You cannot post messages because only members can post, and you are not currently a member.
Description:
This group is dedicated to discussions around work happening at the Open Web Foundation.
|
|
|
Using OWFa 1.0 for open hardware
|
| |
Wanted to share how we've applied the version 1.0 Open Web Foundation Agreement to a set of hardware specifications. When we were looking at licensing options the OWFa seemed to fit despite being thought of for software. Can find the server specifications on [link] and then we used Creative Commons for the CAD files.... more »
|
|
|
Why use a CLA?
|
| |
John Cowan asked: ...Indeed, I did make that very point, and I'm still not comfortable with CLAs that don't serve a distinct *contribution* purpose. For many software specification projects, there is a long period during which contributions from many people are reviewed and incorporated into a specification document (or software!) followed by a shorter publication... more »
|
|
|
Announcing OWFa and CLA 1.0
|
| |
[apologies in advance for cross-posting] The Board of Directors of the Open Web Foundation <[link]> has unanimously approved the publication of the final version 1.0 of two Contributor License Agreements (CLA) and two Final Specification Agreements (OWFa). The OWFa and CLA are... more »
|
|
|
Article on Open Standards and Open Source
|
| |
I'm attaching a reprint from the latest issue of Software Tech News, published by the US Department of Defense. Some of you may have seen this article before. In it I mention Open Web Foundation, W3C, and Apache Software Foundation, among others, obviously without speaking for any of you. /Larry... more »
|
|
|
Leap2A Under OWFa
|
| |
It looks like this has been out for a few months, but I just noticed that the Leap2A specification has been made available under the OWFa 0.9 by the University of Bolton and Pebble Learning. [link] David
|
|
|
[Open Rosa Meta Data Schema - Version 0.1]
|
| |
Hi, I would like to try to push the work on the OpenRosa API's into accepting a formal specification agreement. Easiest was to first cherry pick the low hanging fruit so lets start with the MetaData schema which according to [0] is 99% complete. This will be used by XForms to communicate with OpenRosa compliant... more »
|
|
|
OWFa in the wild.
|
| |
Hey all, Just found the OWFa in the wild here [0]. Its a cool project, check it out. Nate [0] [link]
|
|
|
