social interactions using spatial analysis

49 views
Skip to first unread message

Julia Koschinsky

unread,
Feb 9, 2012, 10:59:16 AM2/9/12
to openspa...@googlegroups.com, alison....@abdn.ac.uk
on behalf of Alison Pridmore (alison....@abdn.ac.uk).
Julia



Hello,

I am interested in examining social interactions using spatial analysis. However, I am relative newcomer to this field.  My current understanding is that if a spatial lag model provides a better fit than a spatial error model this is indicative of interaction*.  I also understand that there is a suggested specification search procedure whereby the significance of the LM test statistic provides a strong indication of whether spatial lag or spatial error is the proper alternative.  My query is that my dataset has high levels of heteroskesdasticity.  I have used GeodaSpace to correct for this, running the spatial lag and error models and it appears that the
latter is a better fit.  I just want to check whether this is a sensible approach given my interest in social interactions.  I am also wondering if I should also try an alternative approach - correcting the data for heteroskedasticity and then run it in a Geoda regression? (using the specification approach).  If so, advice on how best to correct for heteroskedasticity in this context would be appreciated.    I have a macro for HCSE (Hayes and Cai, 2007) installed on SPSS but as far as I am aware the outputs are not appropriate to use in a Geoda regression........

Many, many thanks

Alison

*Note I am aware of Moran's I and LISA, and the dataset suggests spatial autocorrelation.  I am now accounting for the impact of co- variables.



The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013683.



--
************************
Julia Koschinsky, Ph.D.
Research Director
Assistant Research Professor
Arizona State University
School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning
GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation
julia.ko...@asu.edu

http://geodacenter.asu.edu
http://www.facebook.com/geodacenter
http://twitter.com/GeoDaCenter

Pedro Amaral

unread,
Feb 10, 2012, 10:45:13 AM2/10/12
to openspa...@googlegroups.com, alison....@abdn.ac.uk
Dear Alison,

I'd recommend you to check GeoDa Space. The alpha release can be found here: http://geodacenter.asu.edu/geodaspace_alpha . The software provides LM/robust LM tests to help you to decide between error / lag models, HAC/White corrections for heteroskedasticity, along with the estimator proposed by Arraiz et al (2010) to model heteroskedasticity. In sum, you should be able to take care of everything using just that software.

I hope it helps,

Pedro.

---
Pedro Amaral
PhD Candidate in Land Economy - University of Cambridge
Visiting Student - GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Openspace List" group.
To post to this group, send email to openspa...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to openspace-lis...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openspace-list?hl=en.

Frank Howell

unread,
Feb 10, 2012, 11:27:58 AM2/10/12
to openspa...@googlegroups.com, alison....@abdn.ac.uk
Alison,

You might also read Stewart Fotheringham's work on spatial interaction models....especially on handling origin vs destination characteristics, etc.

Good luck and let us hear about your progress!

Frank

rhos...@u.washington.edu

unread,
Feb 10, 2012, 2:12:52 PM2/10/12
to openspa...@googlegroups.com
The alpha GeoDASpace seems very nice. I managed to get something to run without any documentation which bodes well for the design in my opinion.

Dick Hoskins
UW, Seattle

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012, Frank Howell wrote:

> Alison,
>
> You might also read Stewart Fotheringham's work on spatial interaction models....especially on handling origin
> vs destination characteristics, etc.
>
> Good luck and let us hear about your progress!
>
> Frank
>
> On Feb 10, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Pedro Amaral <pvm...@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Dear Alison,
>
> I'd recommend you to check GeoDa Space. The alpha release can be found here:
> http://geodacenter.asu.edu/geodaspace_alpha . The software provides LM/robust LM tests to help you
> to decide between error / lag models, HAC/White corrections for heteroskedasticity, along with the
> estimator proposed by Arraiz et al (2010) to model heteroskedasticity. In sum, you should be able
> to take care of everything using just that software.
>
> I hope it helps,
>
> Pedro.
>
> ---
> Pedro Amaral
> PhD Candidate in Land Economy - University of Cambridge
> Visiting Student - GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Julia Koschinsky <jkos...@asu.edu> wrote:

> on behalf ofᅵAlison Pridmore (alison....@abdn.ac.uk).


> Julia
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am interested in examining social interactions using spatial analysis. However, I am relative

> newcomer to this field. ᅵMy current understanding is that if a spatial lag model provides a better
> fit than a spatial error model this is indicative of interaction*. ᅵI also understand that there


> is a suggested specification search procedure whereby the significance of the LM test statistic
> provides a strong indication of whether spatial lag or spatial error is the proper alternative.

> ᅵMy query is that my dataset has high levels of heteroskesdasticity. ᅵI have used GeodaSpace to


> correct for this, running the spatial lag and error models and it appears that the

> latter is a better fit. ᅵI just want to check whether this is a sensible approach given my
> interest in social interactions. ᅵI am also wondering if I should also try an alternative approach


> - correcting the data for heteroskedasticity and then run it in a Geoda regression? (using the

> specification approach). ᅵIf so, advice on how best to correct for heteroskedasticity in this
> context would be appreciated. ᅵ ᅵI have a macro for HCSE (Hayes and Cai, 2007) installed on SPSS


> but as far as I am aware the outputs are not appropriate to use in a Geoda regression........
>
> Many, many thanks
>
> Alison
>

> *Note I am aware of Moran's I and LISA, and the dataset suggests spatial autocorrelation. ᅵI am

Julia Koschinsky

unread,
Feb 10, 2012, 2:42:20 PM2/10/12
to openspa...@googlegroups.com
Thanks, Dick. For everyone who is testing GeoDaSpace alpha, please note that we uploaded a new version two days ago with some bug fixes, so we recommend using that version.

Best,
Julia

On 10 February 2012 12:12, <rhos...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
The alpha GeoDASpace seems very nice. I managed to get something to run without any documentation which bodes well for the design in my opinion.

Dick Hoskins
UW, Seattle


On Fri, 10 Feb 2012, Frank Howell wrote:

Alison,

You might also read Stewart Fotheringham's work on spatial interaction models....especially on handling origin
vs destination characteristics, etc.

Good luck and let us hear about your progress!

Frank

On Feb 10, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Pedro Amaral <pvm...@cam.ac.uk> wrote:

     Dear Alison,

     I'd recommend you to check GeoDa Space. The alpha release can be found here:
     http://geodacenter.asu.edu/geodaspace_alpha . The software provides LM/robust LM tests to help you
     to decide between error / lag models, HAC/White corrections for heteroskedasticity, along with the
     estimator proposed by Arraiz et al (2010) to model heteroskedasticity. In sum, you should be able
     to take care of everything using just that software.

     I hope it helps,

     Pedro.

     ---
     Pedro Amaral
     PhD Candidate in Land Economy - University of Cambridge
     Visiting Student - GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation



     On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Julia Koschinsky <jkos...@asu.edu> wrote:
           on behalf of Alison Pridmore (alison....@abdn.ac.uk).

Julia



Hello,

I am interested in examining social interactions using spatial analysis. However, I am relative
newcomer to this field.  My current understanding is that if a spatial lag model provides a better
fit than a spatial error model this is indicative of interaction*.  I also understand that there

is a suggested specification search procedure whereby the significance of the LM test statistic
provides a strong indication of whether spatial lag or spatial error is the proper alternative.
 My query is that my dataset has high levels of heteroskesdasticity.  I have used GeodaSpace to

correct for this, running the spatial lag and error models and it appears that the
latter is a better fit.  I just want to check whether this is a sensible approach given my
interest in social interactions.  I am also wondering if I should also try an alternative approach

- correcting the data for heteroskedasticity and then run it in a Geoda regression? (using the
specification approach).  If so, advice on how best to correct for heteroskedasticity in this
context would be appreciated.    I have a macro for HCSE (Hayes and Cai, 2007) installed on SPSS

but as far as I am aware the outputs are not appropriate to use in a Geoda regression........

Many, many thanks

Alison

*Note I am aware of Moran's I and LISA, and the dataset suggests spatial autocorrelation.  I am

now accounting for the impact of co- variables.



The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013683.



--
************************
Julia Koschinsky, Ph.D.
Research Director
Assistant Research Professor
Arizona State University
School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning
GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation
julia.ko...@asu.edu

http://geodacenter.asu.edu
http://www.facebook.com/geodacenter
http://twitter.com/GeoDaCenter

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Openspace List" group.
To post to this group, send email to openspace-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to openspace-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openspace-list?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Openspace List" group.
To post to this group, send email to openspace-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to openspace-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openspace-list?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Openspace List" group.
To post to this group, send email to openspace-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to openspace-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openspace-list?hl=en.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Openspace List" group.
To post to this group, send email to openspace-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to openspace-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openspace-list?hl=en.




--
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages