In my copy of the KJV in XML with strongs numbers, I have this kind of
morphological data:
strongMorph:TH8799
for each word. I presume this is the form of the word, but I can't
find any reference to this anywhere. Has anyone seen this kind of
thing before? Is there a dictionary for strongs morphological forms?
I would assume those were a form of the ones in the SWORD KJV module, for the Old Testament. If so, I have heard that it is a proprietary format that we're not allowed to use in open software.
> In my copy of the KJV in XML with strongs numbers, I have this kind of > morphological data:
> strongMorph:TH8799
> for each word. I presume this is the form of the word, but I can't > find any reference to this anywhere. Has anyone seen this kind of > thing before? Is there a dictionary for strongs morphological forms?
Thanks. I had a look, but the morphology only seems to be available
for Greek. There doesn't seem to be any morphological data on hebrew
texts available - well not open source ones anyway.
Any idea how we could add this into the Hebrew Morphology? Where could
we get the data? Have you discussed this elsewhere (I looked but I
couldn't find it).
Thanks again!
On Mar 3, 7:42 pm, Peter von Kaehne <ref...@gmx.net> wrote:
Nothing we do at CrossWire is closed or restricted beyond standard public licenses (by us-- we don't own all the texts we distribute).
Lemma/Morph codes in the Old Testament of the KJV200[36] module were done by the Bible Foundation years and years ago. We only did the NT alignment because the NT lemma/morph codes originally distributed by the Bible Foundation had a copyright claim by another Bible software vendor and we wanted to honor their request to not use their work.
The Bible Foundation used numbers greater than the standard Strong's numbers to represent parsing codes for verbs.
I think someone might have made a module for these codes. Actually, I'm kindof surprised they are still in our module, as I had thought we probably had swapped them out for something else. But I suppose it makes sense since we generally have left the Old Testament alone.
> I would assume those were a form of the ones in the SWORD KJV module, > for the Old Testament. If so, I have heard that it is a proprietary > format that we're not allowed to use in open software.
> David
> On 3/3/2012 3:37 AM, scruffian wrote: >> Hi
>> In my copy of the KJV in XML with strongs numbers, I have this kind of >> morphological data:
>> strongMorph:TH8799
>> for each word. I presume this is the form of the word, but I can't >> find any reference to this anywhere. Has anyone seen this kind of >> thing before? Is there a dictionary for strongs morphological forms?
> Nothing we do at CrossWire is closed or restricted beyond standard
> public licenses (by us-- we don't own all the texts we distribute).
> Lemma/Morph codes in the Old Testament of the KJV200[36] module were
> done by the Bible Foundation years and years ago. We only did the NT
> alignment because the NT lemma/morph codes originally distributed by the
> Bible Foundation had a copyright claim by another Bible software vendor
> and we wanted to honor their request to not use their work.
> The Bible Foundation used numbers greater than the standard Strong's
> numbers to represent parsing codes for verbs.
> I think someone might have made a module for these codes. Actually, I'm
> kindof surprised they are still in our module, as I had thought we
> probably had swapped them out for something else. But I suppose it
> makes sense since we generally have left the Old Testament alone.
> Hope this helps,
> Troy
> On 03/04/2012 02:46 AM, David Troidl wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I would assume those were a form of the ones in the SWORD KJV module,
> > for the Old Testament. If so, I have heard that it is a proprietary
> > format that we're not allowed to use in open software.
> > David
> > On 3/3/2012 3:37 AM, scruffian wrote:
> >> Hi
> >> In my copy of the KJV in XML with strongs numbers, I have this kind of
> >> morphological data:
> >> strongMorph:TH8799
> >> for each word. I presume this is the form of the word, but I can't
> >> find any reference to this anywhere. Has anyone seen this kind of
> >> thing before? Is there a dictionary for strongs morphological forms?
scruffian <scruffy...@gmail.com> wrote: >I couldn't find the data anywhere, but I have been working it out >using a wigrams and this is what I have so far:
>There are probably a few more in there to do. Once I have them all >done I'll put it in a JSON file on git hub...
>On Mar 5, 2:19 am, "Troy A. Griffitts" <scr...@crosswire.org> wrote: >> Nothing we do at CrossWire is closed or restricted beyond standard >> public licenses (by us-- we don't own all the texts we distribute).
>> Lemma/Morph codes in the Old Testament of the KJV200[36] module were >> done by the Bible Foundation years and years ago. We only did the NT >> alignment because the NT lemma/morph codes originally distributed by >the >> Bible Foundation had a copyright claim by another Bible software >vendor >> and we wanted to honor their request to not use their work.
>> The Bible Foundation used numbers greater than the standard Strong's >> numbers to represent parsing codes for verbs.
>> I think someone might have made a module for these codes. Actually, >I'm >> kindof surprised they are still in our module, as I had thought we >> probably had swapped them out for something else. But I suppose it >> makes sense since we generally have left the Old Testament alone.
>> Hope this helps,
>> Troy
>> On 03/04/2012 02:46 AM, David Troidl wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > I would assume those were a form of the ones in the SWORD KJV >module, >> > for the Old Testament. If so, I have heard that it is a proprietary >> > format that we're not allowed to use in open software.
>> > David
>> > On 3/3/2012 3:37 AM, scruffian wrote: >> >> Hi
>> >> In my copy of the KJV in XML with strongs numbers, I have this >kind of >> >> morphological data:
>> >> strongMorph:TH8799
>> >> for each word. I presume this is the form of the word, but I can't >> >> find any reference to this anywhere. Has anyone seen this kind of >> >> thing before? Is there a dictionary for strongs morphological >forms?
>> >> Thanks for your help >> >> Ben
>-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >Groups "Open Scriptures" group. >To post to this group, send email to openscriptures@googlegroups.com. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >openscriptures+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/openscriptures?hl=en.
-- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> There are probably a few more in there to do. Once I have them all > done I'll put it in a JSON file on git hub...
> On Mar 5, 2:19 am, "Troy A. Griffitts" <scr...@crosswire.org> wrote: >> Nothing we do at CrossWire is closed or restricted beyond standard >> public licenses (by us-- we don't own all the texts we distribute).
>> Lemma/Morph codes in the Old Testament of the KJV200[36] module were >> done by the Bible Foundation years and years ago. We only did the NT >> alignment because the NT lemma/morph codes originally distributed by the >> Bible Foundation had a copyright claim by another Bible software vendor >> and we wanted to honor their request to not use their work.
>> The Bible Foundation used numbers greater than the standard Strong's >> numbers to represent parsing codes for verbs.
>> I think someone might have made a module for these codes. Actually, I'm >> kindof surprised they are still in our module, as I had thought we >> probably had swapped them out for something else. But I suppose it >> makes sense since we generally have left the Old Testament alone.
>> Hope this helps,
>> Troy
>> On 03/04/2012 02:46 AM, David Troidl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I would assume those were a form of the ones in the SWORD KJV module, >>> for the Old Testament. If so, I have heard that it is a proprietary >>> format that we're not allowed to use in open software.
>>> David
>>> On 3/3/2012 3:37 AM, scruffian wrote: >>>> Hi
>>>> In my copy of the KJV in XML with strongs numbers, I have this kind of >>>> morphological data:
>>>> strongMorph:TH8799
>>>> for each word. I presume this is the form of the word, but I can't >>>> find any reference to this anywhere. Has anyone seen this kind of >>>> thing before? Is there a dictionary for strongs morphological forms?
>>>> Thanks for your help >>>> Ben
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Scriptures" group. > To post to this group, send email to openscriptures@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to openscriptures+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openscriptures?hl=en.
