Received: by 10.223.123.204 with SMTP id q12mr599314far.26.1294752326999;
        Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:25:26 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: openarmlab@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.223.144.87 with SMTP id y23ls5615235fau.1.p; Tue, 11 Jan 2011
 05:25:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.79.11 with SMTP id n11mr1958726fak.3.1294752325743;
        Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:25:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.79.11 with SMTP id n11mr1958725fak.3.1294752325722;
        Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:25:25 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <mehul.n....@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-fx0-f50.google.com (mail-fx0-f50.google.com [209.85.161.50])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id n17si2644493fam.3.2011.01.11.05.25.24;
        Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:25:24 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mehul.n....@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.50;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mehul.n....@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mehul.n....@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-fx0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 14so19922534fxm.37
        for <openarmlab@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:25:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to
         :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=yys4srxJsdHf/TnVQeRO7KqJUoilzuf0iMmAKlV62Gg=;
        b=En8lHb4Pwk8UrWSpCdxXqXVSf6qNpLLFqTHnKvz8WscXpOb9bLLwo9VKlRQa2vCVUl
         7i4VvwPdePxL2PmF95A+g2beh4uqy+H1WDwY9y9O+g8xtfi4J6l5D7viz66eUbvmoPCs
         jO2tSgX1pPv6ZXEuyRVHxN8vDcJmAWrejNh3k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=VwYF5t8xH+FiTdhJSF8ZfAop2utMJ03cqtsPaK88zaZVY0fMJeSVcIV5cJySiJK/fs
         m76AwKrN6BRkp79wvZAw/sRSNlBBTr7l5jEMttHJOIsU8rtEnkrBBECK+1sgDDJFkGh6
         UI22JPCHj1NePbmYhIhasewFuHgBGGL6jl7zs=
Received: by 10.223.79.13 with SMTP id n13mr3477681fak.48.1294752323301; Tue,
 11 Jan 2011 05:25:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.97.73 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:25:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikLr=X5ReYpBUVn+uidr9ZMLRTmOMjDLejAk...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikKKWqNoBo2gXMJau3Qc7Axep-ENETwc4MNC...@mail.gmail.com>
 <2421396.3259.1294747101485.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbxq13> <AANLkTikLr=X5ReYpBUVn+uidr9ZMLRTmOMjDLejAk...@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mehul Ved <mehul.n....@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:55:03 +0530
Message-ID: <AANLkTinQ=37Q7sP4QnjggxDdwZwz3aeEwcX_mPN9U...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Open ARM Lab would be rechristened to Open Embedded Lab
To: openarmlab@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Amit Karpe <amitka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am with "Open Embedded Lab".

+1

-- 
With Regards,
Mehul Ved