Now that we're voting on spec issues ( http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pigtmOB55Aw_YJHz040u0Kg&gid=0) for 0.8: I noticed that there was no obvious thread for the RESTFUL-001 item. I thought I'd start one here: the purpose is to incorporate the OpenSocial RESTful API into a requirement for compliance with OpenSocial 0.8. Here's Cassie's summary for RESTFUL-001:
Spec agreed uponLast UpdatedRESTFUL-001 http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dc43mmng_2g6k9qzfb<http://www.google.com/url?q=http://docs.google.com/View%3Fdocid%3Ddc4...> Add support for RESTful urls so that app developers can get data outside of the javascript apis. Having this as part of the 0.8 specification will mean that app developers can rely on basic, common functionality across all containers, even for server to server calls. If this is important to you, please vote +1 on this thread. Thanks!
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:41 PM, John Panzer <jpan...@google.com> wrote: > All,
> Now that we're voting on spec issues > (http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pigtmOB55Aw_YJHz040u0Kg&gid=0) for > 0.8: I noticed that there was no obvious thread for the RESTFUL-001 item. I > thought I'd start one here: the purpose is to incorporate the OpenSocial > RESTful API into a requirement for compliance with OpenSocial 0.8. Here's > Cassie's summary for RESTFUL-001:
> Spec agreed uponLast UpdatedRESTFUL-001 > http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dc43mmng_2g6k9qzfb Add support for RESTful > urls so that app developers can get data outside of the javascript apis. > Having this as part of the 0.8 specification will mean that app developers > can rely on basic, common functionality across all containers, even for > server to server calls. If this is important to you, please vote +1 on this > thread. Thanks!
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Zhen Wang <wa...@google.com> wrote:
> +1! > Can't wait for the RESTful API.
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:41 PM, John Panzer <jpan...@google.com> wrote: > > All,
> > Now that we're voting on spec issues > > (http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pigtmOB55Aw_YJHz040u0Kg&gid=0) > for > > 0.8: I noticed that there was no obvious thread for the RESTFUL-001 item. > I > > thought I'd start one here: the purpose is to incorporate the OpenSocial > > RESTful API into a requirement for compliance with OpenSocial 0.8. > Here's > > Cassie's summary for RESTFUL-001:
> > Spec agreed uponLast UpdatedRESTFUL-001 > > http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dc43mmng_2g6k9qzfb Add support for > RESTful > > urls so that app developers can get data outside of the javascript apis. > > Having this as part of the 0.8 specification will mean that app > developers > > can rely on basic, common functionality across all containers, even for > > server to server calls. If this is important to you, please vote +1 on > this > > thread. Thanks!
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Graham Spencer <g...@google.com> wrote: > +1
> --g
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Zhen Wang <wa...@google.com> wrote:
>> +1! >> Can't wait for the RESTful API.
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:41 PM, John Panzer <jpan...@google.com> wrote: >> > All,
>> > Now that we're voting on spec issues >> > (http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pigtmOB55Aw_YJHz040u0Kg&gid=0) >> for >> > 0.8: I noticed that there was no obvious thread for the RESTFUL-001 >> item. I >> > thought I'd start one here: the purpose is to incorporate the OpenSocial >> > RESTful API into a requirement for compliance with OpenSocial 0.8. >> Here's >> > Cassie's summary for RESTFUL-001:
>> > Spec agreed uponLast UpdatedRESTFUL-001 >> > http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dc43mmng_2g6k9qzfb Add support for >> RESTful >> > urls so that app developers can get data outside of the javascript apis. >> > Having this as part of the 0.8 specification will mean that app >> developers >> > can rely on basic, common functionality across all containers, even for >> > server to server calls. If this is important to you, please vote +1 on >> this >> > thread. Thanks!
> Now that we're voting on spec issues (http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pigtmOB55Aw_YJHz040u0Kg&gid=0) for
> 0.8: I noticed that there was no obvious thread for the RESTFUL-001 item. I
> thought I'd start one here: the purpose is to incorporate the OpenSocial
> RESTful API into a requirement for compliance with OpenSocial 0.8. Here's
> Cassie's summary for RESTFUL-001:
> Spec agreed uponLast UpdatedRESTFUL-001http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dc43mmng_2g6k9qzfb<http://www.google.com/url?q=http://docs.google.com/View%3Fdocid%3Ddc4...>
> Add
> support for RESTful urls so that app developers can get data outside of the
> javascript apis.
> Having this as part of the 0.8 specification will mean that app developers
> can rely on basic, common functionality across all containers, even for
> server to server calls. If this is important to you, please vote +1 on this
> thread. Thanks!
> Now that we're voting on spec issues (http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pigtmOB55Aw_YJHz040u0Kg&gid=0) for
> 0.8: I noticed that there was no obvious thread for the RESTFUL-001 item. I
> thought I'd start one here: the purpose is to incorporate the OpenSocial
> RESTful API into a requirement for compliance with OpenSocial 0.8. Here's
> Cassie's summary for RESTFUL-001:
> Spec agreed uponLast UpdatedRESTFUL-001http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dc43mmng_2g6k9qzfb<http://www.google.com/url?q=http://docs.google.com/View%3Fdocid%3Ddc4...>
> Add
> support for RESTful urls so that app developers can get data outside of the
> javascript apis.
> Having this as part of the 0.8 specification will mean that app developers
> can rely on basic, common functionality across all containers, even for
> server to server calls. If this is important to you, please vote +1 on this
> thread. Thanks!
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:41 PM, John Panzer <jpan...@google.com> wrote: > All,
> Now that we're voting on spec issues ( > http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pigtmOB55Aw_YJHz040u0Kg&gid=0) for > 0.8: I noticed that there was no obvious thread for the RESTFUL-001 item. I > thought I'd start one here: the purpose is to incorporate the OpenSocial > RESTful API into a requirement for compliance with OpenSocial 0.8. Here's > Cassie's summary for RESTFUL-001:
> Spec agreed uponLast UpdatedRESTFUL-001 > http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dc43mmng_2g6k9qzfb<http://www.google.com/url?q=http://docs.google.com/View%3Fdocid%3Ddc4...> Add > support for RESTful urls so that app developers can get data outside of the > javascript apis. > Having this as part of the 0.8 specification will mean that app developers > can rely on basic, common functionality across all containers, even for > server to server calls. If this is important to you, please vote +1 on this > thread. Thanks!
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Graham Spencer <g...@google.com> wrote:
>> +1
>> --g
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Zhen Wang <wa...@google.com> wrote:
>>> +1! >>> Can't wait for the RESTful API.
>>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:41 PM, John Panzer <jpan...@google.com> wrote: >>> > All,
>>> > Now that we're voting on spec issues >>> > (http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pigtmOB55Aw_YJHz040u0Kg&gid=0) >>> for >>> > 0.8: I noticed that there was no obvious thread for the RESTFUL-001 >>> item. I >>> > thought I'd start one here: the purpose is to incorporate the >>> OpenSocial >>> > RESTful API into a requirement for compliance with OpenSocial 0.8. >>> Here's >>> > Cassie's summary for RESTFUL-001:
>>> > Spec agreed uponLast UpdatedRESTFUL-001 >>> > http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dc43mmng_2g6k9qzfb Add support for >>> RESTful >>> > urls so that app developers can get data outside of the javascript >>> apis. >>> > Having this as part of the 0.8 specification will mean that app >>> developers >>> > can rely on basic, common functionality across all containers, even for >>> > server to server calls. If this is important to you, please vote +1 on >>> this >>> > thread. Thanks!
|
