On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Dan MacDonald <
all...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Again in short: No flash for panda.
>>
>>
>> One could of course take the Nokia plugin and wrap it in enough wrapper
>> libs to make it run on Ubuntu on Panda, even armhf could be wrapped with
>> enough effort...
well, one problem is that many APIs have changed since N900 times...
especially in the GFX and MM areas which are deeply involved in
Flash.. so i doubt you would go anywhere with such a wrapper.
>
>
>
> I'm well aware there is no 'official Adobe' flash player for Panda but ndec
> has publicly stated on here that he has got such a plugin working on the
> Panda- not only that but with ducati video accel too! What he neglected to
> mention is where he obtained his plugin from hence my query.
iirc, i must have said that Flash plugin was developed for actual OMAP
products (using X11). The port to OMAP was done starting with Adobe
ARM Linux Flash.
> I doubt ndec is
> bullshitting us and you can't say he doesn't know what he's talking about!
thanks. i take this as nice feedback!
>
> I detest Flash as much as the next free software advocate but its still
> sadly a necessary evil if you want to watch streamed vids (and access other
> Flash material) on the internet without downloading them first.
at least youtube as the html5 option by now. and a patch was recently
merged in FF to use Gstreamer for video tag. that was done by one OMAP
developer, and was tested on panda with gst-ducati... that only solves
the h/w accelerated decode, not the video rendering, though.
>
> Gnash still isn't ready. On the Panda, playing back SD vids via gnash is
> very jerky when 'windowed' and totally unusable/watchable if you go full
> screen. webm? Forget about it! Just doesn't work under FF or chromium (on
> Panda at least, in my testing)
see above. re: gnash libDCE support could be added in gnash if someone
is brave enough.
>
> I really want to see HTML5/CSS3/webm/ogg etc replace Flash but sadly this
> isn't possible yet and as ever its mainly because of MS dragging their
> heels. They made a big noise about IE 9 (which is sadly won't run on XP and
> earlier OSs) being standards (HTML5) compliant but that turned out to be
> marketing bull as it cannot play HTML5/CSS3 animations as produced by the
> likes of Sencha Animator (the only valid Linux alternative to Flash Pro I'm
> aware of) and Adobe Edge. This is promised for IE 10 but the fact that HTML
> 5/CSS3 anims/apps don't work under IE yet is greatly crippling adoption of
> open web standards. Who (except FOSS die-hards like us maybe) wants a site
> that won't work under the most popular browser?
>
> For all the above reasons, Flash on Panda is still very much needed for a
> complete and satisfactory web experience.
>
> ndec?
i can only have the same answer... flash is not available for
pandaboard community. it's available for BeagleBoard though see
http://tigraphics.blogspot.fr/2012/03/flash11-linux-x11-package-now-available.html.