Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Menu of Collaboration Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
John Wonderlich  
View profile  
 More options Mar 12 2008, 12:25 pm
From: "John Wonderlich" <johnwonderl...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:25:01 -0400
Local: Wed, Mar 12 2008 12:25 pm
Subject: Menu of Collaboration Options

I wouldn't be surprised if, over the next few years, governmental and
congressional administrators are approached, or presented with a mandate,
that says: You must initiate a pilot program to incorporate public input
into your (agency's, committee's) Web site.

I expect that administrators and online communications directors will
increasingly be in the position of scrounging around for public
collaboration options.

When they search for ways to benefit from the enthusiastic civilian
volunteer base that exists on the Internet, they should find some meaningful
suggestions.

My question is this:  What are the options available to those looking to
invite public collaboration?

E-rulemaking <http://www.regulations.gov/search/index.jsp> is one good
example, and the best may be the USPTO's Peer to
Patent<http://www.peertopatent.org/>project.

Some broad options would include email lists (like this one), wikis, blogs,
and what else?

Is there a good way to organize our thinking about collaborative projects?

--
John Wonderlich

Program Director
The Sunlight Foundation
(202) 742-1520 ext. 234


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
marci harris  
View profile  
 More options Mar 12 2008, 12:43 pm
From: marci harris <marcid...@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:43:01 -0500
Local: Wed, Mar 12 2008 12:43 pm
Subject: RE: [openhouseproject] Menu of Collaboration Options

John,
I am a congressional staffer and have an idea that has been stewing for a while on this.  Clay Sharky suggested that I talk with someone from Sunlight.  Could I make an appointment to come in and see you?

Thanks,

Marci Harris
202-246-2157

Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:25:01 -0400
From: johnwonderl...@gmail.com
To: openhouseproject@googlegroups.com
Subject: [openhouseproject] Menu of Collaboration Options

I wouldn't be surprised if, over the next few years, governmental and congressional administrators are approached, or presented with a mandate, that says: You must initiate a pilot program to incorporate public input into your (agency's, committee's) Web site.

I expect that administrators and online communications directors will increasingly be in the position of scrounging around for public collaboration options.

When they search for ways to benefit from the enthusiastic civilian volunteer base that exists on the Internet, they should find some meaningful suggestions.

My question is this:  What are the options available to those looking to invite public collaboration?

E-rulemaking is one good example, and the best may be the USPTO's Peer to Patent project.

Some broad options would include email lists (like this one), wikis, blogs, and what else?

Is there a good way to organize our thinking about collaborative projects?
--
John Wonderlich

Program Director
The Sunlight Foundation
(202) 742-1520 ext. 234

_________________________________________________________________
Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging. You IM, we give.
http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
marci harris  
View profile  
 More options Mar 12 2008, 12:44 pm
From: marci harris <marcid...@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:44:09 -0500
Local: Wed, Mar 12 2008 12:44 pm
Subject: RE: [openhouseproject] Menu of Collaboration Options

apologies for emailing the whole list on this!
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:25:01 -0400
From: johnwonderl...@gmail.com
To: openhouseproject@googlegroups.com
Subject: [openhouseproject] Menu of Collaboration Options

I wouldn't be surprised if, over the next few years, governmental and congressional administrators are approached, or presented with a mandate, that says: You must initiate a pilot program to incorporate public input into your (agency's, committee's) Web site.

I expect that administrators and online communications directors will increasingly be in the position of scrounging around for public collaboration options.

When they search for ways to benefit from the enthusiastic civilian volunteer base that exists on the Internet, they should find some meaningful suggestions.

My question is this:  What are the options available to those looking to invite public collaboration?

E-rulemaking is one good example, and the best may be the USPTO's Peer to Patent project.

Some broad options would include email lists (like this one), wikis, blogs, and what else?

Is there a good way to organize our thinking about collaborative projects?
--
John Wonderlich

Program Director
The Sunlight Foundation
(202) 742-1520 ext. 234

_________________________________________________________________
Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging. You IM, we give.
http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
AllThingsReform  
View profile  
 More options Mar 12 2008, 1:19 pm
From: AllThingsReform <poetspi...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 12 2008 1:19 pm
Subject: Re: Menu of Collaboration Options
Yes, perhaps Sunlight's own Earmark Watch, though not in collaboration
with government, is an example of what citizen web tools can do for
government.

Tools can be available on the web for citizens to support government
works.  For example, the wiki Readable Laws at www.readablelaws.org is
dedicated to explaining Congressional legislation in plain English.  I
know that sounds crass, but we hear often of legislators voting on
bills before they fully comprehend them!

And of course, let's not forget that our public servants in government
always want to hear from their constituents, so electronic tools that
facilitate the transfer of text and data between citizens and them is
desirable.  Now, if only our US Senators can file their periodic
campaign finance reports electronically, That would certainly help us
constituents on our end..  :)

David Weller
www.allthingsreform.org

On Mar 12, 11:25 am, "John Wonderlich" <johnwonderl...@gmail.com>
wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »