let us be open to other ways of interoperability ..

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Ajit Jaokar

unread,
Oct 20, 2009, 1:57:32 PM10/20/09
to open-web...@googlegroups.com, John Breslin
Greetings!

I observe this thread with interest ..

How shall I put it in one sentence: The open web group should be more
open to new ideas :)

It seems that feedback to John is: Our way is the 'right' way to do
interoperability(OpenID, OpenSocial, OAuth etc etc )

Being the 'open' web group - we should recognise that the semantic web
approach is a valid approach even if it may be different from what
many in this group advocate.

I just wanted to put that point across i.e. it seems that the
'corporate' presence John must incoporporate should be consistent with
what the group believes

That cannot be right :)

For the record, I have spoken at events in Galway and found them great
and as so is the work John's team have been doing over the years

kind rgds
Ajit



2009/10/20 David Recordon <reco...@gmail.com>:
> Hey John,
> I think one of the things that you could do would be expanding your review
> committee to include those in industry who have been deploying technologies
> around social network interoperability.  Facebook, Google, Microsoft,
> MySpace, and Yahoo! all support various interoperability technologies yet
> none of the people or technologies are represented and involved.  While
> semantic web technologies have existed and evolved for a number of years,
> this sort of interoperability for hundreds of millions of people is being
> achieved via Activity Streams, OpenID, OpenSocial, OAuth, and the Portable
> Contacts API.
> --David
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:57 AM, John Breslin <john.b...@nuigalway.ie>
> wrote:
>>
>> > There's a need and a purpose for open-space style events, more
>> > traditional
>> > technology conferences, and academic conferences.  If anything, this
>> > thread
>> > shows that we as a relatively small community have done a poor job
>> > serving
>> > all of these needs.
>>
>> Thanks David - and would like to do what I can to help.
>>
>> > While I hadn't heard about SIOC before, there appear to be over a dozen
>> > implementations according to John's wiki
>> > page:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIOC.
>>
>> There are around about 40-50 applications or modules using SIOC,
>> including Yahoo! SearchMonkey and Drupal 7 (just announced at
>> http://twitter.com/Dries/status/4997311434).  I must update the
>> applications page!
>>
>> All the best, John.
>>
>
>
> >
>

David Recordon

unread,
Oct 20, 2009, 2:54:47 PM10/20/09
to open-web...@googlegroups.com, John Breslin
Hey Ajit,
Please don't take my comments as those of the Open Web Foundation, I actually think that this list is a bit of a funny place to be having this conversation. :)

It's not that I'm not open to new technologies, quite the opposite.  Rather I was trying to help illustrate why there have been so many breakdowns in communication and style over the past 24-hours in this thread.  And yes, it is reasonable to look at which technologies are being deployed given the context of this conference.

--David

Stephan Wenger

unread,
Oct 20, 2009, 3:02:28 PM10/20/09
to open-web...@googlegroups.com, John Breslin
Hi,


On 10/20/09 11:54 AM, "David Recordon" <reco...@gmail.com> wrote:

[...] I actually think that this list is a bit of a funny place to be having this conversation. :) [...]

+1

Stephan

Ajit Jaokar

unread,
Oct 20, 2009, 3:16:01 PM10/20/09
to open-web...@googlegroups.com, John Breslin
:) yes I did have two smileys in there as well .. but I did want to
indicate the point I made .. :)
Many thanks kind rgds Ajit
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages