Andrew Back
unread,Sep 20, 2012, 3:12:36 AM9/20/12Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to openmanu...@googlegroups.com, kc-fabr...@googlegroups.com, Bryan Bishop, Rob Giseburt
On 20 September 2012 06:06, Jordan Miller <
jrd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't even know if it's legal for them to go closed source now.
> isn't the replicator v1 GPL v3??
If they own all the copyrights I suspect they can do as they please,
e.g. as with licensing changes with new revisions of open source
software and dual (proprietary and open source) licensed software.
It would be interesting to see if there's anything that could be
considered derivative of RepRap, since they don't get to do as they
please with that IP. But I imagine if there were any RepRap IP they
will have been careful to remove it (in hardware this may just just
involve re-drawing something), and even if there were a case against
them they have much deeper pockets now...
Of course, IANAL.
I see a worrying theme in open source hardware: open source until it
doesn't suit me. But ultimately "bait and switch" and "open source
until I send you a take down" strategies are very short-sighted, as
open source software folks have recognised for quite some time.
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Andrew Back
http://carrierdetect.com