Off the top of my head, it seems like a whole Calagator instance might be overkill just for Occupy Portland, as it would be creating yet another place for people to look for information, apart from other well-established activist calendars in PDX. Can you tell me more about how it would be used and what kinds of events would be put there on an ongoing basis?
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:54 PM, MarkDilley <markwdil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wondering if folks in the tech community here would be interested in > working with me on this. (me no skilz)
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PDX Tech Calendar" group. > To post to this group, send email to pdx-tech-calendar@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > pdx-tech-calendar+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/pdx-tech-calendar?hl=en.
Interest is setting up a Calagator for #Occupy, Portland or otherwise?
I was thinking for all the new Occupy actions starting to happen, if there is an easy way to sort by location.
The need for a focused tight organizing online schedule for that was going to be happening at the location - if there was a flexible and robust way to schedule things that are happening on a daily, hourly basis - that would be helpful.
Might be overkill - but I think there is a need.
p.s. is there a list of activist calendars that you know of? I haven't seen anything near touching the awesomeness of calagator.
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Reid Beels <rei...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Mark,
> Off the top of my head, it seems like a whole Calagator instance might be > overkill just for Occupy Portland, as it would be creating yet another place > for people to look for information, apart from other well-established > activist calendars in PDX. Can you tell me more about how it would be used > and what kinds of events would be put there on an ongoing basis?
> Cheers, > Reid
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:54 PM, MarkDilley <markwdil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Wondering if folks in the tech community here would be interested in >> working with me on this. (me no skilz)
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PDX Tech Calendar" group. >> To post to this group, send email to pdx-tech-calendar@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> pdx-tech-calendar+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/pdx-tech-calendar?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PDX Tech Calendar" group. > To post to this group, send email to pdx-tech-calendar@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > pdx-tech-calendar+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/pdx-tech-calendar?hl=en.
Hey Mark, If you are maybe just fishing for some tech advice/support, I'm totally down - email me off list; I can at least give some knowledgeable feedback. Stoked that such stuff is happening now, though I haven't been following it too closely yet. Cheers, Roby
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:54 PM, MarkDilley <markwdil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wondering if folks in the tech community here would be interested in > working with me on this. (me no skilz)
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PDX Tech Calendar" group. > To post to this group, send email to pdx-tech-calendar@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pdx-tech-calendar+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pdx-tech-calendar?hl=en.
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:33 PM, r baxter <bax...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Mark, > If you are maybe just fishing for some tech advice/support, I'm > totally down - email me off list; I can at least give some > knowledgeable feedback. Stoked that such stuff is happening now, > though I haven't been following it too closely yet. > Cheers, > Roby
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:54 PM, MarkDilley <markwdil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Wondering if folks in the tech community here would be interested in > > working with me on this. (me no skilz)
> > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PDX Tech Calendar" group. > > To post to this group, send email to pdx-tech-calendar@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > pdx-tech-calendar+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/pdx-tech-calendar?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PDX Tech Calendar" group. > To post to this group, send email to pdx-tech-calendar@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > pdx-tech-calendar+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/pdx-tech-calendar?hl=en.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Matt Youell <m...@youell.com> wrote: > On 10/12/11 10:36 PM, Reid Beels wrote: > One thing that came up though was the Google Maps API. Are there any plans > to upgrade to Google Maps API v3? [...] > Calagator is using v2 and as of v3 Google no longer requires an API key. > Just one more thing that might simplify install and configuration.
I really wish that were true, but unfortunately the v3 API still requires an API key for geocoding addresses, which is very important to us.
I tried switching to v3 a few months ago, but found that its geocoding was always wrong, their docs for making maps were badly-written fiction, and the giant angry threads suggested that it wasn't just me. Unfortunately, they've since deprecated the v2 API and claim that they might drop support for it any day, so it'd be good if someone can give v3 another try because they may have since fixed these issues, improved the docs, someone else has published docs for how to use their APIs, or someones published a gem that includes the necessary workarounds.
We currently rely on a heavily-modified vendored copy of "gmaps_on_rails" and a three year-old version of "geokit", so new, better stuff may be available.
I'd be very glad if someone could explore how to use the v3 API for mapping and geocoding with Rails 3.x, and report back their findings, or submit a patch.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Igal Koshevoy <i...@pragmaticraft.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Matt Youell <m...@youell.com> wrote: > > On 10/12/11 10:36 PM, Reid Beels wrote: > > One thing that came up though was the Google Maps API. Are there any > plans > > to upgrade to Google Maps API v3?
> I'd be very glad if someone could explore how to use the v3 API for > mapping and geocoding with Rails 3.x, and report back their findings, > or submit a patch.
Our current geocoding is done with an ancient version of "geokit" and mapping with an ancient, heavily-modified "gmaps4rails". Both of these libraries have been recently updated, so it may be worth trying to upgrade to them.
If someone can take a shot at this doing this against the "rails_3" branch, that'd be great.
Robby and Mark - I have been talking about creating an activist calendar the past several months, and have a pair of developers beginning to really work on it. We could totally use your help! We expect it to go way beyond just Occupy, and way beyond just Portland, when complete. We are using Calagator as a base, have implemented a Full Calendar widget and expect to add faceted filtering, so users can sort by Organization Name, Neighborhood, Topics (climate change, human rights, economy, health care, etc) or sort by Event Type (protest, documentary screening, debate, etc). You can read a bit about it at www.activatepdx.org. I also expect to have a team meeting early next week, so if you want to hear what we are up to and get involved, that could be a great intro. E-mail me if you want to join us!! lind...@activatepdx.org
On 10/19/11 3:19 PM, lind...@activatepdx.org wrote:
> Hi guys! > Robby and Mark - I have been talking about creating an activist > calendar the past several months, and have a pair of developers > beginning to really work on it. We could totally use your help! We > expect it to go way beyond just Occupy, and way beyond just Portland, > when complete. We are using Calagator as a base, have implemented a > Full Calendar widget and expect to add faceted filtering, so users > can sort by Organization Name, Neighborhood, Topics (climate change, > human rights, economy, health care, etc) or sort by Event Type > (protest, documentary screening, debate, etc). You can read a bit > about it at www.activatepdx.org <http://www.activatepdx.org>. I also > expect to have a team meeting early next week, so if you want to hear > what we are up to and get involved, that could be a great intro. > E-mail me if you want to join us!! lind...@activatepdx.org > <mailto:lind...@activatepdx.org>
It went up last Friday but didn't catch on. (It is empty now as the events we entered rolled off.) There is actually quite a use for it IMHO, but the barriers are many. Namely, users must 1. be aware of it, 2. understand the Calagator concept, and 3. find it better and more understandable than Google's calendar widget which seems to be the current favorite of OWS sites.
We set it up as a catch-all (national list of events), with the intent of providing filtering by city as interest increased.
Calagator is definitely a good platform for this. Good luck! (Also you can contact Mark via @OccupyCalendar. Not sure that he's watching this list.)
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:19 PM, <lind...@activatepdx.org> wrote: > We are using Calagator as a base
Please, please, please contribute as many of your changes back as generalized, well-tested code so we can incorporate them into the official Calagator source code. This will let more people befit from the code and ensure that someone other than you is maintaining this as Calagator evolves.
> have implemented a Full Calendar widget
That was one of the first things we built and threw away. A full calendar view doesn't work if you have more than a handful of events because the resulting view is either not viewable at low resolution, or can't show all your events, or can't show the full name of the event, or is a pain to navigate.
For example, your activationcalendar.com's full-month widget forces me to stop, find a clock to figure today's date, then scroll three screens down, then scan sideways a few columns to find today's events -- and you only have about three events a day listed. As you have more events, this becomes even less usable.
I strongly recommend using Calagator's agenda-style view.
> and expect to add faceted > filtering, so users can sort by Organization Name, Neighborhood, Topics > (climate change, human rights, economy, health care, etc) or sort by Event > Type (protest, documentary screening, debate, etc).
Isn't that what the tags already do? E.g. add a link on your homepage that goes to the "economy" tag and add the "economy" tag to appropriate events.
> It went up last Friday but didn't catch on. (It is empty now as the events > we entered rolled off.) There is actually quite a use for it IMHO, but the > barriers are many. Namely, users must 1. be aware of it, 2. understand the > Calagator concept, and 3. find it better and more understandable than > Google's calendar widget which seems to be the current favorite of OWS > sites.
This could be popular, but requires significant social effort to succeed. Normal people care about content -- not wiki-editable calendar concepts or some particular vendor's widgets. You need to become a fanatical user and find some like minded folks to fill this calendar with content, or visitors will leave immediately after seeing "no events". If you and your maintainers aren't enthusiastic about adding content, no one else will catch on. Once you have some minimum amount of content, talk with event organizers, spread the word, pass cards at rallies, put up fliers, etc. Simply putting up a website isn't enough. :)
> We set it up as a catch-all (national list of events), with the intent of > providing filtering by city as interest increased.
This is something I'd like to see as part of the Calagator source code. Please either contribute this or work with us at code sprints to build this.
Easy things that people could contribute to help with this: * Upgrade the "rails_3" branch to a recent "geokit" and "gmaps4rails", that'll add many necessary distance calculation and geographically-specific finder functions. * Put together mockups of how a person would filter events, venues and feeds based on location and distance. They would probably need a UI and query parameters to specify a location to search from, via geopip, browser geolocation or freeform text query that can be geolocated; and a distance. E.g. you'd use this to display events within 50 miles of where you're at.
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Matt Youell<m...@youell.com> wrote: >> See http://occupycalendar.org >> <snip> > This could be popular, but requires significant social effort to > succeed. Normal people care about content -- not wiki-editable > calendar concepts or some particular vendor's widgets. You need to > become a fanatical user and find some like minded folks to fill this > calendar with content, or visitors will leave immediately after seeing > "no events". If you and your maintainers aren't enthusiastic about > adding content, no one else will catch on. Once you have some minimum > amount of content, talk with event organizers, spread the word, pass > cards at rallies, put up fliers, etc. Simply putting up a website > isn't enough. :)
Yeah, that's understood. In this particular case the Occupy cause is something I'm somewhat sympathetic to but not passionate about, so I was content to complete the technical piece and let others do the advocacy bit. I don't know how that effort went, but it apparently hasn't been fanatical enough to garner attention. I know that Calagator itself took a long while to really catch on and for a broad base of people to understand it. So even with fanatical effort it is a long-term process.
BTW, thanks to you folks who have put together Calagator over the years. I was one of those who didn't get it at first, but eventually came around and now don't know what I'd do without it.
There is need and attention for #OccupyPortland calendaring, and this calagator based template - despite it's geo issues - is the best thing yet.
I have been mentioning a Calagator version of calendaring for over a month in the Occupy Google groups. No one in tech responded. Even though there apparently had been this effort for a month. I had no idea until last night when I happened into Igal. I have been pretty heads down lately and not monitoring this lsitsserve for is what is usually an aside stream for me as the tech calendar group
Now, with OP having lost a physical presence , the online needs are far greater. There is no more on-the-ground white board postings for things to keep rolling.
People are not using the webcalendar at the OccupyPDX.org site. It requires submission to the websteam, who do not publish in a timely fashion. The webteam created a purposefully disempowering method of submissions for people and provided for no method of feedback, input or accountability.
These were some of the reasons people chose to use white boards in camp to begin with.
As you are probably aware, OP is in mass confusion from fast growth, diaspora cause by the forced dispersing before communications networks were in order, and the behemoth of a Democratic structure that represents as individuals.
Thus, people, who may or may not have regular web access, post events and actions to a blind email list serve and not as Points of Contact to the webteam - creating accountability and transparency - or better yet to be able to post themselves as individuals.
This creates an unnecessary layer in what is already a mass cluster cluck. We have over 60 areas of communications, for example, and stuff is just not making it through to the website.
The real barriers are that the webteam at OP is committed to hierachy of roles, and not usability of tools, et al. It is self-professed experts in tech holding a bottle neck as a flow model, resulting in artificial scarcity and closed system being run by a few with no identity or two-way communications, let alone open communications to the community.
Portlandwiki is not an option either. The admins are talking constantly about how they can't keep up, but not availing themselves of resources and insisting on arcane process. What passes for an events calendar is a tedious and unwieldly high barrier-to-entry site.
The OP needs a calendar centralized and mobile, readily manageable with low-barrier-to-entry skills, and with OS | OA Community for questions and skill-building such as we have in Portland, but are not able to take advantage of.
I hope I have not rambled to long and too widely for information to be useful.
In summary>. Help. We need a calendar that is accessible, adoptable, and utilizable without having to deal with people who would turn the clock back 30 years to make themselves indispensable. The Occupyportland calendar is close enough. We need it. It needs only to be part of the OccupyPortland website ( and maybe not even that) if possible, and that god aweful hunk of flash crap with it's unresponsive admins taken outta the loop.
Thank you for your time and kindness and what you ahve already given us for a calendar. Now that I know, I will be promoting the crap outta it.
On Oct 19, 9:34 pm, Matt Youell <m...@youell.com> wrote:
> On 10/19/11 5:08 PM, Igal Koshevoy wrote:> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Matt Youell<m...@youell.com> wrote: > >> Seehttp://occupycalendar.org > >> <snip> > > This could be popular, but requires significant social effort to > > succeed. Normal people care about content -- not wiki-editable > > calendar concepts or some particular vendor's widgets. You need to > > become a fanatical user and find some like minded folks to fill this > > calendar with content, or visitors will leave immediately after seeing > > "no events". If you and your maintainers aren't enthusiastic about > > adding content, no one else will catch on. Once you have some minimum > > amount of content, talk with event organizers, spread the word, pass > > cards at rallies, put up fliers, etc. Simply putting up a website > > isn't enough. :)
> Yeah, that's understood. In this particular case the Occupy cause is > something I'm somewhat sympathetic to but not passionate about, so I was > content to complete the technical piece and let others do the advocacy > bit. I don't know how that effort went, but it apparently hasn't been > fanatical enough to garner attention. I know that Calagator itself took > a long while to really catch on and for a broad base of people to > understand it. So even with fanatical effort it is a long-term process.
> BTW, thanks to you folks who have put together Calagator over the years. > I was one of those who didn't get it at first, but eventually came > around and now don't know what I'd do without it.
Teresa, you're a lot closer to some of this than I am. I'm just looking at the existing (google) calendar on OccupyPortland, the "upcoming events" wiki, and http://occupycalendar.org. Sigh.
Getting people to *switch* to the calagator version is probably going to be difficult. Since Calagator is really designed to aggregate events from multiple sources, it probably makes more sense to encourage them to *add* it to their toolbox. Probably the most effective thing would be to request that the occupyportland.org admins include a link to the occupycalendar.org alongside the other calendars, and let the users naturally migrate to what works best.
Here's where fanatical user(s) come into play: for any of these to really be useful, someone needs to garden the content. For a calagator instance, that means importing (or inputting) relevant events that you see listed elsewhere, watching for spam and deleting it (if the site is successful, the spam will come), and encouraging event organizers to include the calagator in their promotional activities. It sounds as if the main advantage of using a calagator in this case is that anyone who cares can contribute, which doesn't seem to be the case for the google calendar.
The better the quality and completeness of the data, the more likely the tool will be embraced. I'm trying to help a little by going through the venues that are there now and attaching addresses or lat/long to the ones that lack them (where I can) -- and adding tags like "pdx," "seattle," "austin," "everywhere," etc. I don't see the tag cloud popping up yet, and I hope that's just because not enough events and venues are tagged. It seems critical to have a way for people to filter by location on this site, and the tags would provide that.
Another thing that will help is for someone to watch the other relevant calendars and transfer events into http://occupycalendar.org/. (I won't keep up with it, I know.)
I've not been participating in the GA meetings or marches, so I would not be the person to promote this. Possibly you are. Or, perhaps it should just be allowed to spread (or not) organically. That's essentially how Calagator.org became popular in the tech community -- fans promoted it, others found it useful and became fans, and so on.
I have to admit I've mostly been tracking what's happening (or coming up) via twitter and Google+.
> There is need and attention for #OccupyPortland calendaring, and this > calagator based template - despite it's geo issues - is the best > thing yet.
> I have been mentioning a Calagator version of calendaring for over a > month in the Occupy Google groups. No one in tech responded. Even > though there apparently had been this effort for a month. I had no > idea until last night when I happened into Igal. I have been pretty > heads down lately and not monitoring this lsitsserve for is what is > usually an aside stream for me as the tech calendar group
> Now, with OP having lost a physical presence , the online needs are > far greater. There is no more on-the-ground white board postings for > things to keep rolling.
> People are not using the webcalendar at the OccupyPDX.org site. It > requires submission to the websteam, who do not publish in a timely > fashion. The webteam created a purposefully disempowering method of > submissions for people and provided for no method of feedback, input > or accountability.
> These were some of the reasons people chose to use white boards in > camp to begin with.
> As you are probably aware, OP is in mass confusion from fast growth, > diaspora cause by the forced dispersing before communications networks > were in order, and the behemoth of a Democratic structure that > represents as individuals.
> Thus, people, who may or may not have regular web access, post events > and actions to a blind email list serve and not as Points of Contact > to the webteam - creating accountability and transparency - or better > yet to be able to post themselves as individuals.
> This creates an unnecessary layer in what is already a mass cluster > cluck. We have over 60 areas of communications, for example, and stuff > is just not making it through to the website.
> The real barriers are that the webteam at OP is committed to hierachy > of roles, and not usability of tools, et al. It is self-professed > experts in tech holding a bottle neck as a flow model, resulting in > artificial scarcity and closed system being run by a few with no > identity or two-way communications, let alone open communications to > the community.
> Portlandwiki is not an option either. The admins are talking > constantly about how they can't keep up, but not availing themselves > of resources and insisting on arcane process. What passes for an > events calendar is a tedious and unwieldly high barrier-to-entry site.
> The OP needs a calendar centralized and mobile, readily manageable > with low-barrier-to-entry skills, and with OS | OA Community for > questions and skill-building such as we have in Portland, but are not > able to take advantage of.
> I hope I have not rambled to long and too widely for information to be > useful.
> In summary>. Help. We need a calendar that is accessible, adoptable, > and utilizable without having to deal with people who would turn the > clock back 30 years to make themselves indispensable. The > Occupyportland calendar is close enough. We need it. It needs only to > be part of the OccupyPortland website ( and maybe not even that) if > possible, and that god aweful hunk of flash crap with it's > unresponsive admins taken outta the loop.
> Thank you for your time and kindness and what you ahve already given > us for a calendar. Now that I know, I will be promoting the crap outta > it.
> On Oct 19, 9:34 pm, Matt Youell <m...@youell.com> wrote: >> On 10/19/11 5:08 PM, Igal Koshevoy wrote:> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Matt Youell<m...@youell.com> wrote: >>>> Seehttp://occupycalendar.org >>>> <snip> >>> This could be popular, but requires significant social effort to >>> succeed. Normal people care about content -- not wiki-editable >>> calendar concepts or some particular vendor's widgets. You need to >>> become a fanatical user and find some like minded folks to fill this >>> calendar with content, or visitors will leave immediately after seeing >>> "no events". If you and your maintainers aren't enthusiastic about >>> adding content, no one else will catch on. Once you have some minimum >>> amount of content, talk with event organizers, spread the word, pass >>> cards at rallies, put up fliers, etc. Simply putting up a website >>> isn't enough. :)
>> Yeah, that's understood. In this particular case the Occupy cause is >> something I'm somewhat sympathetic to but not passionate about, so I was >> content to complete the technical piece and let others do the advocacy >> bit. I don't know how that effort went, but it apparently hasn't been >> fanatical enough to garner attention. I know that Calagator itself took >> a long while to really catch on and for a broad base of people to >> understand it. So even with fanatical effort it is a long-term process.
>> BTW, thanks to you folks who have put together Calagator over the years. >> I was one of those who didn't get it at first, but eventually came >> around and now don't know what I'd do without it.