info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
It might not win him the election, but...Romney won the debate
17 views
Skip to first unread message
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 3:05:45 AM10/4/12
to
"Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
By Michael Shepard and Kristin Jensen on October 03, 2012
Republican Mitt Romney won tonight’s first presidential debate with
President Barack Obama, according to a CNN/ORC International poll of
registered voters who watched the nationally televised event.
Sixty-seven percent of those surveyed said Romney fared better, compared
with 25 percent for Obama, according to results aired on CNN after the
match concluded. Forty-six percent said they found Romney more likeable,
compared with 45 percent for Obama, CNN reported.
The CNN poll interviewed 430 Americans by telephone after the debate and
has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points.
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-10-03/romney-won-first-debate-67-percent-of-voters-tell-cnn
Obama looks like an untested state senator from Illinois.
By Michael Shepard and Kristin Jensen on October 03, 2012
Republican Mitt Romney won tonight’s first presidential debate with
President Barack Obama, according to a CNN/ORC International poll of
registered voters who watched the nationally televised event.
Sixty-seven percent of those surveyed said Romney fared better, compared
with 25 percent for Obama, according to results aired on CNN after the
match concluded. Forty-six percent said they found Romney more likeable,
compared with 45 percent for Obama, CNN reported.
The CNN poll interviewed 430 Americans by telephone after the debate and
has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points.
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-10-03/romney-won-first-debate-67-percent-of-voters-tell-cnn
Obama looks like an untested state senator from Illinois.
jim
Oct 4, 2012, 7:34:38 AM10/4/12
to
George Plimpton wrote:
>
> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
wiped the floor with his ass.
Most of the dumb wrestling fans at least have
an inkling that the show is staged.
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 10:30:38 AM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>>
>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>
>
> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
> wiped the floor with his ass.
You're an idiot.
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>>
>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>
>
> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
> wiped the floor with his ass.
jim
Oct 4, 2012, 11:29:27 AM10/4/12
to
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 11:43:48 AM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 8:29 AM, jim wrote:
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>>>
>>>
>>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
>>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
>>> wiped the floor with his ass.
>>
>> You're an idiot.
>
> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
I knew you wouldn't be able to maintain your phony veneer of dry,
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>>>
>>>
>>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
>>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
>>> wiped the floor with his ass.
>>
>> You're an idiot.
>
> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
academic detachment. "Obama would have wiped the floor with his ass" -
not very academic sounding, jimmie.
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 11:46:19 AM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 5:34 AM, jim wrote:
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>>
>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>
>
> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
Really?
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>>
>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>
>
> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
> wiped the floor with his ass.
plans?
> Most of the dumb wrestling fans at least have
> an inkling that the show is staged.
Sad.
Go lick your wounds, shitbag, you disgust me.
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 11:53:38 AM10/4/12
to
liberal."
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 11:53:58 AM10/4/12
to
debate.
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 11:58:53 AM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 9:29 AM, jim wrote:
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>>>
>>>
>>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
>>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
>>> wiped the floor with his ass.
>>
>> You're an idiot.
>
> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
Haters of democracy are so pathetic.
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>>>
>>>
>>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
>>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
>>> wiped the floor with his ass.
>>
>> You're an idiot.
>
> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
Thanks for showing us ALL who and what you are.
Not that there was any doubt going in, mind you...
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 11:59:20 AM10/4/12
to
jim
Oct 4, 2012, 12:12:26 PM10/4/12
to
no hope or change wrote:
>
> On 10/4/2012 9:29 AM, jim wrote:
> >
> >
> > George Plimpton wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> George Plimpton wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
> >>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
> >>> wiped the floor with his ass.
> >>
> >> You're an idiot.
> >
> > Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>
> Haters of democracy are so pathetic.
You call a sham like pro wrestling a democracy?
> >
> >
> > George Plimpton wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> George Plimpton wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
> >>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
> >>> wiped the floor with his ass.
> >>
> >> You're an idiot.
> >
> > Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>
> Haters of democracy are so pathetic.
jim
Oct 4, 2012, 12:13:18 PM10/4/12
to
George Plimpton wrote:
> >>
> >> You're an idiot.
> >
> > Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>
> I knew you wouldn't be able to maintain your phony veneer of dry,
> academic detachment. "Obama would have wiped the floor with his ass" -
> not very academic sounding, jimmie.
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 12:46:33 PM10/4/12
to
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 12:47:42 PM10/4/12
to
extremist partisan. Of course, I knew that all along - could see right
through the façade.
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 1:00:40 PM10/4/12
to
You are exterminable treasonous vermin!
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 1:01:33 PM10/4/12
to
first debate loss for Obama, enjoy.
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 1:23:50 PM10/4/12
to
jim
Oct 4, 2012, 1:23:56 PM10/4/12
to
George Plimpton wrote:
>
> On 10/4/2012 9:13 AM, jim wrote:
> >
> >
> > George Plimpton wrote:
> >
> >>>>
> >>>> You're an idiot.
> >>>
> >>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
> >>
> >> I knew you wouldn't be able to maintain your phony veneer of dry,
> >> academic detachment. "Obama would have wiped the floor with his ass" -
> >> not very academic sounding, jimmie.
> >
> > That is because it sounds like pro wrestling
>
> Your façade is shattered, jimmie. We know you're just an angry
> extremist partisan.
pro wrestling fan.
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 1:26:16 PM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 10:13 AM, jim wrote:
>
>
>
>
�We are going to be gifted with a health care plan that we are forced to
purchase, and fined if we don�t,� Bellar continues, �signed by a
president who smokes, with funding administered by a treasury chief who
didn't pay his taxes, by a government which has already bankrupted
Social Security and Medicare, all to be overseen by a surgeon general
who is obese, and financed by a country that�s broke.�
jim
Oct 4, 2012, 1:27:20 PM10/4/12
to
no hope or change wrote:
>
pro wrestling is real.
jim
Oct 4, 2012, 1:28:11 PM10/4/12
to
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 1:39:42 PM10/4/12
to
Sounds like - no, it's *confirmed* - you are an angry far-left lunatic
fringe extremist.
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 1:40:31 PM10/4/12
to
That was a really lame analogy, jimmie. You're the expert in lame
analogies.
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 1:41:26 PM10/4/12
to
All you did was tear down the façade, jimmie.
jim
Oct 4, 2012, 1:48:28 PM10/4/12
to
George Plimpton wrote:
>
> On 10/4/2012 10:23 AM, jim wrote:
> >
> >
> > George Plimpton wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/4/2012 9:13 AM, jim wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> George Plimpton wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You're an idiot.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
> >>>>
> >>>> I knew you wouldn't be able to maintain your phony veneer of dry,
> >>>> academic detachment. "Obama would have wiped the floor with his ass" -
> >>>> not very academic sounding, jimmie.
> >>>
> >>> That is because it sounds like pro wrestling
> >>
> >> Your façade is shattered, jimmie. We know you're just an angry
> >> extremist partisan.
> >
> > Sounds like you really are a die hard
> > pro wrestling fan.
>
> Never seen it.
>
> Sounds like - no, it's *confirmed* - you are an angry far-left lunatic
> fringe extremist.
your passion for pro wrestling?
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 2:11:07 PM10/4/12
to
Our nations future however is, hth.
You consummate ass.
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 2:11:24 PM10/4/12
to
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 2:12:43 PM10/4/12
to
But it's his rhetoric that jerked his persona out for all to see.
