Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

informit.com

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Jakub Duda

unread,
Mar 30, 2005, 3:33:38 AM3/30/05
to
Hello,

informit.com has serious display problems on b3

Cube

--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

Ken Knox

unread,
Mar 30, 2005, 5:44:00 AM3/30/05
to
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:33:38 -0500, Jakub Duda <ku...@poczta.onet.pl>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> informit.com has serious display problems on b3
>
> Cube
>

Yep...and having a front page of almost 1M isn't too smart either! :-)

--
Ken
Choose Opera!
Fast, Secure, Simply the Best Internet Experience
http://www.opera.com

Nisse Engström

unread,
Mar 30, 2005, 9:06:30 AM3/30/05
to
Ken Knox<nob...@nowhere.gov> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:33:38 -0500, Jakub Duda <ku...@poczta.onet.pl>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > informit.com has serious display problems on b3

It looks like Opera isn't applying any style rules
for descendants of #helloObject. Dunno why.

>
> Yep...and having a front page of almost 1M isn't too smart either! :-)

Ooooh, clever! They've got a 1000x750 pixel 24-bit image,
shrunk to 72x51. Saves them the trouble to create a thumbnail. :-)


--n

Nisse Engström

unread,
Apr 3, 2005, 10:46:12 AM4/3/05
to
Nisse Engström<Pvovot...@tele2.se> wrote:
> Ken Knox<nob...@nowhere.gov> wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:33:38 -0500, Jakub Duda <ku...@poczta.onet.pl>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > informit.com has serious display problems on b3
>
> It looks like Opera isn't applying any style rules
> for descendants of #helloObject. Dunno why.

Don't laugh now...

The error is on line 1, character 151:

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org.1999/xhtml">

The page works as intended, if this is corrected to:

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

A simple validation should have pointed this out. I'll
leave it to others to work out whether this is a bug.
In the meantime...

<slap target="forehead">

> > Yep...and having a front page of almost 1M isn't too smart either! :-)
>
> Ooooh, clever! They've got a 1000x750 pixel 24-bit image,
> shrunk to 72x51. Saves them the trouble to create a thumbnail. :-)

[I didn't mean to imply that the authors were clueless.
Quite the contrary. From my cursory examination of the code,
they certainly seem to know what they're doing, at least when
it comes to (X)HTML and CSS. In all likelyhood, they linked to
the wrong image by mistake, or plain forgot to make a thumbnail.
I would have mentioned this in my previous article, if I hadn't
been in a hurry when I wrote it. Sorry about that.]


--n

0 new messages