Message from discussion E3033 in 1.9 - looks like a bug ?
Received: by 10.68.129.169 with SMTP id nx9mr5579394pbb.8.1326125617479;
Mon, 09 Jan 2012 08:13:37 -0800 (PST)
From: user1 <us...@example.net>
Subject: Re: E3033 in 1.9 - looks like a bug ?
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:13:38 -0500
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <1906712.1847.1326054401623.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbtv37> <email@example.com>
X-Trace: www.openwatcom.org 1326125616 10795 188.8.131.52 (9 Jan 2012 16:13:36 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:13:36 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0.1) Gecko/20111121 Firefox/8.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.5
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120109-0, 01/09/2012), Outbound message
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
oops - sorry - that is a modified 1.9 version ...
> At the link below there is a version 1.8 wfl386.exe that I modified with
> a hex editor.
> vijayasrivast...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Thanks all for this thread. I have been having issues compliing my
>> programs with 1.9 using the published version of wfl386.exe which
>> consequently is now impacting my research activities.
>> I have tried to downloaded the latest build from the two links
>> provided in this thread:
>> ... and am not able to download as both servers appear to be down.
>> If anyone could please send me the latest fixed release of the
>> wfl386.exe file (I believe it is the July 2011 version) ... I would
>> very much appreciate it.
>> Thanks in advance.