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 2:13:28 PM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 11:48 AM, jim wrote:
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/2012 10:23 AM, jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/4/2012 9:13 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I knew you wouldn't be able to maintain your phony veneer of dry,
>>>>>> academic detachment. "Obama would have wiped the floor with his ass" -
>>>>>> not very academic sounding, jimmie.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is because it sounds like pro wrestling
>>>>
>>>> Your façade is shattered, jimmie. We know you're just an angry
>>>> extremist partisan.
>>>
>>> Sounds like you really are a die hard
>>> pro wrestling fan.
>>
>> Never seen it.
>
> Oh OK, we'll just keep it your little secret.
Not a secret any more is your hatred for America.
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/2012 10:23 AM, jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/4/2012 9:13 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I knew you wouldn't be able to maintain your phony veneer of dry,
>>>>>> academic detachment. "Obama would have wiped the floor with his ass" -
>>>>>> not very academic sounding, jimmie.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is because it sounds like pro wrestling
>>>>
>>>> Your façade is shattered, jimmie. We know you're just an angry
>>>> extremist partisan.
>>>
>>> Sounds like you really are a die hard
>>> pro wrestling fan.
>>
>> Never seen it.
>
> Oh OK, we'll just keep it your little secret.
>>
>> Sounds like - no, it's *confirmed* - you are an angry far-left lunatic
>> fringe extremist.
>
> Have there been others who have tried to expose
> your passion for pro wrestling?
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 2:26:48 PM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 10:48 AM, jim wrote:
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/2012 10:23 AM, jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/4/2012 9:13 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I knew you wouldn't be able to maintain your phony veneer of dry,
>>>>>> academic detachment. "Obama would have wiped the floor with his ass" -
>>>>>> not very academic sounding, jimmie.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is because it sounds like pro wrestling
>>>>
>>>> Your façade is shattered, jimmie. We know you're just an angry
>>>> extremist partisan.
>>>
>>> Sounds like you really are a die hard
>>> pro wrestling fan.
>>
>> Never seen it.
>
> Oh OK, we'll just keep it your little secret.
Keep trying, jimmie. You've done nothing but swing and miss so far.
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/2012 10:23 AM, jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/4/2012 9:13 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I knew you wouldn't be able to maintain your phony veneer of dry,
>>>>>> academic detachment. "Obama would have wiped the floor with his ass" -
>>>>>> not very academic sounding, jimmie.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is because it sounds like pro wrestling
>>>>
>>>> Your façade is shattered, jimmie. We know you're just an angry
>>>> extremist partisan.
>>>
>>> Sounds like you really are a die hard
>>> pro wrestling fan.
>>
>> Never seen it.
>
> Oh OK, we'll just keep it your little secret.
>>
>> Sounds like - no, it's *confirmed* - you are an angry far-left lunatic
>> fringe extremist.
>
> Have there been others who have tried to expose
> your passion for pro wrestling?
jimmie?
jim
Oct 4, 2012, 2:51:49 PM10/4/12
to
George Plimpton wrote:
>
> On 10/4/2012 10:28 AM, jim wrote:
> >
> >
> > no hope or change wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/4/2012 10:12 AM, jim wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> no hope or change wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10/4/2012 9:29 AM, jim wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
> >>>>>>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
> >>>>>>> wiped the floor with his ass.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You're an idiot.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
> >>>>
> >>>> Haters of democracy are so pathetic.
> >>>
> >>> You call a sham like pro wrestling a democracy?
> >>
> >> You dare to compare pro wrestling to the American democracy?
> >
> > I guess I struck a nerve.
>
> No. But I'm sure you'll remain deluded that you did.
>
> All you did was tear down the façade, jimmie.
Presidential elections are all about facade.
If Romney pulls way ahead in the polls, then in
the next debate he will be the one stammering and
looking at his shoes all evening. The whole thing
is choreographed to keep moron pro wrestling
fans mesmerized and coming back for more.
jim
Oct 4, 2012, 2:54:16 PM10/4/12
to
might learn something about how US presidential
politics works. But more likely you'll just become
a fan of some dumb wrestler...
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 2:56:29 PM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 11:51 AM, jim wrote:
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/2012 10:28 AM, jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> no hope or change wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/4/2012 10:12 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> no hope or change wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/4/2012 9:29 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
>>>>>>>>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
>>>>>>>>> wiped the floor with his ass.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Haters of democracy are so pathetic.
>>>>>
>>>>> You call a sham like pro wrestling a democracy?
>>>>
>>>> You dare to compare pro wrestling to the American democracy?
>>>
>>> I guess I struck a nerve.
>>
>> No. But I'm sure you'll remain deluded that you did.
>>
>> All you did was tear down the façade, jimmie.
>
> Somebody should tear down the facade...
*YOUR* façade, jimmie, you ham hock - your façade of being a calm,
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/2012 10:28 AM, jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> no hope or change wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/4/2012 10:12 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> no hope or change wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/4/2012 9:29 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
>>>>>>>>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
>>>>>>>>> wiped the floor with his ass.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Haters of democracy are so pathetic.
>>>>>
>>>>> You call a sham like pro wrestling a democracy?
>>>>
>>>> You dare to compare pro wrestling to the American democracy?
>>>
>>> I guess I struck a nerve.
>>
>> No. But I'm sure you'll remain deluded that you did.
>>
>> All you did was tear down the façade, jimmie.
>
> Somebody should tear down the facade...
detached academic type blabbering about economics and politics as if you
actually know anything about them, when in fact all you're doing is
trying to advance an extremist left-wing agenda.
>
> Presidential elections are all about facade.
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 3:01:33 PM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 11:54 AM, jim wrote:
>
>
> no hope or change wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/2012 11:27 AM, jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> no hope or change wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/4/2012 10:13 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I knew you wouldn't be able to maintain your phony veneer of dry,
>>>>>> academic detachment. "Obama would have wiped the floor with his ass" -
>>>>>> not very academic sounding, jimmie.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is because it sounds like pro wrestling
>>>>
>>>> It's really confirmational to see you spill your hateful bilge after the
>>>> first debate loss for Obama, enjoy.
>>>
>>> "hateful bilge"? I suppose you actually think
>>> pro wrestling is real.
>>
>> I don't bother with "pro wrestling", it's of no interest to me.
>>
>> Our nations future however is, hth.
>
> You should take a look at pro wrestling.
You can enjoy it all you like without having others tune in with you.
>
>
> no hope or change wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/2012 11:27 AM, jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> no hope or change wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/4/2012 10:13 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I knew you wouldn't be able to maintain your phony veneer of dry,
>>>>>> academic detachment. "Obama would have wiped the floor with his ass" -
>>>>>> not very academic sounding, jimmie.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is because it sounds like pro wrestling
>>>>
>>>> It's really confirmational to see you spill your hateful bilge after the
>>>> first debate loss for Obama, enjoy.
>>>
>>> "hateful bilge"? I suppose you actually think
>>> pro wrestling is real.
>>
>> I don't bother with "pro wrestling", it's of no interest to me.
>>
>> Our nations future however is, hth.
>
> You should take a look at pro wrestling.
jim
Oct 4, 2012, 3:06:48 PM10/4/12
to
>
> >
> > Presidential elections are all about facade.
>
> You're not knowledgeable, jimmie.
see the facade.
When you gonna catch on that pro wrestling is a
sham?
Baxter
Oct 4, 2012, 3:13:39 PM10/4/12
to
-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"jim" <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m...@mwt.net> wrote in message
news:m_idnZrU2NLBRvDN...@bright.net...
