Message from discussion
URIs for media types
Received: by 10.180.90.198 with SMTP id by6mr570197wib.4.1335374199623;
Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: pedantic-web@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.19.168 with SMTP id g8ls193616wie.2.gmail; Wed, 25 Apr
2012 10:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.181.13.198 with SMTP id fa6mr576675wid.0.1335374198711;
Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.181.13.198 with SMTP id fa6mr576674wid.0.1335374198696;
Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <sesunc...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com (mail-we0-f175.google.com [74.125.82.175])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fm5si110010wib.2.2012.04.25.10.16.38
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sesunc...@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.175;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sesunc...@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sesunc...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by wera1 with SMTP id a1so222391wer.6
for <pedantic-web@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=XQObrnhbHsQYiKiRPVSP5GcRQ4ClhpzIIyotG9XmxwU=;
b=Utcx+BsYg7J7JEsIBRNEYtv0+hqS2a5OXf0ArltrnKaaan3uneS36BW0raUJYOaIce
nEDcQ6w+Q0CmCwqDdHagvSsR4RRV/O+gbuPs+u8ZC6bFs3w3o+oph7UdEf9HKPKQuhCI
bIlhJ6La/2XOzX92XJtxiRaicjBV5/k+QSZUGhCBJW5BEfv1t2OqS1gFbfYT16oAdCs9
jHB4MiyHWO80cHp72jCJWPFLdidG7pU5FgdUWxdU3rygOXWz0/BGT4kWFLMy4Hv+L0EM
WAhERj5us+kiFOutWr74qNIdk4HJloZApL+jIazKlzwTXKgKnenwKpPwF07lz+AsQU5c
dPdg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.76.240 with SMTP id n16mr8494610wiw.10.1335374198566; Wed,
25 Apr 2012 10:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.122.11 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.122.11 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <56614922-5299-42CF-9755-F3B00B9AB...@cyganiak.de>
References: <4F93894C.9040...@deri.org>
<CAE0MQeFrn0xmD0=FbyEnbk27cdubNg+2qB3TtanZRt85b4O...@mail.gmail.com>
<4F952845.60...@kit.edu>
<20120423.134541.358048224...@styx.org>
<4F966CD8.3090...@kit.edu>
<4F97DBD4.1010...@deri.org>
<4F97F4C8.4080...@kit.edu>
<CAFfrAFoWULzStVYCAxgJWM=MVi7Rrit4F7oH36J7g920qEZ...@mail.gmail.com>
<6C0FE85B-4D96-4C56-B006-2A7002B97...@cyganiak.de>
<CADE8KM5Onqv+L08+mVA_Apv85EZaMSqRhhOkKdU4_6zftWz...@mail.gmail.com>
<56614922-5299-42CF-9755-F3B00B9AB...@cyganiak.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:16:38 -0400
Message-ID: <CADE8KM6-REQ81K60OGPrUqNu+xYPsbaS3QO5SOg-9OL7iV7...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [pedantic-web] Re: URIs for media types
From: Simon Spero <sesunc...@gmail.com>
To: pedantic-web@googlegroups.com
Cc: slabrams...@gmail.com, Lisa.Col...@ucop.edu
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c7b22bf6ef104be840890
--f46d043c7b22bf6ef104be840890
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Udfr is designed to be a long term preservation tool, so the uris should be
around for a while :)
I believe there is a sparql endpoint (it's on top of virtuoso).
There's an open meeting presenting the work on may 4th at The Library of
Congress- for details see below:
http://www.netpreserve.org/events/dc_ga/UDFR-community-meeting-2012-05-04.p=
df
On Apr 25, 2012 12:57 PM, "Richard Cyganiak" <rich...@cyganiak.de> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 25 Apr 2012, at 16:50, Simon Spero wrote:
> > I would suggest taking a look at the Unified Digital Format Registry
> (UDFR).
> =85
> > application/rdf+xml is http://udfr.org/udfr/u1r130
>
> How would I find out about this URI when starting from the string
> "application/rdf+xml"?
