help stop Big Brother (http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/) from continuing to
molest Little Sister (http://www.littlesistersbookstore.com/)!


Chris Meunier

unread,
Oct 5, 2003, 9:03:19 PM10/5/03
to
Happy day! :P

"Customs Watch" <cus...@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:3F80B0F8...@rogers.com...

Marshmallow

unread,
Oct 6, 2003, 6:36:42 AM10/6/03
to
My world was a little bit happier before learning what gomarraphy was....


"Customs Watch" <cus...@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:3F80B0F8...@rogers.com...

Roark

unread,
Oct 6, 2003, 8:21:15 AM10/6/03
to
Well. I can't tell you how relieved I am to know that I will be able
to get my issues of Gomorrahy Monthly or Stumping Illustrated on a
regular basis. The quality of life in this coutry has just gotten
better.
I don't like censorship, so in that regard this is a good thing.
Still, I think it says something really disturbing about us when we
fight for freedom of speech so we can receive images of "insertion of
a hand into an introitus/vagina or an anus/anal canal". When these
laws were written, was somebody thinking, "Boy, I could really use
some good stumping porn right about now?"
Thoreau was more right than he knew....in the modern world, anybody of
any sense would pack it all in and go live in the woods by a pond, you
know. It's just too freakin' bizarre out here.

Customs Watch <cus...@rogers.com> wrote in message news:<3F80B0F8...@rogers.com>...

Denis

unread,
Oct 6, 2003, 8:06:32 PM10/6/03
to
Gee, now doesn't that just make everyone want to run out and get some
gomorrahy? Everyone get in line, no crowding


Customs Watch <cus...@rogers.com> wrote in message news:<3F80B0F8...@rogers.com>...

williams8080

unread,
Oct 6, 2003, 10:11:45 PM10/6/03
to
While this may be true, you will still find that the majority of Customs
Brokers will not import these goods for you. And unless you want to travel
to the nearest port of entry (which for my broker is Montreal) and clear it
yourself, then you're still not going to get it!

Besides... who would want it??!!!

"Customs Watch" <cus...@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:3F80B0F8...@rogers.com...

Pete Dexter

unread,
Oct 7, 2003, 8:36:10 AM10/7/03
to
On Mon, 06 Oct 2003 00:01:59 GMT, Customs Watch <cus...@rogers.com>
wrote:

you know.........CHRIST,, ALMIGHTY....what a bunch of fuckin' garbage.
Nice to know that all the goddamned perverts and creeps can indulge
their little fantasies under the good graces of Canada Customs and
maggots like you who advertise for them. Being legal does not make
something moral.

Whats next? kiddie porn becomes OK??

Denis

unread,
Oct 7, 2003, 6:57:21 PM10/7/03
to
Even though I find this really sick, you can't compare it to child
porn. The people involved in this gomorrahy are adult and choose to
participate


Pete Dexter <teamb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<5bc5ovoj7tndujn7q...@4ax.com>...

Pete Dexter

unread,
Oct 8, 2003, 8:00:13 AM10/8/03
to
On 7 Oct 2003 15:57:21 -0700, denis...@ns.sympatico.ca (Denis)
wrote:

>Even though I find this really sick, you can't compare it to child
>porn. The people involved in this gomorrahy are adult and choose to
>participate

I wasn't comparing it, yes you're right its a totally different group
of perverts.


Customs Watch

unread,
Oct 8, 2003, 3:44:54 PM10/8/03
to
blah wrote:

> X-No-Archive: yes On Mon, 06 Oct 2003 00:01:59 GMT, Customs Watch


> <cus...@rogers.com> wrote:
>
> > Explicit description or depiction of gomorrahy - be it fisting
> >(insertion of a hand into an introitus/vagina or an anus/anal canal),
> >footing (insertion of a foot into an introitus/vagina or an anus/anal
> >canal), or stumping (insertion of the stump of a limb into an
> >introitus/vagina or an anus/anal canal) - in pornographic material is no
> >longer one of Canada Customs and Revenue Agency's (sub)criteria for
> >prohibition of importation under tariff item No. 9899.00.00 of the List
> >of Tariff Provisions to the CUSTOMS TARIFF.
>

> Well thank god for that! I was getting tired of all those stumping
> surcharges. Seriously though - I had to look up introitus in the
> Marriam Webster dictionary but it doesn't even appear as a word :-(

"Introitus" = vaginal orifice. The introitus is to the vagina what
the anus is to the anal canal.