(or trying to buy it).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"jim" <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m...@mwt.net> wrote in message
news:m_idnZrU2NLBRvDN...@bright.net...
>
> You should take a look at pro wrestling. You
> might learn something about how US presidential
> politics works. But more likely you'll just become
> a fan of some dumb wrestler...
As far as that goes, do note that Linda McMahon is running for the Senate
> You should take a look at pro wrestling. You
> might learn something about how US presidential
> politics works. But more likely you'll just become
> a fan of some dumb wrestler...
(or trying to buy it).
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 3:24:22 PM10/4/12
to
>>>
>>> Presidential elections are all about facade.
>>
>> You're not knowledgeable, jimmie.
>
> Oh right you have to be "knowledgeable" to
> see the facade.
that you had only a façade, jimmie.
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 4:07:56 PM10/4/12
to
jim
Oct 4, 2012, 4:32:27 PM10/4/12
to
George Plimpton wrote:
> >>
> >> *YOUR* façade, jimmie, you ham hock - your façade of being a calm,
> >> detached academic type blabbering about economics and politics as if you
> >> actually know anything about them, when in fact all you're doing is
> >> trying to advance an extremist left-wing agenda.
> >
> > You think I should become a wrestling fan.
>
> I think your façade as a calm, detached analyst is blown to shit, jimmie.
>
You might also give some thought to the facade of the
two phony opponents in last night's staged wrestling bout.
Gunner
Oct 4, 2012, 4:52:13 PM10/4/12
to
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:28:11 -0500, jim <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m...@mwt.net>
Or stepped on your dick.
The jury is still out on that one.
Gunner
--
You just opened the window for a glimpse at the liberal mindset. You
people think, for some unknown reason, that since you are infinitely
more "intelligient" than the "average" citizen then it's not only your
God given right, but a responsibilty to tell everyone else how they
should live, spend their money, what to eat, what to drive, how much
to eat and drink and what to set your thermostat to. Of course, those
same rules don't apply to you because you, being a highly educated
individual with a degree in the "arts", don't have to abide by those
same rules. Thank GOD you are in the minority.
"Robert Westergrom"
The jury is still out on that one.
Gunner
--
You just opened the window for a glimpse at the liberal mindset. You
people think, for some unknown reason, that since you are infinitely
more "intelligient" than the "average" citizen then it's not only your
God given right, but a responsibilty to tell everyone else how they
should live, spend their money, what to eat, what to drive, how much
to eat and drink and what to set your thermostat to. Of course, those
same rules don't apply to you because you, being a highly educated
individual with a degree in the "arts", don't have to abide by those
same rules. Thank GOD you are in the minority.
"Robert Westergrom"
Gunner
Oct 4, 2012, 4:53:19 PM10/4/12
to
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:51:49 -0500, jim <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m...@mwt.net>
Id have to disagree. But then..Ive been watching such debates since
the mid 1950s
the mid 1950s
jim
Oct 4, 2012, 4:56:40 PM10/4/12
to
Gunner wrote:
> >
> >Presidential elections are all about facade.
> >If Romney pulls way ahead in the polls, then in
> >the next debate he will be the one stammering and
> >looking at his shoes all evening. The whole thing
> >is choreographed to keep moron pro wrestling
> >fans mesmerized and coming back for more.
>
> Id have to disagree. But then..Ive been watching such debates since
> the mid 1950s
>
>
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 5:14:54 PM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 1:32 PM, jim wrote:
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> *YOUR* façade, jimmie, you ham hock - your façade of being a calm,
>>>> detached academic type blabbering about economics and politics as if you
>>>> actually know anything about them, when in fact all you're doing is
>>>> trying to advance an extremist left-wing agenda.
>>>
>>> You think I should become a wrestling fan.
>>
>> I think your façade as a calm, detached analyst is blown to shit, jimmie.
>>
>
> If it is real important to you to think that - go ahead.
It's a fact that your façade as a calm, detached analyst is blown to
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> *YOUR* façade, jimmie, you ham hock - your façade of being a calm,
>>>> detached academic type blabbering about economics and politics as if you
>>>> actually know anything about them, when in fact all you're doing is
>>>> trying to advance an extremist left-wing agenda.
>>>
>>> You think I should become a wrestling fan.
>>
>> I think your façade as a calm, detached analyst is blown to shit, jimmie.
>>
>
> If it is real important to you to think that - go ahead.
shit, jimmie.
> You might also give some thought to the facade of the
> two phony opponents in last night's staged wrestling bout.
extremist *SOME MORE*, jimmie! Too funny.
Homer Stille Cummings
Oct 4, 2012, 5:18:52 PM10/4/12
to
political debates in the mid 1950s. You weren't even watching them in
the mid 1960s.
travesty of the game [7.08(i)]
Oct 4, 2012, 5:29:18 PM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 1:53 PM, Gunner wrote:
Too_Many_Tools
Oct 4, 2012, 5:41:34 PM10/4/12
to
On Oct 4, 2:06 am, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>
> By Michael Shepard and Kristin Jensen on October 03, 2012
> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>
>
> Forty-six percent said they found Romney more likeable,
> compared with 45 percent for Obama, CNN reported.
>
> The CNN poll interviewed 430 Americans by telephone after the debate and
> has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points.
>
Thanks for providing the rope to hang yourself.
One percentage point difference with a +/- 4.5 point margin of error.
Romney won nothing...but the contempt of America.
Laugh..laugh..laugh...
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
Oct 4, 2012, 5:43:19 PM10/4/12
to
On Oct 4, 2:06 am, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>
> By Michael Shepard and Kristin Jensen on October 03, 2012
>
> Republican Mitt Romney won tonight’s first presidential debate with
> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>
> By Michael Shepard and Kristin Jensen on October 03, 2012
>
> President Barack Obama, according to a CNN/ORC International poll of
> registered voters who watched the nationally televised event.
>
> Sixty-seven percent of those surveyed said Romney fared better, compared
> with 25 percent for Obama, according to results aired on CNN after the
> match concluded. Forty-six percent said they found Romney more likeable,
> compared with 45 percent for Obama, CNN reported.
>
> The CNN poll interviewed 430 Americans by telephone after the debate and
> has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points.
>
> http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-10-03/romney-won-first-debate-6...
>
> The CNN poll interviewed 430 Americans by telephone after the debate and
> has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points.
>
>
> Obama looks like an untested state senator from Illinois.
Does your little woman do liberals 67% of the time?
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
Oct 4, 2012, 5:45:07 PM10/4/12
to
On Oct 4, 10:29 am, jim <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m...@mwt.net> wrote:
> George Plimpton wrote:
>
> > On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>
> > On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>
> > > George Plimpton wrote:
>
> > >> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>
>
> > >> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>
> > > Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
> > > Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
> > > wiped the floor with his ass.
>
> > You're an idiot.
>
> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
LOL...it comes from having that enormous amount of metal in the belt
> > > Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
> > > wiped the floor with his ass.
>
> > You're an idiot.
>
> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
hanging over your junk..ready to sever it at any time.
TMT
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 5:46:12 PM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 2:41 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> On Oct 4, 2:06 am, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>>
>> By Michael Shepard and Kristin Jensen on October 03, 2012
>>
>> Forty-six percent said they found Romney more likeable,
>> compared with 45 percent for Obama, CNN reported.
>>
>> The CNN poll interviewed 430 Americans by telephone after the debate and
>> has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points.
>>
>
> Thanks for providing the rope to hang yourself.
>
> One percentage point difference with a +/- 4.5 point margin of error.
You don't understand statistical sampling.
> On Oct 4, 2:06 am, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>>
>> By Michael Shepard and Kristin Jensen on October 03, 2012
>>
>> Forty-six percent said they found Romney more likeable,
>> compared with 45 percent for Obama, CNN reported.
>>
>> The CNN poll interviewed 430 Americans by telephone after the debate and
>> has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points.
>>
>
> Thanks for providing the rope to hang yourself.
>
> One percentage point difference with a +/- 4.5 point margin of error.
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 5:47:17 PM10/4/12
to
is the job of government to take care of people.
Too_Many_Tools
Oct 4, 2012, 5:50:28 PM10/4/12
to
On Oct 4, 3:53 pm, Gunner <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:51:49 -0500, jim <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m...@mwt.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >George Plimpton wrote:
>
> >> On 10/4/2012 10:28 AM, jim wrote:
>
> >> > no hope or change wrote:
>
> >> >> On 10/4/2012 10:12 AM, jim wrote:
>
> >> >>> no hope or change wrote:
>
> >> >>>> On 10/4/2012 9:29 AM, jim wrote:
>
> >> >>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>>>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>
> >> >>>>>>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
> >> >>>>>>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
> >> >>>>>>> wiped the floor with his ass.
>
> >> >>>>>> You're an idiot.
>
> >> >>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>
> >> >>>> Haters of democracy are so pathetic.
>
> >> >>> You call a sham like pro wrestling a democracy?
>
> >> >> You dare to compare pro wrestling to the American democracy?
>
> >> > I guess I struck a nerve.
>
> >> No. But I'm sure you'll remain deluded that you did.
>
> >> All you did was tear down the fa ade, jimmie.
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:51:49 -0500, jim <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m...@mwt.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >George Plimpton wrote:
>
> >> On 10/4/2012 10:28 AM, jim wrote:
>
> >> > no hope or change wrote:
>
> >> >> On 10/4/2012 10:12 AM, jim wrote:
>
> >> >>> no hope or change wrote:
>
> >> >>>> On 10/4/2012 9:29 AM, jim wrote:
>
> >> >>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>>>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>
> >> >>>>>>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
> >> >>>>>>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
> >> >>>>>>> wiped the floor with his ass.
>
> >> >>>>>> You're an idiot.
>
> >> >>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>
> >> >>>> Haters of democracy are so pathetic.
>
> >> >>> You call a sham like pro wrestling a democracy?
>
> >> >> You dare to compare pro wrestling to the American democracy?
>
> >> > I guess I struck a nerve.
>
> >> No. But I'm sure you'll remain deluded that you did.
>
>
> >Somebody should tear down the facade...
>
> >Presidential elections are all about facade.
> >If Romney pulls way ahead in the polls, then in
> >the next debate he will be the one stammering and
> >looking at his shoes all evening. The whole thing
> >is choreographed to keep moron pro wrestling
> >fans mesmerized and coming back for more.
>
> Id have to disagree. But then..Ive been watching such debates since
> the mid 1950s
>
> Gunner
>
> --
> You just opened the window for a glimpse at the liberal mindset. You
> people think, for some unknown reason, that since you are infinitely
> more "intelligient" than the "average" citizen then it's not only your
> God given right, but a responsibilty to tell everyone else how they
> should live, spend their money, what to eat, what to drive, how much
> to eat and drink and what to set your thermostat to. Of course, those
> same rules don't apply to you because you, being a highly educated
> individual with a degree in the "arts", don't have to abide by those
> same rules. Thank GOD you are in the minority.
> "Robert Westergrom"- Hide quoted text -
> >Somebody should tear down the facade...
>
> >Presidential elections are all about facade.
> >If Romney pulls way ahead in the polls, then in
> >the next debate he will be the one stammering and
> >looking at his shoes all evening. The whole thing
> >is choreographed to keep moron pro wrestling
> >fans mesmerized and coming back for more.
>
> Id have to disagree. But then..Ive been watching such debates since
> the mid 1950s
>
> Gunner
>
> --
> You just opened the window for a glimpse at the liberal mindset. You
> people think, for some unknown reason, that since you are infinitely
> more "intelligient" than the "average" citizen then it's not only your
> God given right, but a responsibilty to tell everyone else how they
> should live, spend their money, what to eat, what to drive, how much
> to eat and drink and what to set your thermostat to. Of course, those
> same rules don't apply to you because you, being a highly educated
> individual with a degree in the "arts", don't have to abide by those
> same rules. Thank GOD you are in the minority.
>
> - Show quoted text -
So says Mark "Liar of the Day" Wieber....who is 58 years old.
Must be that home school math that they teach you conservatives.
Laugh..laugh..laugh..
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
Oct 4, 2012, 5:53:34 PM10/4/12
to
On Oct 4, 4:46 pm, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> On 10/4/2012 2:41 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>
> > On Oct 4, 2:06 am, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> >> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>
> >> By Michael Shepard and Kristin Jensen on October 03, 2012
>
> >> Forty-six percent said they found Romney more likeable,
> >> compared with 45 percent for Obama, CNN repor
>
> On 10/4/2012 2:41 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>
> > On Oct 4, 2:06 am, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> >> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>
> >> By Michael Shepard and Kristin Jensen on October 03, 2012
>
> >> Forty-six percent said they found Romney more likeable,
> >> compared with 45 percent for Obama, CNN repor
>
> >> The CNN poll interviewed 430 Americans by telephone after the debate and
> >> has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points.
>
> > Thanks for providing the rope to hang yourself.
>
> > One percentage point difference with a +/- 4.5 point margin of error.
>
> You don't understand statistical sampling.
You do not understand "little women".
> >> has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points.
>
> > Thanks for providing the rope to hang yourself.
>
> > One percentage point difference with a +/- 4.5 point margin of error.
>
> You don't understand statistical sampling.
TMT
Julaine Schexnayder
Oct 4, 2012, 5:58:39 PM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 1:53 PM, Gunner wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/GunnerAsch/info
You were born November 11, 1953. You weren't watching any debates in
the mid 1950s. You weren't even watching them in the mid 1960s. In the
fall of 1960, you were not quite seven years old. You didn't watch the
Kennedy-Nixon debates.
Gunner
Oct 4, 2012, 6:15:36 PM10/4/12
to
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:56:40 -0500, jim <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m...@mwt.net>
wrote:
>
>
Never watch it. Its a waste of my time.
But Jim..your opinion is indeed noted.
wrote:
>
>
But Jim..your opinion is indeed noted.
Gunner
Oct 4, 2012, 6:17:44 PM10/4/12
to
Even when you post as Homo.
Nym change: 3 minutes 45 seconds
I think that's one of your records to date
<plink>
jim
Oct 4, 2012, 6:23:21 PM10/4/12
to
George Plimpton wrote:
>
> > You might also give some thought to the facade of the
> > two phony opponents in last night's staged wrestling bout.
>
> Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! You just gave yourself away as a far-left
> extremist *SOME MORE*, jimmie! Too funny.
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 6:41:18 PM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 12:51 PM, jim wrote:
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/2012 10:28 AM, jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> no hope or change wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/4/2012 10:12 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> no hope or change wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/4/2012 9:29 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
>>>>>>>>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
>>>>>>>>> wiped the floor with his ass.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Haters of democracy are so pathetic.
>>>>>
>>>>> You call a sham like pro wrestling a democracy?
>>>>
>>>> You dare to compare pro wrestling to the American democracy?
>>>
>>> I guess I struck a nerve.
>>
>> No. But I'm sure you'll remain deluded that you did.
>>
>> All you did was tear down the fa�ade, jimmie.
>
>
> George Plimpton wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/2012 10:28 AM, jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> no hope or change wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/4/2012 10:12 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> no hope or change wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/4/2012 9:29 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
>>>>>>>>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
>>>>>>>>> wiped the floor with his ass.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Haters of democracy are so pathetic.
>>>>>
>>>>> You call a sham like pro wrestling a democracy?
>>>>
>>>> You dare to compare pro wrestling to the American democracy?
>>>
>>> I guess I struck a nerve.
>>
>> No. But I'm sure you'll remain deluded that you did.
>>
>
> Somebody should tear down the facade...
Oh yesh, most definitely!
> Somebody should tear down the facade...
> Presidential elections are all about facade.
> If Romney pulls way ahead in the polls, then in
> the next debate he will be the one stammering and
> looking at his shoes all evening.
But you can hope for that, dippy.
> The whole thing
> is choreographed to keep moron pro wrestling
> fans mesmerized and coming back for more.
a "nixon" in his teleprompter-free debate last night.
Sour grapes.
Go make some balsamic vinegar, dippy.
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 6:43:03 PM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 12:54 PM, jim wrote:
>
>
> no hope or change wrote:
>>
>
>
> no hope or change wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/2012 11:27 AM, jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> no hope or change wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/4/2012 10:13 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> no hope or change wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/4/2012 10:13 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I knew you wouldn't be able to maintain your phony veneer of dry,
>>>>>> academic detachment. "Obama would have wiped the floor with his ass" -
>>>>>> not very academic sounding, jimmie.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is because it sounds like pro wrestling
>>>>
>>>> It's really confirmational to see you spill your hateful bilge after the
>>>> first debate loss for Obama, enjoy.
>>>
>>> "hateful bilge"? I suppose you actually think
>>> pro wrestling is real.
>>
>> I don't bother with "pro wrestling", it's of no interest to me.
>>
>> Our nations future however is, hth.
>
>>>>>> academic detachment. "Obama would have wiped the floor with his ass" -
>>>>>> not very academic sounding, jimmie.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is because it sounds like pro wrestling
>>>>
>>>> It's really confirmational to see you spill your hateful bilge after the
>>>> first debate loss for Obama, enjoy.
>>>
>>> "hateful bilge"? I suppose you actually think
>>> pro wrestling is real.
>>
>> I don't bother with "pro wrestling", it's of no interest to me.
>>
>> Our nations future however is, hth.
>
> You should take a look at pro wrestling.
Pass, I'm not a child anymore. And George ain't "gorgeous"...
> You might learn something about how US presidential
> politics works.
> But more likely you'll just become
> a fan of some dumb wrestler...
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 6:44:35 PM10/4/12
to
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 6:47:49 PM10/4/12
to
lacking the common sense to back out of it?
Here we go again...
>>
>>>
>>> Presidential elections are all about facade.
>>
>> You're not knowledgeable, jimmie.
>
> Oh right you have to be "knowledgeable" to
> see the facade.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaLQMs_VDLw
> When you gonna catch on that pro wrestling is a
> sham?
Nice try on the distraction and deflection subject fizz jimmie, but it's
falling flat on your empty head, lol!
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 6:49:13 PM10/4/12
to
Do they " think like you do jimmie"?
Are you "thinking for 'em"?
LOLOL!!!!
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 6:50:26 PM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 1:13 PM, Baxter wrote:
> Linda McMahon is running for the Senate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvnAE8olUxU
> Linda McMahon is running for the Senate
BAXTURD's PETER METER
|=====|
| |
| 9 |
| | ,-%/%|
| 6 | _,-' \//%\
| | _,-' \%/|%
| 3 | / / ) __,-- /%\
| | \__/_,-'%(% ; %)%
| 0 | %\%, %\
|=====| '--%'
__________________________________________________________________________
"At my age, I don't need balls. I'm done with the procreation stuff."
"I've been around pimps before (as a "slumlord")..."
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 6:54:21 PM10/4/12
to
Scowler in Chief's devastatingly Nixonian debate loss...
enjoy!
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 6:57:03 PM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 3:41 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> Romney won nothing...but the contempt of America.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-04/romney-won-first-debate-67-percent-of-voters-tell-cnn.html
> Romney won nothing...but the contempt of America.
Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 6:57:29 PM10/4/12
to
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 6:57:49 PM10/4/12
to
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 6:59:23 PM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 3:50 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> So says Mark "Liar of the Day" Wieber....who is 58 years old.
How old are you, fuckwit?
> So says Mark "Liar of the Day" Wieber....who is 58 years old.
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 6:59:49 PM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 3:53 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> You do not understand "little women".
You have some odd kinks, but I would have not suspected dwarves were one
> You do not understand "little women".
of them...
no hope or change
Oct 4, 2012, 7:00:25 PM10/4/12
to
On 10/4/2012 3:58 PM, Julaine Schexnayder wrote:
> On 10/4/2012 1:53 PM, Gunner wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:51:49 -0500, jim <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m...@mwt.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/4/2012 10:28 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> no hope or change wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/4/2012 10:12 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> no hope or change wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2012 9:29 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
>>>>>>>>>>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
>>>>>>>>>>> wiped the floor with his ass.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Haters of democracy are so pathetic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You call a sham like pro wrestling a democracy?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You dare to compare pro wrestling to the American democracy?
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess I struck a nerve.
>>>>
>>>> No. But I'm sure you'll remain deluded that you did.
>>>>
>>>> All you did was tear down the fa�ade, jimmie.
> On 10/4/2012 1:53 PM, Gunner wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:51:49 -0500, jim <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m...@mwt.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/4/2012 10:28 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> no hope or change wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/4/2012 10:12 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> no hope or change wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2012 9:29 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
>>>>>>>>>>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
>>>>>>>>>>> wiped the floor with his ass.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Haters of democracy are so pathetic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You call a sham like pro wrestling a democracy?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You dare to compare pro wrestling to the American democracy?
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess I struck a nerve.
>>>>
>>>> No. But I'm sure you'll remain deluded that you did.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Somebody should tear down the facade...
>>>
>>> Presidential elections are all about facade.
>>> If Romney pulls way ahead in the polls, then in
>>> the next debate he will be the one stammering and
>>> looking at his shoes all evening. The whole thing
>>> is choreographed to keep moron pro wrestling
>>> fans mesmerized and coming back for more.
>>
>> Id have to disagree. But then..Ive been watching such debates since
>> the mid 1950s
>
> No, you haven't.
>
> https://www.facebook.com/GunnerAsch/info
>
> You were born November 11, 1953. You weren't watching any debates in the
> mid 1950s. You weren't even watching them in the mid 1960s. In the fall
> of 1960, you were not quite seven years old. You didn't watch the
> Kennedy-Nixon debates.
>
They're on youtube you know..
>>> Somebody should tear down the facade...
>>>
>>> Presidential elections are all about facade.
>>> If Romney pulls way ahead in the polls, then in
>>> the next debate he will be the one stammering and
>>> looking at his shoes all evening. The whole thing
>>> is choreographed to keep moron pro wrestling
>>> fans mesmerized and coming back for more.
>>
>> Id have to disagree. But then..Ive been watching such debates since
>> the mid 1950s
>
> No, you haven't.
>
> https://www.facebook.com/GunnerAsch/info
>
> You were born November 11, 1953. You weren't watching any debates in the
> mid 1950s. You weren't even watching them in the mid 1960s. In the fall
> of 1960, you were not quite seven years old. You didn't watch the
> Kennedy-Nixon debates.