>
> Is UDFR updated with new IANA registrations?
>
> How long will UDFR exist?
>
> UDFR's coverage of media types is somewhat incomplete, e.g., MathML and
> TEI are missing.
>
> For web engineering purposes, I'd be more confident if IANA would assign
> URIs to the IANA-registered media types.
>
> Many
> Best,
> Richard
>
>
>
> >
> > Simon
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Richard Cyganiak <rich...@cyganiak.de>
> wrote:
> > On 25 Apr 2012, at 14:01, Dan Brickley wrote:
> > > There's also an old W3C TAG note on this,
> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/01-uriMediaType-9 ... perhaps worth
> > > checking in there for progress?
> >
> > The question of URIs for media types is one that comes up *all the time=
*.
> >
> > This TAG Finding from 2002 recommends that IANA mint URIs for media
> types.
> >
> > As far as I know, no progress has been made.
> >
> > Does anyone have a contact in IANA who might give some insights into th=
e
> obstacles or suggest how progress could be made?
> >
> > Should we approach the TAG and ask them again to lobby IANA?
> >
> > Best,
> > Richard
> >
>
>
--f46d043c7b22bf6ef104be840890
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p>Udfr is designed to be a long term preservation tool, so the uris should=
be around for a while :)</p>
<p>I believe there is a sparql endpoint (it's on top of virtuoso).</p>
<p>There's an open meeting presenting the work on may 4th at The Librar=
y of Congress- for details see below:</p>
<p><a href=3D"http://www.netpreserve.org/events/dc_ga/UDFR-community-meetin=
g-2012-05-04.pdf">http://www.netpreserve.org/events/dc_ga/UDFR-community-me=
eting-2012-05-04.pdf</a></p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Apr 25, 2012 12:57 PM, "Richard Cyganiak=
" <<a href=3D"mailto:rich...@cyganiak.de" target=3D"_blank">richard=
@cyganiak.de</a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gm=
ail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-le=
ft:1ex">
Hi Simon,<br>
<br>
On 25 Apr 2012, at 16:50, Simon Spero wrote:<br>
> I would suggest taking a look at the Unified Digital Format Registry (=
UDFR).<br>
=85<br>
> application/rdf+xml is =A0<a href=3D"http://udfr.org/udfr/u1r130" targ=
et=3D"_blank">http://udfr.org/udfr/u1r130</a><br>
<br>
How would I find out about this URI when starting from the string "app=
lication/rdf+xml"?<br>
<br>
Is UDFR updated with new IANA registrations?<br>
<br>
How long will UDFR exist?<br>
<br>
UDFR's coverage of media types is somewhat incomplete, e.g., MathML and=
TEI are missing.<br>
<br>
For web engineering purposes, I'd be more confident if IANA would assig=
n URIs to the IANA-registered media types.<br>
<br>
Many<br>
Best,<br>
Richard<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
><br>
> Simon<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Richard Cyganiak <<a href=3D"mailt=
o:rich...@cyganiak.de" target=3D"_blank">rich...@cyganiak.de</a>> wrote:=
<br>
> On 25 Apr 2012, at 14:01, Dan Brickley wrote:<br>
> > There's also an old W3C TAG note on this,<br>
> > <a href=3D"http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/01-uriMediaType-9" tar=
get=3D"_blank">http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/01-uriMediaType-9</a> =A0...=
perhaps worth<br>
> > checking in there for progress?<br>
><br>
> The question of URIs for media types is one that comes up *all the tim=
e*.<br>
><br>
> This TAG Finding from 2002 recommends that IANA mint URIs for media ty=
pes.<br>
><br>
> As far as I know, no progress has been made.<br>
><br>
> Does anyone have a contact in IANA who might give some insights into t=
he obstacles or suggest how progress could be made?<br>
><br>
> Should we approach the TAG and ask them again to lobby IANA?<br>
><br>
> Best,<br>
> Richard<br>
><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>
--f46d043c7b22bf6ef104be840890--