> Neither does gommorrahy.

It's "gomorrahy" (single "m").
The following sex acts are subsumed under "gomorrahy": Fisting
(insertion of a hand into an introitus/vagina or an anus/anal canal);


footing (insertion of a foot into an introitus/vagina or an anus/anal

canal); and stumping (insertion of the stump of a limb into an
introitus/vagina or an anus/anal canal).
I'm not sure whether the insertion of a head or the stump of a neck
into an introitus/vagina or an anus/anal canal also constitute forms of
gomorrahy. As far as I know, this matter has never been addressed by
Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (C.C.R.A.), which probably has never
inspected any pornographic material containing explicit
descriptions/depictions of what I suppose would be called "heading" and
"neck stumping", respectively. (C.C.R.A. should have addressed this
matter prior to September 9; after all, Customs officers are constantly
sticking their heads up their asses!) In any case, pornographic material
that explicitly describes/depicts the insertion of an adult human's head
into a woman's introitus/vagina or a woman's/man's anus/anal canal would
undoubtedly be classified under Memorandum D9-1-1 as "sex with
pain/mutilation", and pornographic material that explicitly
describes/depicts the insertion of the stump of a decapitated adult
human corpse's neck into said would undoubtedly be classified as
"necrophilia". (If "neck stumping" constitutes a form of gomorrahy, then
"neck stumping" with a corpse constitutes a form of... necrophilic
gomorrahy! As for whether any persons can be "neck stumpers",
conceivably, a former dicephalic conjoined twin could be one....)

Roark

unread,
Oct 10, 2003, 7:50:20 AM10/10/03
to
Disturbingly educational. Now I'm stuck with this knowledge, and will
shudder whenever I think of it.

Customs Watch <cus...@rogers.com> wrote in message news:<3F84693C...@rogers.com>...

Customs Watch

unread,
Oct 22, 2003, 4:32:55 AM10/22/03
to
Roark wrote:

> Disturbingly educational. Now I'm stuck with this knowledge, and will
> shudder whenever I think of it.
>
> Customs Watch <cus...@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:<3F84693C...@rogers.com>...
> >

> > <snip>


> >
> > The following sex acts are subsumed under "gomorrahy": Fisting
> > (insertion of a hand into an introitus/vagina or an anus/anal canal);
> > footing (insertion of a foot into an introitus/vagina or an anus/anal
> > canal); and stumping (insertion of the stump of a limb into an
> > introitus/vagina or an anus/anal canal).
> > I'm not sure whether the insertion of a head or the stump of a neck
> > into an introitus/vagina or an anus/anal canal also constitute forms of
> > gomorrahy. As far as I know, this matter has never been addressed by
> > Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (C.C.R.A.), which probably has never
> > inspected any pornographic material containing explicit
> > descriptions/depictions of what I suppose would be called "heading" and
> > "neck stumping", respectively. (C.C.R.A. should have addressed this
> > matter prior to September 9; after all, Customs officers are constantly
> > sticking their heads up their asses!) In any case, pornographic material
> > that explicitly describes/depicts the insertion of an adult human's head
> > into a woman's introitus/vagina or a woman's/man's anus/anal canal would
> > undoubtedly be classified under Memorandum D9-1-1 as "sex with
> > pain/mutilation", and pornographic material that explicitly
> > describes/depicts the insertion of the stump of a decapitated adult
> > human corpse's neck into said would undoubtedly be classified as
> > "necrophilia". (If "neck stumping" constitutes a form of gomorrahy, then
> > "neck stumping" with a corpse constitutes a form of... necrophilic
> > gomorrahy! As for whether any persons can be "neck stumpers",
> > conceivably, a former dicephalic conjoined twin could be one....)

For those who are interested, you can freely download a clip from
the "Grand Canyon" segment of Leisure Time Entertainment (LTE), Inc.'s
THE ALL NEW FREAKS OF NATURE (VHS: EMP027 -
http://www.directvideoanddvd.com/showdetail.asp?product_ID=27694) -
starring Heaven Leigh (was
http://www.heaven-leigh.com/ and hv...@mediaone.net) and Rod Fontana
(http://www.rodfontana.com/) - at JackStroker.com ("This shit is crazy
[Head in Pussy]
MPEG(556k)" - http://www.jackstroker.com/CP/hum/humor.shtml or
http://www.jackstroker.com/CP/hum/pages/video/gifs/HeadUpHole.mpe).

0 new messages