>
james g. keegan jr.
Oct 4, 2012, 7:11:47 PM10/4/12
to
the mid 1950s, not even in the mid 1960s.
George Plimpton
Oct 4, 2012, 7:12:26 PM10/4/12
to
obadia...@gmail.com
Oct 4, 2012, 7:22:03 PM10/4/12
to
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 9:24:03 AM UTC-8, jim wrote:
> > Your façade is shattered, jimmie. We know you're just an angry extremist partisan.
>Sounds like you really are a die hard pro wrestling fan.
And an angry extremist partisan.
Curt
> > Your façade is shattered, jimmie. We know you're just an angry extremist partisan.
>Sounds like you really are a die hard pro wrestling fan.
And an angry extremist partisan.
Curt
SaPeIsMa
Oct 4, 2012, 9:33:39 PM10/4/12
to
"Gunner" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ntr68516ifrhdpk7...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:28:11 -0500, jim <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m...@mwt.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>no hope or change wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/4/2012 10:12 AM, jim wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > no hope or change wrote:
>>> >>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>no hope or change wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/4/2012 10:12 AM, jim wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > no hope or change wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> On 10/4/2012 9:29 AM, jim wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> George Plimpton wrote:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
>>> >>>>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
>>> >>>>> wiped the floor with his ass.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> You're an idiot.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>>> >>
>>> >> Haters of democracy are so pathetic.
>>> >
>>> > You call a sham like pro wrestling a democracy?
>>>
>>> You dare to compare pro wrestling to the American democracy?
>>
>>I guess I struck a nerve.
>
> Or stepped on your dick.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
>>> >>>>> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
>>> >>>>> wiped the floor with his ass.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> You're an idiot.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Pro wrestling fans are so sensitive
>>> >>
>>> >> Haters of democracy are so pathetic.
>>> >
>>> > You call a sham like pro wrestling a democracy?
>>>
>>> You dare to compare pro wrestling to the American democracy?
>>
>>I guess I struck a nerve.
>
>
> The jury is still out on that one.
>
Highly doubtful that he has anything long enough to step on
EVEN if he contorted himself like an acrobat from Cirque du Soleil.
Gunner
Oct 4, 2012, 9:33:50 PM10/4/12
to
Mom and Dad were Democrat ward heelers and were rather "up there" in
the Democratic Party. Staff as it were.
Which is why I got to march with Dr King in Detroit in June of
1963..at the age of almost..10.
It was a very interesting time.
Now my parents (and I) became Republicans in the later 1960s and they
became "up there" in the RNC for many years.
Seems as though they became disillusioned with the Democratic Party
with LBJ killing so many American boys in Vietnam. Which is why I
didnt tell them that I joined the Army and volunteered for Vietnam.
Both tours. At the real age of 17, with a birth cert that said I was
almost 20.
Now that being said..I lost a bet, a bit over a year ago..and as
terms of the bet..I had to register as a Democrat for a year.
Which I did. And Ive not reregistered as a Republican because I get
all this really cool mail from the DNC asking for $3 donations and
telling me Michelle Obama loves me and so on and so forth. Just think
of me as a 5th columnist.. I forward on all the really trashy stuff
from the DNC to a very large group of people and we all have a really
good laugh.
I actually sent the DNC a $3 donation. A good money order.
Laminated very properly......, to a nice red brick.
And I didnt put any postage on it.
So the DNC had to pay the postage..on a brick. Ill bet that was a
money making proposition for them wasnt it?
So yep..Im a Democrat. And as should be known..Im not white.
So perhaps you wish to rethink whatever buffoonery you are about to
cough up?
Hummm?
<VBG>
Gunner
Oct 4, 2012, 9:34:31 PM10/4/12
to
>>>>
>>>> Somebody should tear down the facade...
>>>>
>>>> Presidential elections are all about facade.
>>>> If Romney pulls way ahead in the polls, then in
>>>> the next debate he will be the one stammering and
>>>> looking at his shoes all evening. The whole thing
>>>> is choreographed to keep moron pro wrestling
>>>> fans mesmerized and coming back for more.
>>>
>>> Id have to disagree. But then..Ive been watching such debates since
>>> the mid 1950s
>>
>> No, you haven't.
>>
>> https://www.facebook.com/GunnerAsch/info
>>
>> You were born November 11, 1953. You weren't watching any debates in the
>> mid 1950s. You weren't even watching them in the mid 1960s. In the fall
>> of 1960, you were not quite seven years old. You didn't watch the
>> Kennedy-Nixon debates.
>>
>They're on youtube you know..
Indeed they are. All of them.
>>>> Somebody should tear down the facade...
>>>>
>>>> Presidential elections are all about facade.
>>>> If Romney pulls way ahead in the polls, then in
>>>> the next debate he will be the one stammering and
>>>> looking at his shoes all evening. The whole thing
>>>> is choreographed to keep moron pro wrestling
>>>> fans mesmerized and coming back for more.
>>>
>>> Id have to disagree. But then..Ive been watching such debates since
>>> the mid 1950s
>>
>> No, you haven't.
>>
>> https://www.facebook.com/GunnerAsch/info
>>
>> You were born November 11, 1953. You weren't watching any debates in the
>> mid 1950s. You weren't even watching them in the mid 1960s. In the fall
>> of 1960, you were not quite seven years old. You didn't watch the
>> Kennedy-Nixon debates.
>>
>They're on youtube you know..
Gunner
Oct 4, 2012, 9:35:54 PM10/4/12
to
<VBG>
Gunner
Oct 4, 2012, 9:36:44 PM10/4/12
to
With mental issues of course.
obadia...@gmail.com
Oct 4, 2012, 11:15:00 PM10/4/12
to gunner...@gmail.com
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 5:34:25 PM UTC-8, Gunner wrote:
>>You didn't watch the >Kennedy-Nixon debates.
>Actually...I really did. Mom and Dad were Democrat ward heelers and were rather "up there" in the Democratic Party. Staff as it were. Which is why I got to march with Dr King in Detroit in June of 1963..at the age of almost..10. It was a very interesting time. Now my parents (and I) became Republicans in the later 1960s and they became "up there" in the RNC for many years. Seems as though they became disillusioned with the Democratic Party with LBJ killing so many American boys in Vietnam. Which is why I didnt tell them that I joined the Army and volunteered for Vietnam. Both tours.
You, sir, are utterly lying.
>>You didn't watch the >Kennedy-Nixon debates.
>Actually...I really did. Mom and Dad were Democrat ward heelers and were rather "up there" in the Democratic Party. Staff as it were. Which is why I got to march with Dr King in Detroit in June of 1963..at the age of almost..10. It was a very interesting time. Now my parents (and I) became Republicans in the later 1960s and they became "up there" in the RNC for many years. Seems as though they became disillusioned with the Democratic Party with LBJ killing so many American boys in Vietnam. Which is why I didnt tell them that I joined the Army and volunteered for Vietnam. Both tours.
Curt
Message has been deleted
no hope or change
Oct 5, 2012, 12:27:48 AM10/5/12
to
On 10/4/2012 5:22 PM, obadia...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, October 4, 2012 9:24:03 AM UTC-8, jim wrote:
>
>>> Your fa�ade is shattered, jimmie. We know you're just an angry extremist partisan.
> On Thursday, October 4, 2012 9:24:03 AM UTC-8, jim wrote:
>
>
>> Sounds like you really are a die hard pro wrestling fan.
>
> And an angry extremist partisan.
>
> Curt
Decent self-indictment.
>> Sounds like you really are a die hard pro wrestling fan.
>
> And an angry extremist partisan.
>
> Curt
Too_Many_Tools
Oct 5, 2012, 12:27:40 AM10/5/12
to
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
Oct 5, 2012, 12:30:46 AM10/5/12
to
On Oct 4, 8:37 pm, Gunner <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:59:23 -0600, no hope or change
>
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:59:23 -0600, no hope or change
>
TMT
no hope or change
Oct 5, 2012, 12:31:46 AM10/5/12
to
>>>>>
>>>>> Somebody should tear down the facade...
>>>>>
>>>>> Presidential elections are all about facade.
>>>>> If Romney pulls way ahead in the polls, then in
>>>>> the next debate he will be the one stammering and
>>>>> looking at his shoes all evening. The whole thing
>>>>> is choreographed to keep moron pro wrestling
>>>>> fans mesmerized and coming back for more.
>>>>
>>>> Id have to disagree. But then..Ive been watching such debates since
>>>> the mid 1950s
>>>
>>> No, you haven't.
>>>
>>> https://www.facebook.com/GunnerAsch/info
>>>
>>> You were born November 11, 1953. You weren't watching any debates in the
>>> mid 1950s. You weren't even watching them in the mid 1960s. In the fall
>>> of 1960, you were not quite seven years old. You didn't watch the
>>> Kennedy-Nixon debates.
>>>
>> They're on youtube you know..
>
> Indeed they are. All of them.
>
> <VBG>
>
LOL!
>>>>> Somebody should tear down the facade...
>>>>>
>>>>> Presidential elections are all about facade.
>>>>> If Romney pulls way ahead in the polls, then in
>>>>> the next debate he will be the one stammering and
>>>>> looking at his shoes all evening. The whole thing
>>>>> is choreographed to keep moron pro wrestling
>>>>> fans mesmerized and coming back for more.
>>>>
>>>> Id have to disagree. But then..Ive been watching such debates since
>>>> the mid 1950s
>>>
>>> No, you haven't.
>>>
>>> https://www.facebook.com/GunnerAsch/info
>>>
>>> You were born November 11, 1953. You weren't watching any debates in the
>>> mid 1950s. You weren't even watching them in the mid 1960s. In the fall
>>> of 1960, you were not quite seven years old. You didn't watch the
>>> Kennedy-Nixon debates.
>>>
>> They're on youtube you know..
>
> Indeed they are. All of them.
>
> <VBG>
>
no hope or change
Oct 5, 2012, 12:32:20 AM10/5/12
to
On 10/4/2012 7:36 PM, Gunner wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:59:23 -0600, no hope or change
> <o's...@dead.economy> wrote:
>
>> On 10/4/2012 3:50 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>> So says Mark "Liar of the Day" Wieber....who is 58 years old.
>>
>> How old are you, fuckwit?
>
> Im voting for a very precocious 17.
>
> With mental issues of course.
>
> Gunner
Nah, 17 going on senile. trust me...
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:59:23 -0600, no hope or change
> <o's...@dead.economy> wrote:
>
>> On 10/4/2012 3:50 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>> So says Mark "Liar of the Day" Wieber....who is 58 years old.
>>
>> How old are you, fuckwit?
>
> Im voting for a very precocious 17.
>
> With mental issues of course.
>
> Gunner
no hope or change
Oct 5, 2012, 12:36:44 AM10/5/12
to
You are a lie made to human form.
no hope or change
Oct 5, 2012, 12:40:17 AM10/5/12
to
no hope or change
Oct 5, 2012, 12:41:28 AM10/5/12
to
On 10/4/2012 10:27 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> poor little Mark Wieber...changing nyms to hide his gay side.
You need a real boyfriend, one with no wife.
> poor little Mark Wieber...changing nyms to hide his gay side.
You sick fag dope.
Message has been deleted
no hope or change
Oct 5, 2012, 12:46:09 AM10/5/12
to
On 10/4/2012 10:41 PM, Deucalion wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 22:31:46 -0600, no hope or change
>>>>>>>> All you did was tear down the façade, jimmie.
> them?
Are you drugged up tonight?
I've seen you almost lucid a few times...
This is not one of them.
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 22:31:46 -0600, no hope or change
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Somebody should tear down the facade...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Presidential elections are all about facade.
>>>>>>> If Romney pulls way ahead in the polls, then in
>>>>>>> the next debate he will be the one stammering and
>>>>>>> looking at his shoes all evening. The whole thing
>>>>>>> is choreographed to keep moron pro wrestling
>>>>>>> fans mesmerized and coming back for more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Id have to disagree. But then..Ive been watching such debates since
>>>>>> the mid 1950s
>>>>>
>>>>> No, you haven't.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/GunnerAsch/info
>>>>>
>>>>> You were born November 11, 1953. You weren't watching any debates in the
>>>>> mid 1950s. You weren't even watching them in the mid 1960s. In the fall
>>>>> of 1960, you were not quite seven years old. You didn't watch the
>>>>> Kennedy-Nixon debates.
>>>>>
>>>> They're on youtube you know..
>>>
>>> Indeed they are. All of them.
>>>
>>> <VBG>
>>>
>>
>> LOL!
>
> Where they on youtube back in the mid 1950's when he was watching
>>>>>>> Somebody should tear down the facade...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Presidential elections are all about facade.
>>>>>>> If Romney pulls way ahead in the polls, then in
>>>>>>> the next debate he will be the one stammering and
>>>>>>> looking at his shoes all evening. The whole thing
>>>>>>> is choreographed to keep moron pro wrestling
>>>>>>> fans mesmerized and coming back for more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Id have to disagree. But then..Ive been watching such debates since
>>>>>> the mid 1950s
>>>>>
>>>>> No, you haven't.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/GunnerAsch/info
>>>>>
>>>>> You were born November 11, 1953. You weren't watching any debates in the
>>>>> mid 1950s. You weren't even watching them in the mid 1960s. In the fall
>>>>> of 1960, you were not quite seven years old. You didn't watch the
>>>>> Kennedy-Nixon debates.
>>>>>
>>>> They're on youtube you know..
>>>
>>> Indeed they are. All of them.
>>>
>>> <VBG>
>>>
>>
>> LOL!
>
> them?
Are you drugged up tonight?
I've seen you almost lucid a few times...
This is not one of them.
pyotr filipivich
Oct 5, 2012, 1:59:29 AM10/5/12
to
Gunner <gunne...@gmail.com> on Thu, 04 Oct 2012 18:36:44 -0700 typed
in misc.survivalism the following:
believing it.
I think he is the personification of what the "underground comics"
[think R. Crumb] used to depict as the latest incarnation of the
"boobouise" - getting the "straight doped" pumped into them through
their TVs.
--
pyotr filipivich
Most journalists these days couldn't investigate a missing chocolate cake
at a pre-school without a Democrat office holder telling them what to look for,
where, and why it is Geroge Bush's fault.
in misc.survivalism the following:
>On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:59:23 -0600, no hope or change
><o's...@dead.economy> wrote:
>
>>On 10/4/2012 3:50 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>> So says Mark "Liar of the Day" Wieber....who is 58 years old.
>>
>>How old are you, fuckwit?
>
>Im voting for a very precocious 17.
37 more like it. the last 30 years sucking at the glass teat, and
><o's...@dead.economy> wrote:
>
>>On 10/4/2012 3:50 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>> So says Mark "Liar of the Day" Wieber....who is 58 years old.
>>
>>How old are you, fuckwit?
>
>Im voting for a very precocious 17.
believing it.
I think he is the personification of what the "underground comics"
[think R. Crumb] used to depict as the latest incarnation of the
"boobouise" - getting the "straight doped" pumped into them through
their TVs.
>
>With mental issues of course.
Case or effect of all that TV watching?
>With mental issues of course.
--
pyotr filipivich
Most journalists these days couldn't investigate a missing chocolate cake
at a pre-school without a Democrat office holder telling them what to look for,
where, and why it is Geroge Bush's fault.
pyotr filipivich
Oct 5, 2012, 1:59:29 AM10/5/12
to
Gunner <gunne...@gmail.com> on Thu, 04 Oct 2012 18:33:50 -0700 typed
in misc.survivalism the following:
>
Shame on you for perpetuating an unfortunate stereotype. But then
... you _are_ a registered Democrat. Sigh.
Is that like being a registered purebred dog?
tschus
pyotr
in misc.survivalism the following:
>
>So the DNC had to pay the postage..on a brick. Ill bet that was a
>money making proposition for them wasnt it?
>
>So yep..Im a Democrat. And as should be known..Im not white.
Yep - Democrat alright.
>money making proposition for them wasnt it?
>
>So yep..Im a Democrat. And as should be known..Im not white.
Shame on you for perpetuating an unfortunate stereotype. But then
... you _are_ a registered Democrat. Sigh.
Is that like being a registered purebred dog?
tschus
pyotr
Gunner
Oct 5, 2012, 2:31:21 AM10/5/12
to
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 22:46:09 -0600, no hope or change
The Deucebag has never been on any level approaching "Lucid" in as
long as Ive seen him on Usenet.
The best one can say about him is that he is predicable. One can lead
him around easily, like a group of kids can lead a poor resident of
the gutter..with a pint of booze.
But he will never..unfortunately..ever reach "lucid"
Shrug
Gunner
The methodology of the left has always been:
1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form oflaw
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie
long as Ive seen him on Usenet.
The best one can say about him is that he is predicable. One can lead
him around easily, like a group of kids can lead a poor resident of
the gutter..with a pint of booze.
But he will never..unfortunately..ever reach "lucid"
Shrug
Gunner
The methodology of the left has always been:
1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form oflaw
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie
Gunner
Oct 5, 2012, 2:32:39 AM10/5/12
to
recently. Perhaps the meds should be changed to something else?
Gunner
Oct 5, 2012, 2:52:16 AM10/5/12
to
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 22:59:29 -0700, pyotr filipivich
<ph...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>Gunner <gunne...@gmail.com> on Thu, 04 Oct 2012 18:33:50 -0700 typed
>in misc.survivalism the following:
>>
>>So the DNC had to pay the postage..on a brick. Ill bet that was a
>>money making proposition for them wasnt
>>
<ph...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>Gunner <gunne...@gmail.com> on Thu, 04 Oct 2012 18:33:50 -0700 typed
>in misc.survivalism the following:
>>
>>So the DNC had to pay the postage..on a brick. Ill bet that was a
>>money making proposition for them wasnt
>>
>>So yep..Im a Democrat. And as should be known..Im not white.
>
> Yep - Democrat alright.
>
> Shame on you for perpetuating an unfortunate stereotype. But then
>... you _are_ a registered Democrat. Sigh.
>
> Is that like being a registered purebred dog?
Actually..Im more of a mutt..and quite proud of it. Purebreds are
>
> Yep - Democrat alright.
>
> Shame on you for perpetuating an unfortunate stereotype. But then
>... you _are_ a registered Democrat. Sigh.
>
> Is that like being a registered purebred dog?
generally brainless, nasty tempered, with little except form to some
standard.
Look at the Kennedys for an example.
>tschus
>pyotr
>
>--
>pyotr filipivich
>Most journalists these days couldn't investigate a missing chocolate cake
>at a pre-school without a Democrat office holder telling them what to look for,
>where, and why it is Geroge Bush's fault.
Cons'rUs
Oct 5, 2012, 3:27:27 AM10/5/12
to
On 04/10/2012 12:05 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>
> Obama looks like an untested state senator from Illinois.
>
>
> Obama looks like an untested state senator from Illinois.
Michael A. Terrell
Oct 5, 2012, 9:13:36 AM10/5/12
to
Gunner wrote:
>
> Evidently he is. His "issues" seem to be in control of him much more
> recently. Perhaps the meds should be changed to something else?
Transition Zone
Oct 5, 2012, 10:20:44 AM10/5/12
to
On Oct 4, 11:53 am, no hope or change <o...@dead.economy> wrote:
> debate.
But not the election, so far.
"Polls: Obama crushing Romney with swing-state Hispanics
The Hill (blog) - 49 minutes ago
"President Obama is crushing Mitt Romney with swing-state Hispanics,
according to two new polls out from nonpartisan pollster Latino
Decisions."
-- http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/260467-polls-obama-crushing-romney-with-swing-state-hispanics
> On 10/4/2012 8:30 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>
> > On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>
> >> George Plimpton wrote:
>
> >>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>
> >> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
> >> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
> >> wiped the floor with his ass.
>
> > You're an idiot.
>
> I like how Libs become cynics on democracy the minute their guy loses a
>
> > On 10/4/2012 4:34 AM, jim wrote:
>
> >> George Plimpton wrote:
>
> >>> "Romney Won First Debate, 67 Percent of Voters Tell CNN"
>
> >> Presidential elections are phonier than Pro Wrestling.
> >> Had Romney been ahead in the polls Obama would have
> >> wiped the floor with his ass.
>
> > You're an idiot.
>
> debate.
But not the election, so far.
"Polls: Obama crushing Romney with swing-state Hispanics
The Hill (blog) - 49 minutes ago
"President Obama is crushing Mitt Romney with swing-state Hispanics,
according to two new polls out from nonpartisan pollster Latino
Decisions."
-- http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/260467-polls-obama-crushing-romney-with-swing-state-hispanics
Message has been deleted
Julaine Schexnayder
Oct 5, 2012, 11:17:40 AM10/5/12
to
debates in the election of 1956. Eisenhower never debated Stevenson.
You're just a goddamned liar.
> Mom and Dad were Democrat ward heelers and were rather "up there" in
> the Democratic Party. Staff as it were.
>
> Which is why I got to march with Dr King in Detroit in June of
> 1963..at the age of almost..10.
about having watched presidential debates in the mid 1950s. You never
did that - you lied.
> Now that being said..I lost a bet, a bit over a year ago..and as
> terms of the bet..I had to register as a Democrat for a year.
> Which I did. And Ive not reregistered as a Republican because I get
> all this really cool mail from the DNC asking for $3 donations and
> telling me Michelle Obama loves me and so on and so forth. Just think
> of me as a 5th columnist.. I forward on all the really trashy stuff
> from the DNC to a very large group of people and we all have a really
> good laugh.
> I actually sent the DNC a $3 donation. A good money order.
> Laminated very properly......, to a nice red brick.
>
> And I didnt put any postage on it.
doing this, but you never did it.
>
> So the DNC had to pay the postage..on a brick. Ill bet that was a
> money making proposition for them wasnt it?
> So yep..Im a Democrat.
No, you're not.
> And as should be known..Im not white.
Julaine Schexnayder
Oct 5, 2012, 11:18:30 AM10/5/12
to
or anywhere else - there weren't any.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages