Health Canada's admission the public is not protected from non-thermal effects of wireless

[news....@googlemail.com]

From : "Dennis and Sharon Noble" <dsn...@shaw.ca>

Date : 15 mars 2013 21:57:02 HAE

Attached is the transcript showing James McNamee’s admission thatSafety Code 6 Radiofrequency Exposure Guidelines really considers nonthermal studies only (disregarding cancer and other risks), and, if you can believe, that Health Canada  disregards studies that do not agree with its opinion.

 

See also:

Why is this so important?

For years Health Canada has stated that Safety Code 6 takes into consideration and protects the public from both thermal and non-thermal effects.  They made this statement to groups concerned about Wi-Fi in schools and to those concerned about smart meters and cell towers coming into their neighborhoods.  While they are technically correct in their statement, they mislead the public by what they failed to mention.  What Health Canada failed to mention is that the “non-thermal” effects are considered ONLY for frequencies between 3 and 100 kHz.  For frequencies between 100 kHz and 300 GHz ONLY thermal effects are considered and cell towers fall within this “thermal range.”

That is not the only thing that was novel and refreshing at this hearing.

From André Fauteux