Clarifying the "namespace" we use for Activity Streams and Embedded Experiences context

[Ryan Baxter]

I remember some discussion about this and I thought there was an issue for it but I can't remember..

When an embedded experience is place in an activity stream entry or when there is an associated context in the embedded experience data model should the OpenSocial namespace property be

"openSocial" <- this is what the spec shows today

or

"opensocial"

[Matt F.]

I think there was a discussion topic but no issue created that I remember seeing

[Mark W.]

What did we decide? I think just plain "opensocial" would be good.

Given what we've learned, does it make sense to also clarify the "Extensions" section of the spec?

http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/2.0/OpenSocial-Specification.xml#Extensions

[Ryan Baxter]

Mark we decided on "openSocial", at least that is what James has been using in the rewrite.

IDK what happened to the rest of the discussion about this.  I think there is something wrong with the Google group where replies via email are not showing up in the group.  Not sure if anyone else is noticing that...

[Matt F.]

I am definitely seeing missing pieces of conversations and complete topics as well.  A lot of the missing e-mails are from James, but that could just be because he has been the most active.