Received: by 10.227.146.210 with SMTP id i18mr242332wbv.8.1294729148955;
        Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:59:08 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: openarmlab@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.227.184.76 with SMTP id cj12ls5942056wbb.3.p; Mon, 10 Jan 2011
 22:59:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.127.136 with SMTP id g8mr1082603wbs.21.1294729147656;
        Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:59:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.127.136 with SMTP id g8mr1082602wbs.21.1294729147629;
        Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:59:07 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <tux...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wy0-f170.google.com (mail-wy0-f170.google.com [74.125.82.170])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id m15si4669470wbg.1.2011.01.10.22.59.06;
        Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:59:06 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of tux...@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.170;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of tux...@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=tux...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-wy0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 39so27087317wyb.15
        for <openarmlab@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:59:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=2z9enBIfMfFreX0ijLq0IQ6p0z75AO0VKqjz1CHiPgU=;
        b=FRU6lAbHvqPAJTpnPXjuBWRfXPGk3IHaKBE/ArfvpJ0crpzsmpEGTqgGLm4X+6sv1i
         JPOgi+cjeueC82/7F2sga3CnyWSVUOHQTWDsWTmqLe5Oi6mZOpKygkfmWSDVbGbWEZ7Z
         d6uPnJyS4B86BgGMpfcN70DHrdKUmG/CaqJw4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=EfdHSQCeC0l/lHDmudlBUfjSt4w+gVYwb6mANwI9fsp1kdzAIdaALUArfSRhF+BHwz
         220MMg+cCj57ENpSZyCKx7TeOubrw2ZekJoQK2CDeOL+CV5zZB4g9tjcTQ17j1RWuTTv
         7j5sS3zMfLNtrEXBChk9y8lRpufZqZkdzZUSc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.172.212 with SMTP id t62mr27044202wel.60.1294729146445;
 Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:59:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.65.80 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:59:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimmeP9Z-RPxejxcxETPBGuPhGKBuqq6wAihE...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4D2BEF0F.6030...@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimmeP9Z-RPxejxcxETPBGuPhGKBuqq6wAihE...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:29:06 +0530
Message-ID: <AANLkTikKKWqNoBo2gXMJau3Qc7Axep-ENETwc4MNC...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Open ARM Lab would be rechristened to Open Embedded Lab
From: tuxdna <tux...@gmail.com>
To: openarmlab@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

>> For past few days we had a discussion as to why the Name should be Open
>> "Arm" Lab
>> Here are the things that we concluded and decided to rename the community to
>> Open Embedded lab
>>
>
> This is confusing as OpenEmbedded is a separate project
> http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Main_Page
>
How about these names?
1. Wise Device Lab
2. Wise Motifs