Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Communicating with Congress Conference
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Rob Pierson  
View profile  
 More options Sep 17 2007, 1:53 pm
From: "Rob Pierson" <piers...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:53:49 -0400
Local: Mon, Sep 17 2007 1:53 pm
Subject: Communicating with Congress Conference

The Congressional Management  Foundation (CMF) will be holding a conference
in the beginning of October to discuss the problems with, and possible
solutions to, the  current state of constituent communications with
Congress.  The conference will  identify ways to make it easier for
congressional offices to manage and get  value from the communications they
receive and to enable citizens to express  their views to Congress in an
effective way.  Representatives from congressional  offices, House and
Senate institutional offices, citizen and advocacy groups,  academia, and
the technology industry will be working together to find solutions  to the
issue.   For more information on the conference, check out the links at the
end of this email or contact Tim Hysom ( thy...@cmfweb.org) at CMF.

I'll be speaking at the conference, and I was hoping to get some advice from
folks on this list.

I was going to mention the need to funnel constituent input into three
channels. One channel would be constituent communications where someone
actually took the time to write a letter themselves. The second channel
would be for more petition oriented communications ( i.e. 49 people want
Rep. X to sign onto bill Y or support action Z).

I was talking with John the other day about a third channel for constituent
input, tapping into the collective intelligence of the American people.
Something along the lines of Senator Durbin's efforts to develop new
broadband internet policies. (see
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Sen._Dick_Durbin's_nationa...<http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Sen._Dick_Durbin%27s_natio...>for
details)

My inclination is that we're still in an experimental stage of this sort of
collaboration.

Rep. George Miller is experimenting with several fascinating high-tech ways
to interact with constituents (
http://www.communitycounts.us/townhall/miller/), and seeing all of these new
communications methods constantly springing up makes me feel as if we're
still in an early stage of the evolution of technologies to facilitate
online communications between federal representatives and constituents. If
that's the case perhaps we should allow the free market of ideas to continue
innovating and pushing the envelope for a little while longer before the
federal government endorses any specific system? In the meantime, perhaps
elected officials like Sen. Durbin and Rep. Miller should continue engaging
in groundbreaking ventures to help us find the most effective ways to allow
constituents to share their collective wisdom with their representatives in
Congress?

I don't think this "third channel" will be the focus of the conference, but
because of its untapped potential I was considering mentioning it. Any
thoughts on the issue that OH folks had would be greatly appreciated.

For more information on the conference, check out the links below or contact
Tim Hysom (thy...@cmfweb.org) at CMF.

   -  An overview of the Communicating with Congress
Conference<http://www.cmfweb.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=230>
   - A detailed
agenda<http://www.cmfweb.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=231>
   - An overview of CMF's Communicating with Congress
project<http://www.cmfweb.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=62&It...>
   - A brief summary of the current issues with constituent
   communications<http://www.cmfweb.org/storage/cmfweb/documents/CMF_Pubs/cmfspecialrep...>[PDF
-
   69.21 KB]
   - The CMF report Communicating with Congress:  How Capitol Hill is
   Coping with the Surge in Citizen
Advocacy<http://www.cmfweb.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=63&It...>
   - Information about CMF's mission and
work<http://www.cmfweb.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=42&It...>


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Patrice McDermott  
View profile  
 More options Sep 18 2007, 10:14 am
From: Patrice McDermott <patrice...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:14:49 -0700
Local: Tues, Sep 18 2007 10:14 am
Subject: Re: Communicating with Congress Conference
Rob,
Another, really important, channel is the ability of the public to
communicate directly with Members in their capacities as members of
Committees/subcommittees. Several of us keep bringing this up -- and
it keeps being put off. When Reps are on Committees, they do not just
represent their own constituents, they represent the public as a
whole. As currently structured, the House mail systems preclude your
ability to communicate online with a Member unless you are her/his
constituent. I think the ability to communicate directly with Members
in this capacity is among the most important -- as Committees are
where the work of Congress really happens.

So, I would urge you to put the need for this channel at the top of
your list.

Patrice McDermott, Director
OpenTheGovernment.org

On Sep 17, 1:53 pm, "Rob Pierson" <piers...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »