Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!q12g2000prb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greg Carr <gregcarronuse...@lycos.com>
Newsgroups: can.politics,ont.politics,ott.politics,ont.general,can.general
Subject: Re: Has everybody heard that Laureen Harper is gay and the Harper
 marriage is a fraud?
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <c8acece5-63ab-4d3c-b271-d3f96841ff7d@q12g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
References: <c337b0d0-5e3d-46d4-9c73-04d58b16be09@l18g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.6.174.59
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1304230808 21324 127.0.0.1 (1 May 2011 06:20:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 06:20:08 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: q12g2000prb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=207.6.174.59; posting-account=x_wcMAoAAADzr6I5ajzyo0qPNDk9J4nH
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like
 Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.60 Safari/534.24,gzip(gfe)

On Apr 30, 1:36=A0pm, Lefty <leftydr...@netscape.net> wrote:
> Okay, I wasn't going to go here, but the Tories tried to smear Layton,
> then Harper had a disgustingly phony photo op with Laureen watching
> the royal wedding, and my blood boiled, so let us revisit some old
> gossip.
>
> It has long been common knowledge on the Hill and in the civil service
> in Ottawa that the Harpers have separated and Laureen is living with a
> female RCMP officer.

If this is true it is irrelevant to the job that Harper does as PM.
Unlike Layton engaging in illegal activities at a common bawdy house
making him unfit to be PM.

Some sources say the relationship developed when
> the lover was her driver, but that part was not reliably confirmed.
> Laureen agreed to continue to play his wife to help his career. There
> is no word on what her intentions are after the election.
> This is not an unfounded smear. It has been known for some time, was
> confirmed by insider sources and even reported in the Globe and Mail,
> then mysteriously removed.

You are so secure in the truth of this "rumour" that you will repost
it using your real name?
>
> Read about it here;http://backofthebook.ca/2011/01/07/harper-marriag-and-=
globe/4411/
>
> Toronto Life also spilled the story in a blind item here;
>
> http://www.torontolife.com/daily/informer/from-print-edition-informer...