A RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH A LEGAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Open Web Foundation deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to create an Executive Committee charged with establishing and managing legal policies based on the advice of legal counsel and the interests of the Foundation; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that an Open Web Foundation Executive Committee, to be known as the "Legal Affairs Committee", be and hereby is established pursuant to the Bylaws of the Foundation; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legal Affairs Committee be and hereby is responsible for establishing and managing legal policies based on the advice of legal counsel and the interests of the Foundation; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Legal Affairs Committee:
• Ben Laurie
• David Rudin
• DeWitt Clinton
• Eran Hammer-Lahav
• Gabe Wachob
• Geir Magnusson
• Jim Jagielski
• Lawrence Rosen
• Pelle Braendgaard
• Simon Phipps
• Stephan Wenger
PASSED AND ADOPTED this the 18th day of Setptember, 2008 by the Board of Directors of the Open Web Foundation.
Signed and dated by the President of the Board of Directors of the Open Web Foundation on this the 18th day of September, 2008.
Signature: Brady Brim-DeForest Signature: David Recordon
Name: Brady Brim-DeForest Name: David Recordon
Secretary of the Board President of the Board
CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution regularly presented to and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Open Web Foundation via a roll call mailing-list vote held between the 16th and 18th days of September, at which a quorum was present and voted, and that such resolution is duly recorded in the minute book of this corporation; that the officers named in said resolution have been duly elected or appointed to, and are the present incumbents of the respective offices set after their respective names; and that the signatures set above their respective names are their true and genuine signatures.
Brady Brim-DeForest
Secretary of the Board
You refer to the people listed as the "initial members of the Legal Affairs Committee." Does the Committee have the authority to control its own membership, or does it go back to the Board of Directors to add people?
/Larry
- Robin
--
Robin Cover
WWW: http://xml.coverpages.org
Tel: +1 (972) 296-1783
--David
---
Sent from my iPhone classic.
So if this is intended to be a private party please let the rest of us
know so we can leave quietly.
- Art
You are correct, though they are required to notify the board.
OK.
So, as a member of this mailing list, I propose that OWF committees
(whose first representative should be the Legal Affairs Committee)
control their own membership and may add or remove members according to
a simple majority vote. Any addition or removal should require the
relevant committee to notify the OWF board.
Discussion? Vote?
- johnk
So, as a member of this mailing list, I propose that OWF committees
(whose first representative should be the Legal Affairs Committee)
control their own membership and may add or remove members according to
a simple majority vote. Any addition or removal should require the
relevant committee to notify the OWF board.
Please forgive me, DeWitt, if I touched a nerve.
Actually I was reacting to the somewhat self-satisfied tone I thought
I heard in another writer's response to a question from yet another
member, to wit: "Anyone who wanted to be part of it, is." Which to my
ear didn't sound particularly forward-looking or open or even
responsive to the question.
(Neither, for that matter, did your phrase "I don't see any cause for
concern," which to someone who doesn't know you might suggest you
think your own perceptions are the only ones that matter.)
But I hoped and still hope that I've misread all that, which is why I
made so bold as to share my reaction, even knowing I'd probably
receive some guff for my trouble. In the meantime, I hope you can
summon the empathy to imagine how a newcomer might feel like he had,
indeed, wandered into a private conversation already in process.
Obviously different folks do have different notions of what "openness"
means; if that weren't the case then I'm not sure what work the OWF
would have left to do. So I'm glad you've taken the opportunity to
share with this nascent community what you think on the subject. The
test, of course, will be how you work with folks who may approach
things differently.
- Art