The coverage continues of the Republican House Members on the House floor, more easily trackable now through
dontgo.us.
CRP
just noted
the implementation of the financial disclosure database by the Clerk of
the House, as required by the HLOGA (here's the White House's
press release ). Enhancing public access to disclosure information filed with the Clerk of the House is among the Open House Project's main
reform proposals,
so I'm particularly interested in the requirements' shortfalls and
successes. Vague or poorly requirements can be counterproductive, so
stories of unclear requirements or
similar confusion are relevant to the design of future disclosure requirements and processes. Here's my lobbying disclosure
report.
NextGov covered a recent report on government IT risk management, making points complementary to CTG's
framework for government IT analysis.
Looks like Obama is on
Scribd,
allowing the campaign to post embeddable documents and syndicate. This
is interesting to me as a big fan of embeddable pdfs, (see, for
example, Carl Malamud's GAO docs
scribd group ) though I still prefer the UI
at Issuu.
In the space unoccupied by the e-gov act of 2002, and the work of the
Federal Judicial Center,
a variety of free legal information sites are filling the void left by
official judicial information provision. Here's the relevant section
of the report fro the original e-gov act (H.Rept 107-787). (This is on
my mind because I'm at the
IGOTF conference at Chicago, attending the open legal access working group.)
SEC. 205. FEDERAL COURTS.
(a) Individual Court Websites.--The Chief Justice of the United
States, the chief judge of each circuit and district, and the chief
bankruptcy judge of each district shall establish with respect to the
Supreme Court or the respective court of appeals, district, or
bankruptcy court of a district, a website that contains the following
information or links to websites with the following information:
(1) Location and contact information for the courthouse,
including the telephone numbers and contact names for the
clerk's office and justices' or judges' chambers.
(2) Local rules and standing or general orders of the court.
(3) Individual rules, if in existence, of each justice or
judge in that court.
(4) Access to docket information for each case.
(5) Access to the substance of all written opinions issued by
the court, regardless of whether such opinions are to be
published in the official court reporter, in a text searchable
format.
(6) Access to all documents filed with the courthouse in
electronic form, described under subsection (c).
(7) Any other information (including forms in a format that
can be downloaded) that the court determines useful to the
public.
(b) Maintenance of Data Online.--
(1) Update of information.--The information and rules on each
website shall be updated regularly and kept reasonably current.
(2) Closed cases.--Electronic files and docket information
for cases closed for more than 1 year are not required to be
made available online, except all written opinions with a date
of issuance after the effective date of this section shall
remain available online.
(c) Electronic Filings.--
(1) In general.--Except as provided under paragraph (2), each
court shall make any document that is filed electronically
publicly available online. A court may convert any document
that is filed in paper form to electronic form. To the extent
such conversions are made, all such electronic versions of the
document shall be made available online.
(2) Exceptions.--Documents that are filed that are not
otherwise available to the public, such as documents filed
under seal, shall not be made available online.
(3) Privacy and security concerns.--The Judicial Conference
of the United States may promulgate rules under this subsection
to protect important privacy and security concerns.
(d) Dockets With Links to Documents.--The Judicial Conference of the
United States shall explore the feasibility of technology to post
online dockets with links allowing all filings, decisions, and rulings
in each case to be obtained from the docket sheet of that case.
(e) Cost of Providing Electronic Docketing Information.--Section
303(a) of the Judiciary Appropriations Act, 1992 (28 U.S.C. 1913 note)
is amended in the first sentence by striking ``shall hereafter'' and
inserting ``may, only to the extent necessary,''.
(f) Time Requirements.--Not later than 2 years after the effective
date of this title, the websites under subsection (a) shall be
established, except that access to documents filed in electronic form
shall be established not later than 4 years after that effective date.
(g) Deferral.--
(1) In general.--
(A) Election.--
(i) Notification.--The Chief Justice of the
United States, a chief judge, or chief
bankruptcy judge may submit a notification to
the Administrative Office of the United States
Courts to defer compliance with any requirement
of this section with respect to the Supreme
Court, a court of appeals, district, or the
bankruptcy court of a district.
(ii) Contents.--A notification submitted
under this subparagraph shall state--
(I) the reasons for the deferral; and
(II) the online methods, if any, or
any alternative methods, such court or
district is using to provide greater
public access to information.
(B) Exception.--To the extent that the Supreme Court,
a court of appeals, district, or bankruptcy court of a
district maintains a website under subsection (a), the
Supreme Court or that court of appeals or district
shall comply with subsection (b)(1).
(2) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the effective date
of this title, and every year thereafter, the Judicial
Conference of the United States shall submit a report to the
Committees on Governmental Affairs and the Judiciary of the
Senate and the Committees on Government Reform and the
Judiciary of the House of Representatives that--
(A) contains all notifications submitted to the
Administrative Office of the United States Courts under
this subsection; and
(B) summarizes and evaluates all notifications.