Re: 4 Years Of Coinservative Harper Government Soft On Crime / Soft On Immigration Has Caused The Imminent Collapse Of Canada's Cities
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Canuck57
unread,
Oct 22, 2009, 10:15:05 PM10/22/09
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Nobody wrote: > Conservaties = Niggers wrote: > >> Harper is soft on crime and immigration. His massive debts have >> destroyed Canada.. >> > > Aren't you glad the LIberals aren't running the country? The Liberal > dominated senate delayed and watered down the crime legislation the > Conservatives tried to bring in. They also said Harper wasn't spending > enough.
They just didn't want too many liberals to go to jail.
Canuck57
unread,
Oct 22, 2009, 10:20:01 PM10/22/09
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Nobody wrote: > Conservaties = Niggers wrote: > >> Harper is soft on crime and immigration. His massive debts have >> destroyed Canada.. >> > > Aren't you glad the LIberals aren't running the country? The Liberal > dominated senate delayed and watered down the crime legislation the > Conservatives tried to bring in. They also said Harper wasn't spending > enough.
Best we could hope for, a minority ons government.
When one of these parties finds a leader we can trust, maybe it will change.
Message has been deleted
Canuck57
unread,
Oct 23, 2009, 8:26:12 AM10/23/09
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Nobody wrote:
> I don't see that in the near future.
Neither do I. But they will not get my vote either.