I don't think it will be BBxM killer. I read through and come to
conclusion that they are different for different purpose and market.
may be you can spell why you think its a BBxM killer... is it just the
price?
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 15:49, Ganak <ganak....@gmail.com> wrote:I don't think it will be BBxM killer. I read through and come to
conclusion that they are different for different purpose and market.
may be you can spell why you think its a BBxM killer... is it just the
price?
For developments refined, it may be that this can not happen, because they have different resources.
But for DIY purposes, uncompromising, many BeagleBoard consumers , PandaBoard can be killer may be because of the price.
But only time will tell us.
On Oct 5, 1:43 pm, "Alberto /* Aleph */ Fabiano" <v...@techberto.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 13:39, Jayabharath Goluguri <jayabhar...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 29, 4:05 pm, "Aleph /* Alberto Fabiano */" <v...@techberto.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Folks,
>
> > > Please, speaking of reality, not on hearsay, there is a price
> > > estimate for PandaBoard?
> > > I saw rumors that the price will be $ 189.00, this is serious?
>
> > Yes. PandaBoard is going to be priced at <$179 at distributor. We will
> > publish more accurate number a few days.
>
> Well, so... for DIY purposes, Panda will be a BBxM Killer... does not
> even have this purpose.
>
> ++[&]s;
>
> ./alberto -fabano
That depends on which customers you look at. DIY and oftware developers will
probably go for pandaboard as it gives you more cpu power and features. But
omap4 chips are not on a market yet so hardware developers will rather stick
with beaglexm as you can use it to develop own hardware which you will later
produce on own PCB because you can buy omap3 chips.
Regards,
--
JID: h...@jabber.org
Website: http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcinjuszkiewicz
--Jay