I look forward to seeing what you come up with, I'd never laugh at
someone who is taking the effort to research the topic and taking
pains to develop a rational plan of action based on that research.
When someone does little research, assumes almost instant command of
the topic and then proceeds to repeat the classic errors that have
been debunked for generations....then I tend to laugh.
Your spreadsheet looks about right. When calculating the masses to
design the crank and counterweight, it is vital to know the location
of the centers of gravity. Two equally heavy counterweights respond
very differently depending on how far the center of gravity is from
the axis of rotation.
Counterweights are often strangely shaped, and it's a bit difficult to
determine what their weight and CG will be beforehand. If you have
access to better CAD programs, this information is at your
fingertips. The old timers sometimes got very close with drafting
tools, a knife, scale and construction paper. They would draw out the
counterweight on a piece of construction paper and cut it out very
carefully, then weigh the paper on a precision scale. Then they would
cut out a square from the same material and weigh it. If the paper
square was 5 inches on a side, the area was 25 square inches. If the
weight was 2.5 ounces, then the weight was 0.10 ounces per square
inch. From this point it was easy to determine the area of the
counterweight and by multiplying by thickness obtain volume. The same
heavy paper model was good for finding center of gravity. You would
block a metal rule edge up on the table, lay the paper cutout on it
and move it back and forth til you got it to balance. If the part was
symmetrical, by carefully marking the line described by the rule, you
could find the CG. If not too symmetrical, you would rotate the part
90 degrees on the rule and balance again, the intersection being the
CG. To determine the unbalance force, you then merely had to measure
the distance between the CG and the center of rotation and multiply by
the part weight.
OK, I admit these are kind of crude methods in the computer age, but
perfectly suited for a hacksaw and welder.
Regards,
Ken
On Mar 3, 3:41 am, Dorkmo <
dor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hey ken,
>
> thanks so much for the detailed response. ive been slowly trying to get a
> grasp of it all and what changes i need to do.
>
> ive been putting this off for while but im going to try and figure it all
> out this week
>
> i started a spreadsheet here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgxMMqGvwTM-dEswZUZ6d1hR...