ruote Google Group

Re: [ruote:1973] ruote 2.1.1 released

kenneth.kal...@gmail.com (Kenneth Kalmer) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:37:46 UT

Congratulations ! Looking forward to seeing the potential being unleashed by
the new engine :)
I've updated ruote-kit to use 2.1.3 (the 'ruote-kit' branch of my ruote
fork). These updates are not compatible with previous ruote-kit releases
since the whole engine's underpinnings have changed.
Upgrade instructions:

Re: [ruote:1973] ruote 2.1.1 released

jmettr...@openwfe.org (John Mettraux) — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:10:43 UT

Hello Matt,
I merged your commit about that issue, many thanks !
[link]
[link]
Nice catch and thanks a lot for the test, it's in.
[link]

ruote 2.1.1 released

jmettr...@openwfe.org (John Mettraux) — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:34:15 UT

Hi,
I've just released ruote 2.1.1
[link]
[link]
Many thanks to you all for your support during 2009. I wish you a
happy new year 2010 !

Re: [ruote:1971] Route 2.0 File Listener?

jmettr...@openwfe.org (John Mettraux) — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:36:36 UT

Hello Greg,
no worries. I haven't yet ported FileListener to ruote 2.0.
I'm currently working on ruote 2.1 (will be out soon) and I just
renamed the "listener" concept to "receiver" to prevent confusion
between the "listen" expression and listeners.
If you really need a ruote 2.0 FileListener, you should be able to

Route 2.0 File Listener?

g...@eyetools.com (greg@eyetools.com) — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:02:56 UT

I can't find an example of how to use a File Listener in Route 2.0.
Help? (I've looked over and over, so please forgive me if I missed
something obvious)

Re: [ruote:1969] rk on Win32

jmettr...@openwfe.org (John Mettraux) — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:57:58 UT

Hello Alex,
this NoMethodError is the symptom of a bug, sorry. I filled a bug report :
[link]
Ruote should be able to produce a status info even in case of broken process.
What does "no chance to kill it" mean ?
Isn't the process simply terminated ? That is regular behaviour.

rk on Win32

alexei.kozhush...@gmail.com (alex ko) — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:06:07 UT

Hi Ruote people!
Followind #ruote discussions with John and Kenneth numerous
experiments with 1.8.6, 1.8.7 and 1,9.1 both mswin32 and mingw32 I
slowly came to following:
Given C:\>ruby -v
ruby 1.8.7 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 72) [i386-mswin32]
I patched bundler [link]

Re: [ruote:1967] IronRuby

jmettr...@openwfe.org (John Mettraux) — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:39:23 UT

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:30 PM, sjampster
Hello,
I have no idea, but the surest way to know is to run the test suite
with IronRuby.
ruby test/test.rb
Best regards,

IronRuby

incrediblesuperd...@gmail.com (sjampster) — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:30:21 UT

Hi,
Does anyone have any experience with running Ruote under IronRuby? I'm
thinking about using IronRuby in my .Net environment, but I know
Ironruby is not 100% according rubyspec. Will this affect ruote very
much?
Thanks for the answer.
Kind regards,
Gerben Heinen

Re: [ruote:1965] ruote-kit updates

jmettr...@openwfe.org (John Mettraux) — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:24:56 UT

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Kenneth Kalmer
Kudos to you guys !

ruote-kit updates

kenneth.kal...@gmail.com (Kenneth Kalmer) — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:23:11 UT

Good day all
Just some updates on ruote-kit & ruote-kit-client for your perusal.
I added a Gemfile to ruote-kit, for use with bundler [1], to simplify the
dependencies required by the project. This might not go down well with
everyone, but from personal experience the 'vendor everything' approach
really works well to eliminate surprises with incompatible gem versions.

Re: [ruote:1963] Regression in commit 50684702dafc9931bc2f79fe35f02b03c23ab4a6: symbol v. string in xml process definitions

jmettr...@openwfe.org (John Mettraux) — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:59:29 UT

Hi Chris,
as said on #ruote, I pushed a fix for this issue. I updated the test
suite of ruote2.1 as well.
[link]
Thanks for the issue report, best regards,

Regression in commit 50684702dafc9931bc2f79fe35f02b03c23ab4a6: symbol v. string in xml process definitions

chris_b...@wgbh.org (Chris Beer) — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:42:21 UT

Hi,

Earlier today, John push a patch to fix a problem with symbols +
string field references in xml process definitions (where <concurrent-
iterator on-field="assets" [...]> wouldn't work on a field
named :assets). Unfortunately, in fixing that, it looks like it broke
the <equals> field references (that already had the logic?).

Re: Ruote and Statemachine combination

incrediblesuperd...@gmail.com (sjampster) — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:55:32 UT

Could discussion, guys. This helps a lot.
Regards,
Gerben

Re: Ruote and Statemachine combination

enri...@gmail.com (Enrico Bianco) — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:10:58 UT

I should also add that in contrast to Kenneth's example, I'm actually
using one large process instead of many small ones. The state machine
doesn't cause any processes to be launched; instead, the process is
launched and then queries the underlying state machine to figure out
what it is supposed to be doing and fires off events within the state