Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Telepresence project
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Travis Smith  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6 2012, 8:01 pm
From: Travis Smith <travi...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 19:01:09 -0600
Local: Tues, Nov 6 2012 8:01 pm
Subject: Re: [OMG] Re: Telepresence project

How about a telescoping, articulating tentacle that mounts to a wall or the
ceiling?  Aliens love that tech (Abyss, War of the Worlds)

Travis

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Travis Smith <travi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we're on the right track, but I'd like to second the idea that
> this thing be attainable/upgradable from a base model.  I'd prefer shitty
> but robust to awesome and always almost ready.

> -Travis

> On Nov 6, 2012, at 12:51, Kevin Fusselman <ke...@fusselman.org> wrote:

> So, sorta like one of those gigapixel cameras in reverse...

> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:50 PM, David Knaack <davidkna...@gmail.com>wrote:

>> I was thinking that the high def wide angle feed would go through a
>> stream filter to crop out the desired section of the image (and maybe
>> transform it to remove the wide angle distortion), providing a software
>> based pan/tilt feature while keeping hardware and bandwidth down.
>>  On Nov 6, 2012 12:40 PM, "Kevin Fusselman" <ke...@fusselman.org> wrote:

>>> Nah, 1080p is fine; we'll compensate for the bandwidth in framerate...
>>> how does 0.2fps sound?  :)

>>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:15 PM, patrick <patrickpecor...@gmail.com>wrote:

>>>> Kevin is worried about bandwidth for high def.

>>>> On Tuesday, November 6, 2012 9:17:24 AM UTC-6, David Knaack wrote:

>>>>> If the camera itself is high def we might be able to get away with
>>>>> using a wide angle view to avoid building a control system for the camera.
>>>>> On Nov 6, 2012 8:57 AM, "patrick" <patrick...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>> I feel it needs the same capability that the MMM has to tilt up and
>>>>>> down. the panning of course would be done by the robot.

>>>>>> On Monday, November 5, 2012 7:41:26 PM UTC-6, Travis Smith wrote:

>>>>>>> OMGers,

>>>>>>> Hey, I'm moving to Japan, its happening.

>>>>>>> Completely due to self interest, I'm suddenly smitten with the idea
>>>>>>> of making a telepresence robot.  The basic plan would be to make one on the
>>>>>>> cheap using skype, a cheap laptop, a roomba, and some mechanism for
>>>>>>> changing the height of the laptop.  Usage would probably need to be limited
>>>>>>> to our members in absentsia, as I would want to enjoy consistent problem
>>>>>>> free use of the device, and random people on the internet lack
>>>>>>> stewardship.  For this right I'm willing to front the cash.

>>>>>>> The point?  While I won't be around, I wanna be around.  OMG and
>>>>>>> hanging out with you guys is pretty much my favorite part about Omaha.

>>>>>>> Patrick votes yes as well (just a guess).  Anyone want to get in on
>>>>>>> this project?  Deadline is February for a working model.  We can go easy
>>>>>>> and work with models already out there, or get creative and make our own
>>>>>>> monstrosity.

>>>>>>> Travis


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.