MRPP: p=0.00000000

84 views
Skip to first unread message

Alin Van

unread,
Jun 5, 2013, 12:32:41 PM6/5/13
to pc-...@googlegroups.com
Dear all,

I have A=0,14 and p=0.00000000
I gues the problem is in too small number of plots (total 37). Cluster Analyses devides them into 6 groups, two of them have only 3 plots each. I have excluded all the rare species and species mentioned only once. Still I can't get any realistic p. Maybe I should use the data transformation?

Best,
Alina

MRPP_112.txt

Bruce McCune

unread,
Jun 6, 2013, 10:36:51 AM6/6/13
to pc-...@googlegroups.com
Alina, I'm not sure what you mean by a realistic p. Your statistics suggest fairly strong differences between groups, despite the sample size.

The p=0.00000000 simply means that the actual calculated value is smaller than can be displayed with the number of digits available. The result could be better stated as p<0.00000001

Bruce McCune
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PC-ORD" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pc-ord+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name=MRPP_112.txt
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=MRPP_112.txt
X-Attachment-Id: bf6020b8-1736-4143-96ea-935676264dd4
Content-ID: <bf6020b8-1736-4143-96ea-935676264dd4>

Alin Van

unread,
Jun 21, 2013, 12:37:37 PM6/21/13
to pc-...@googlegroups.com
Bruce, thank you very much!

I have another question about p values in PC ORD - does the p value as a result of randomization (p = (1+number of runs ≥ observed)/(1+number of randomized runs)) show the significance? in my case the significance of the indicator value in Indicator Specie Analyses, and  if p 0,05  indicator value is not significant?

Many thanks,
Alina

Bruce McCune

unread,
Jun 21, 2013, 8:20:45 PM6/21/13
to pc-...@googlegroups.com
Alina, the special characters you used did not come through. But if p > .05 then the IVmax for that species is not significantlyl higher than expected by chance. (assuming you are applying the traditional cutoff of alpha = .05 for probability of a type I error).

Bruce McCune


At 09:37 AM 6/21/2013, you wrote:
Bruce, thank you very much!

I have another question about p values in PC ORD - does the p value as a result of randomization (p = (1+number of runs ≥ observed)/(1+number of randomized runs)) show the significance? in my case the significance of the indicator value in Indicator Specie Analyses, and  if p≥ 0,05  indicator value is not significant?

Many thanks,
Alina

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages