How does one subscribe to this dicussion board?
Doug Neidermeyer
loss as to how to subscribe to the list.
Is there a daily, weekly or monthly journal of messages available?
If such a journal is available, how does one subscribe?
I can find none of the options available with most mailing lists with
which I am familiar.
Thanks for your assistance.
Douglas Neidermeyer
Administrative Assistant
lawto...@darkstar.cotse.net
Boomerlake
>Having been referred to this discussion board by e-mail, I am at a
>loss as to how to subscribe to the list.
>
>Is there a daily, weekly or monthly journal of messages available?
>
>If such a journal is available, how does one subscribe?
>
>I can find none of the options available with most mailing lists with
>which I am familiar.
>
>Thanks for your assistance.
>
Evidently you're already set up for ok.general or you would not have been able
to make your post.
Steve Henderson
"Doug Neidermeyer" <lawto...@darkstar.cotse.net> wrote in message
news:d7c91157.03112...@posting.google.com...
> Having been referred to this discussion board by e-mail, I am at a
> loss as to how to subscribe to the list.
>
> Is there a daily, weekly or monthly journal of messages available?
>
> If such a journal is available, how does one subscribe?
>
> I can find none of the options available with most mailing lists with
> which I am familiar.
This isn't a mailing list, it's a newsgroup. You have the ability to
download and read all the past messages with your newsreader.
Michael A. Clem
I know it's already been said, but it's always different running
slap-bam into evidence like this: the newsgroups are dying...
;-)
Doug Neidermeyer
I am not familiar with either the term newsgroup or newsreader.
Are they in some way related to on-line news providers such as CNN,
MSNBC and so forth?
I was referred to this discussion board by way of a URL in an
anonymous e-mail addressed to my employer. An e-mail which contained
only a reference to the Google web site and a recommendation that my
employer review an on-going discussion.
Mr. Schoenstein, my supervisor, has tasked me with reviewing these
discussions for those items pertaining to Lawton, Oklahoma.
I am attempting to locate a journal of all such discussions, a
compendium if you will, which may be printed, reviewed and forwarded
to interested parties.
I am completely unfamiliar with the operation of the "Google" web
site.
Is Google the host for the Oklahoma discussion boards?
If so, might I obtain assistance by contacting the operators of the
web site?
Thanks for your kind reply and assistance.
Douglas Neidermeyer
Administrative Assistant
lawto...@darkstar.cotse.net
"Steve Henderson" <etaoin...@cox.net> wrote in message news:<8nawb.22890$gr.8818@okepread04>...
mojopin
"Doug Neidermeyer" <lawto...@darkstar.cotse.net> wrote in message
news:d7c91157.03112...@posting.google.com...
>
> I am not familiar with either the term newsgroup or newsreader.
> Are they in some way related to on-line news providers such as CNN,
> MSNBC and so forth?
>
> I was referred to this discussion board by way of a URL in an
> anonymous e-mail addressed to my employer. An e-mail which contained
> only a reference to the Google web site and a recommendation that my
> employer review an on-going discussion.
>
> Mr. Schoenstein, my supervisor, has tasked me with reviewing these
> discussions for those items pertaining to Lawton, Oklahoma.
>
> I am attempting to locate a journal of all such discussions, a
> compendium if you will, which may be printed, reviewed and forwarded
> to interested parties.
>
> I am completely unfamiliar with the operation of the "Google" web
> site.
>
> Is Google the host for the Oklahoma discussion boards?
>
> If so, might I obtain assistance by contacting the operators of the
> web site?
>
> Thanks for your kind reply and assistance.
>
> Douglas Neidermeyer
> Administrative Assistant
> lawto...@darkstar.cotse.net
>
>
lame
Condor Chef
news:d7c91157.03112...@posting.google.com...
>
> I am not familiar with either the term newsgroup or newsreader.
> Are they in some way related to on-line news providers such as CNN,
> MSNBC and so forth?
>
> I was referred to this discussion board by way of a URL in an
> anonymous e-mail addressed to my employer. An e-mail which contained
> only a reference to the Google web site and a recommendation that my
> employer review an on-going discussion.
>
> Mr. Schoenstein, my supervisor, has tasked me with reviewing these
> discussions for those items pertaining to Lawton, Oklahoma.
>
> I am attempting to locate a journal of all such discussions, a
> compendium if you will, which may be printed, reviewed and forwarded
> to interested parties.
Here y'go:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off
&q=lawton&meta=group%3Dok.general>
and
<http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22Lawton%2C+OK%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=e
n>
and
<http://groups.google.com/groups?num=20&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&s
afe=off&q=%22Lawton%2C+Oklahoma%22>
> I am completely unfamiliar with the operation of the "Google" web
> site.
>
> Is Google the host for the Oklahoma discussion boards?
>
> If so, might I obtain assistance by contacting the operators of the
> web site?
>
> Thanks for your kind reply and assistance.
Go to http://groups.google.com/
Click on "Groups Help"
CC
Ralph Nesbitt
"Doug Neidermeyer" <lawto...@darkstar.cotse.net> wrote in message
news:d7c91157.03112...@posting.google.com...
>
> I am not familiar with either the term newsgroup or newsreader.
> Are they in some way related to on-line news providers such as CNN,
> MSNBC and so forth?
>
> I was referred to this discussion board by way of a URL in an
> anonymous e-mail addressed to my employer. An e-mail which contained
> only a reference to the Google web site and a recommendation that my
> employer review an on-going discussion.
>
> Mr. Schoenstein, my supervisor, has tasked me with reviewing these
> discussions for those items pertaining to Lawton, Oklahoma.
>
> I am attempting to locate a journal of all such discussions, a
> compendium if you will, which may be printed, reviewed and forwarded
> to interested parties.
>
> I am completely unfamiliar with the operation of the "Google" web
> site.
>
> Is Google the host for the Oklahoma discussion boards?
>
> If so, might I obtain assistance by contacting the operators of the
> web site?
>
> Thanks for your kind reply and assistance.
>
> Douglas Neidermeyer
> Administrative Assistant
> lawto...@darkstar.cotse.net
>
the "Powers That Be" for Lawton Schools resulting in the above post.
I will give the ok.general regulars 3 guesses, of which they will probably
only require 1 after putting 2 n 2 together, coming up with 4 as to who
might have done the deed. I have a felling a certain poster to ok.general
just bit, showing themselves for what they are, "a bitter, disgruntled, self
centered, egotistical, individual of ?able moral value, who has nothing else
to do but attempt to stir up trouble IMHO.
Ralph Nesbitt
Wiseguy
Neidermeyer) wrote:
>Having been referred to this discussion board by e-mail, I am at a
>loss as to how to subscribe to the list.
Send $50 to: https://www.paypal.com/affil/pal=wiseg...@yahoo.com
You will be email instructions on how to continue to read and post in
ok.general
mrob...@worldnet.att.net
>Mr. Schoenstein, my supervisor, has tasked me with reviewing these
>discussions for those items pertaining to Lawton, Oklahoma.
Wow... Neidermeyer ended up working for Boon? I guess Boon isn't mad
at him for shutting down Delta. It was 25 years ago, I guess.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077975/quotes
I wonder why Doug is using an anonymous remailer?
Matt Roberds
Michael A. Clem
>Sir,
>
>I am not familiar with either the term newsgroup or newsreader.
>Are they in some way related to on-line news providers such as CNN,
>MSNBC and so forth?
>
>
>
<snip>
>
>Is Google the host for the Oklahoma discussion boards?
>
>If so, might I obtain assistance by contacting the operators of the
>web site?
>
>Thanks for your kind reply and assistance.
>
>Douglas Neidermeyer
>Administrative Assistant
>lawto...@darkstar.cotse.net
>
>
This second post is just too unreal. The only thing Google pulled up
on Doug Neidermeyer was the character in Animal House.
But if it's legit, then what you see is what you get. Google is a good
site that archives and lets you post to the newsgroups, but these
*discussion groups* are independent of any particular website.
Full Moon
Ralph Nesbitt wrote:
Oh yeah Jollytime Popcorn. :-)
Condor Chef
news:3fc3...@news.vigoris.net...
Something didn't smell right - Church of the Swimming Elephant (that's
"Wat chong bye op-nahm" in Thai) account, etc., but I fed him what he was
looking for because:
1. If he's somehow legit, it's good karma, and
2. If he's not - maybe we can "nice" him off to another group.
CC
Condor Chef
news:9e08svg0g6asu9etj...@4ax.com...
> House" references in this group? And there's usually about 3 or 4
> people behind every one of them.
True, but it's hard to troll a group where all the replies are "You're
welcome,
glad I could help." Takes all the fun out of it, wouldn't you think?
CC
Uncle Jerry
<mc...@vigoris.net> wrote:
<snip>
> I know it's already been said, but it's always different running
>slap-bam into evidence like this: the newsgroups are dying...
>
>;-)
Nah, newsgroups are dying.
If one checks the daily volume of data flowing across usenet they will
find it's growing exponentially, on a monthly basis.
Of course most of the 'growth' is the result of pRon, warz, mp3s and
of course SPAM but it is growth.
Uncle Jerry
<I.am.me.as...@the.walrus.com> wrote:
<snip>
> Not likely - think about it, how many times do you see "Animal
>House" references in this group? And there's usually about 3 or 4
>people behind every one of them.
"Animal House" ranks right up there with "Airplane!" among the
greatest heathen comedies of all time.
I definitely gotta', gotta' get "The Double Secret Probation Edition"
on DVD, having worn out several of the VHS tapes of the original
release over the years...
Uncle Jerry
<condo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
>True, but it's hard to troll a group where all the replies are "You're
>welcome,
>glad I could help." Takes all the fun out of it, wouldn't you think?
>
>
>CC
>
Gosh, if it weren't for the virus posters, trolls and Ivan pissin' and
moanin' this group would be practically silent during a 'political
off-season'.
We probably need another round of 'News of the Okies' or something but
I've been too damned busy to update the Okie News Headlines.
So how about some pictures instead?
Maybe some 'Lawn Sprinkler Art' pictures?
Courtesy of the folks at Cox Communications.
They kinda' sorta' left their lawn sprinkler system on as the first
hard freeze of the season arrived in Tulsa.
http://www.bubbaworld.com/sprinkler_art.html
The kids 'skating' to school seemed to think that Cox's Ice Art(tm)
was kinda' cool. The school crossing guard wasn't too happy, as kids
were sliding down the inclined sidewalk ignoring the 'Don't Walk'
sign, but it seemed like they were having fun and no harm was done.
Uncle Jerry
<snip>
>When was the last time you saw the verb "tasked" in a newsgroup? The
>sudden change of tone was interesting.
I don't recall ever having seen the verb "tasked" in a newsgroup.
But...
I also can't recall having seen the phrase "sudden change of tone" in
a newsgroup before either. ;-)
Michael A. Clem
Uncle Jerry wrote:
>On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:40:01 -0600, "Michael A. Clem"
><mc...@vigoris.net> wrote:
>
>
>Nah, newsgroups are dying.
>
>
Speaking of a change of tone, don't you hate it when you post with
errors and typos in your message? I know I do. I really ought to use
the old spell-checker more often, but I don't usually want to take the
time. But even a spell-checker can't catch a word that's spelled
correctly, but just happens to be the wrong word...
;-)
Uncle Jerry
<mc...@vigoris.net> wrote:
>
>
>Uncle Jerry wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:40:01 -0600, "Michael A. Clem"
>><mc...@vigoris.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Nah, newsgroups are dying.
>>
>>
>
> Speaking of a change of tone, don't you hate it when you post with
>errors and typos in your message? I know I do. I really ought to use
>the old spell-checker more often, but I don't usually want to take the
>time. But even a spell-checker can't catch a word that's spelled
>correctly, but just happens to be the wrong word...
>
>;-)
>
What can I say?
I've been so busy of recent that I'm running two days ahead of my
'proof reader' and the Gotcha' Factor(tm) is off the scale...
victoria
This reminds me- in Norway Lillehamer's Olympic Village is still
alive and kicking and in use. Outside the village are two odd, tall,
nearly spire like metal structures that go straight upwards from what
for all purposes appears to be large metal candle holders. These
things have lights of various colours at the base and the spires
appear grated. There are thin filaments of wiring wrapped loosely and
randomly from the 'candle holder' portion to the tip of the spire.
During the Olympics these things had sprays of water coming up and
projecting above the night before the intended display time so that
come time for them to be displayed what you would see would be a
brilliant and sometimes delicately 'laced' natural ice sculpture
underlit in different colours.Since how the sculpture appeared was
completly dependant on temperature and climate each day's design
differed from the last. They sometimes would even 'jet' out the
water-stopping and starting it to get different effects.
Also at my day job there is a photo in our filing system that
though bad one cannot deny the contrasting beauty of nature. This
photo was taken in winter. There was an apartment fire. From the
parking lot you see the still smoldering flames not too many feet in
the background while in the front you see icicles hanging from the
carport and a small tree totally encased in ice. the heat of the fire
was so close as to even create a puddle on the parkway next to the
tree.Subject wise it really is a photo brimming in compesition.
CARE TAKE!!!
Victoria
"...when I dream and fall asleep you take my breath away,I'm colder,it's darker now.....you were the Lucky one,that never had to say goodbye."
Catlash Productions: http://catlashproductions.bravepages.com/index.html
http://www.redcross.org
http://www.GothsAgainstHate.com
http://www.WallofTolerance.com
"...I don't know any of you." posted by Ivan the Idiotic on Monday,24 March 2003 after many long past diatribes of challenges presuming to know exactly who I and many others of ok.general are yet never having balls enough to prove it.
Full Moon
"Michael A. Clem" wrote:
Oh yeah Jollytime Popcorn. :-)
Full Moon
Uncle Jerry wrote:
You busy??? Ha!! Ha!! Yeah your real busy :-) busy sniffing up turds? or
out begging for help finding proof of life? Nothing is going to help your
problems fatjerry(tm) Ha!! Ha!! Bet that lady friend of yours gets tired of
pushing you around in that wheel chair. :-)
Full Moon
Condor Chef wrote:
Oh yeah Jollytime Popcorn. :-) How that?
Full Moon
Uncle Jerry wrote:
Your picture taking goons need help. :-) like the auto picture the quality
of your pictures are really poor.
Full Moon
Uncle Jerry wrote:
WoW!!! you have a DVD? Now thats news. Ha!! Ha!!
Full Moon
Bill wrote:
> Uncle Jerry <bubba...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:bq1a3k$3dm$0...@pita.alt.net:
> When was the last time you saw the verb "tasked" in a newsgroup? The
> sudden change of tone was interesting.
>
> --
> Surf...@cs.invalid
> Replace invalid with com to reply by email.
Oh yeah Jollytime Popcorn.
Condor Chef
"Full Moon" <zipzippippipywam...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FC4B256...@hotmail.com...
>
> Oh yeah Jollytime Popcorn. :-) How that?
You're welcome, glad I could help.
CC
Ralph Nesbitt
"victoria" <catlashpr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qnb8sv88etk9phsok...@4ax.com...
>
> This reminds me- in Norway Lillehamer's Olympic Village is still
> alive and kicking and in use. Outside the village are two odd, tall,
> nearly spire like metal structures that go straight upwards from what
> for all purposes appears to be large metal candle holders. These
> things have lights of various colours at the base and the spires
> appear grated. There are thin filaments of wiring wrapped loosely and
> randomly from the 'candle holder' portion to the tip of the spire.
> During the Olympics these things had sprays of water coming up and
> projecting above the night before the intended display time so that
> come time for them to be displayed what you would see would be a
> brilliant and sometimes delicately 'laced' natural ice sculpture
> underlit in different colours.Since how the sculpture appeared was
> completly dependant on temperature and climate each day's design
> differed from the last. They sometimes would even 'jet' out the
> water-stopping and starting it to get different effects.
> Also at my day job there is a photo in our filing system that
> though bad one cannot deny the contrasting beauty of nature. This
> photo was taken in winter. There was an apartment fire. From the
> parking lot you see the still smoldering flames not too many feet in
> the background while in the front you see icicles hanging from the
> carport and a small tree totally encased in ice. the heat of the fire
> was so close as to even create a puddle on the parkway next to the
> tree.Subject wise it really is a photo brimming in compesition.
>
Set" with Ice on their back as steam rose from the street in front of them.
What is truly fun is getting up fire hose after minor seepage at each
coupling has created a puddle "Ice around them.
Ralph Nesbitt
Ralph Nesbitt
victoria
Bet that is an awesome photo. contrasts like that are simply
amazing.
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:55:26 GMT, "Ralph Nesbitt"
<ralph-...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>
>I have a news paper pic from some years ago of a FD crew operating a "Deck
>Set" with Ice on their back as steam rose from the street in front of them.
>
>What is truly fun is getting up fire hose after minor seepage at each
>coupling has created a puddle "Ice around them.
>Ralph Nesbitt
>Ralph Nesbitt
>
CARE TAKE!!!
Michael A. Clem
Full Moon wrote:
> Oh yeah Jollytime Popcorn. :-)
Nah, Jollytime is cheap--get Act II instead! Or Orville Redenbacher's...
Uncle Jerry
<I.am.me.as...@the.walrus.com> wrote:
<snip>
> I should have gone by our place - we never turn the sprinklers off,
>it seems. Would kind of suck for them to kill off their expensive
>landscaping. Oh well, maybe as a replacement, they can just put a big
>shrub in the middle of the parking lot, I understand that's a popular
>feature around these parts.
Not just a shrub.
To be Okie Chic(tm) the landscaping must include one shrub, one tree,
both untrimmed, and of course one junk car leaking oil.
Uncle Jerry
He probably can't afford Act II or Orville Redenbacher's.
Maybe someone will have mercy upon him and put together a Christmas
basket of goodies and hang it on the bars of his cell, oops, I mean
his window, on Christmas Eve...
Full Moon
"Michael A. Clem" wrote:
Popcorn is Popcorn stupid. :-)
Full Moon
Uncle Jerry wrote:
That would be nice. :-)
Full Moon
"Bŕidh Stidean" wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 22:46:51 -0600, Uncle Jerry
> <bubba...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 23:40:47 -0600, Bŕidh Stidean
> In truth, Okie Chic(tm) is not possible - they'll tow the beater off
> if it's there overnight. Of course, we're in a high-end office
> complex in one of the wealthiest parts of town, we have our standards.
> Plus, being a Jet City company, we like our landscaping to look like
> landscaping - and Okie Chic(tm) detracts from all the post-modern
> architecture imported down here.
Your still just a little crappy renter giving what money you have to a
landlord. So enjoy the "post-modern architecture.. imported? Ha!! Ha!! :-)
your a fool crispycritterchickenshit(tm) Now get over to your mommys for TG
dinner you little sucking sponge.
Mercutio Jones
> But then, I've
> seen that shitbox you call a house, so I'm not surprised you don't
> know jack about architectural design.
I missed that, can someone post an URL?
--
**************************
Mercutio Jones
http://groups.msn.com/DayoftheSick
http://dayofthesick.oklahomapunkscene.com
************************************************
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Uncle Jerry
<I.am.me.as...@the.walrus.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:35:47 -0600, "Mercutio Jones"
><lawt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Bàidh Stidean" <I.am.me.as...@the.walrus.com> wrote in message
>>news:oqicsv0rvk6n5v4fh...@4ax.com...
>>> But then, I've
>>> seen that shitbox you call a house, so I'm not surprised you don't
>>> know jack about architectural design.
>>
>>I missed that, can someone post an URL?
>
>http://www.bubbaworld.com/pics/la-casa-de-okie.jpg
>
> Love the decorative bars - adds so much to the beauty of the
>property...
It all comes back to Okie Chic(tm).
You see the Average Okie(tm) having 'done time' in at least one Okie
Penal Institution(tm) considers bars on windows and doors as being a
'natural state of affairs'.
Therefore when the Average Okie(tm) goes looking for a house he seeks
one with which he can identify, one in which he will feel 'at home', a
place similar to that of his youth, reform school.
If he can't find a place which reminds him of prison, he will take
what he has and make it look a prison, complete with bars, security
lights and possibly a guard tower or two in the backyard.
Uncle Jerry
<I.am.me.as...@the.walrus.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 22:46:51 -0600, Uncle Jerry
><bubba...@hotmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
>>To be Okie Chic(tm) the landscaping must include one shrub, one tree,
>>both untrimmed, and of course one junk car leaking oil.
>
> In truth, Okie Chic(tm) is not possible - they'll tow the beater off
>if it's there overnight. Of course, we're in a high-end office
>complex in one of the wealthiest parts of town, we have our standards.
>Plus, being a Jet City company, we like our landscaping to look like
>landscaping - and Okie Chic(tm) detracts from all the post-modern
>architecture imported down here.
Okie Chic(tm) is possibly only when one lives in the equivalent of
Redneck Estates(tm).
Elsewhere, even in Oklahoma, keeping a twenty plus year old, oil
leaking beater, complete with roof falling off in the driveway will
result in the neighbors getting up a petition to have the offender
tossed out of the housing addition for violating covenants which
prohibit such conduct.
Of course in Redneck Estates(tm) or its equivalent, a junk car in the
driveway, bars on the windows and overgrown shrubbery are considered a
'status symbol' and a goal to be attained.
Full Moon
"Bŕidh Stidean" wrote:
> You know, I don't think I can ever say that I truly hated someone,
> especially someone I've never met. You, however, may be the
> exception. You are just a vile, worthless, excuse for a person.
> Learn to fucking read, asshole, I was talking about our company
> offices, which are in a very exclusive area of town, and are built in
> a post-modern style, which isn't common in Oklahoma. But then, I've
> seen that shitbox you call a house, so I'm not surprised you don't
> know jack about architectural design.
I know enough about what you have posted to understand your a loser and a
sucking little shithead. I really am LMAO at you. Ha!! Ha!! Now did you help
wash the dinner dishs? or did you sneek off like the worthless rat you are and
let your mommy do the cleaning up? I know the answer <grin> You little prick on
the ass of a lizard. :-)
Full Moon
"Bŕidh Stidean" wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:35:47 -0600, "Mercutio Jones"
> <lawt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Bŕidh Stidean" <I.am.me.as...@the.walrus.com> wrote in message
> >news:oqicsv0rvk6n5v4fh...@4ax.com...
> >> But then, I've
> >> seen that shitbox you call a house, so I'm not surprised you don't
> >> know jack about architectural design.
> >
> >I missed that, can someone post an URL?
>
> http://www.bubbaworld.com/pics/la-casa-de-okie.jpg
>
> Love the decorative bars - adds so much to the beauty of the
> property...
Did that pic come from space? Ha!! Ha!! what quality :-)
Full Moon
Uncle Jerry wrote:
Hay turdsniffer(tm) On another subject did you and your shackup go to the
John 316 for TG dinner? :-)
Morning Sun
"Bŕidh Stidean" wrote:
> Like you're a fucking gourmet, asshole. I bet all the little ghetto
> girls are visiting their ghetto relatives today - better get out there
> with your camera.
Get to bed early little moocher you need to be alert tomorow when answering the
phone calls at work. :-)
Morning Sun
"Bŕidh Stidean" wrote:
> I didn't take it, have no idea who did. Besides, it's not the
> quality of the picture that tells the story here, it's the subject
> matter.
Well if you can really see the subject matter in that picture you must have
some special correcting eye sight. Because the picture is almost unviewable.
It's a crappy picture. Jerry needs help. :-) All his pictures that he has made
viewable have been crappy. Oh well the truth hurts Ha!! Ha!!
Morning Sun
"Bŕidh Stidean" wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:32:01 GMT, Full Moon
> You don't know jack shit, and have proved it once again. You don't
> know the first thing about me, you just grasp at straws and come up
> short constantly.
Well I think I have been pretty close about everything so far. Did you help your
mommy with the cleanup? Just answer my question little crispycritterchickenshit(tm).
Morning Sun
"Bŕidh Stidean" wrote:
> Yet another clueless guess by a clueless git. Why so sour a mood,
> the Ghetto Chicks(tm) wearing too many clothes for you to add to your
> picture collection?
Whats really funny is you trying to learn to use that stupid PALM Ha!! Ha!! I bet
it's under your pillow with all them funkey music CDs you have. <grin>
Uncle Jerry
<I.am.me.as...@the.walrus.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:33:47 GMT, Full Moon
><zipzippippipywam...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
<snip>
>>Did that pic come from space? Ha!! Ha!! what quality :-)
>
> I didn't take it, have no idea who did. Besides, it's not the
>quality of the picture that tells the story here, it's the subject
>matter.
Yeah, that's what I thought.
That's why I reduced, blurred and even pixelated the license tag area
of the 'Rustbucket' picture and why I reduced and blurred the
'La-Casa' picture.
I guess I could stop 'being nice' and display these and a few others
which have come into my possession, in their original format.
In that condition they are a lot clearer, and the detail such as
license plate numbers are so easy to read.
Here, let's have a demo.
The picture at:
http://www.bubbaworld.com/pics/trashday.jpg
is a crop of the lower right portion of the picture from which the
'Rustbucket' picture originated.
It was made on 10/20/03, at 1:22 pm, at least according to the clock
built into the camera which took the snapshot.
Evidently it was 'trashday'. I have no idea, as I have no idea who
actually took the picture or the others, as they were e-mailed to me
anonymously.
So yeah, I guess I could place these anonymous pictures on-line in
their original format if Ivan really, really wants to see them that
way.
Or I guess I could just e-mail them to anyone interested.
No big deal, really...
Uncle Jerry
<I.am.me.as...@the.walrus.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:44:03 -0600, Uncle Jerry
><bubba...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
<snip>
>>Here, let's have a demo.
>>
>>The picture at:
>>
>>http://www.bubbaworld.com/pics/trashday.jpg
>>
>>is a crop of the lower right portion of the picture from which the
>>'Rustbucket' picture originated.
>>
<snip>
> Well, jusdging by the number of branches sticking out of the top
>sack, it appears the homeowner did manage to start cleaning up that
>yard of his. I wouldn't get on his case for the trash, though -
>around the area of OKC where I live, they only do a "large item
>pickup" once a month, so there's an unusual amount of bulky itmes on
>the curbs when that day rolls around. Other days, if it doesn't fit
>in the can, it gets left.
Agreed.
What I did find hilarious however was that the trash awaiting pickup
was piled right next to the cordoba, it too awaiting pickup.
Evidently the trash haulers considered the cordoba a "large item" and
left it behind.
Again.
Maybe he needs to move it a little closer to the curb.
But trash aside, as usual, the obvious escapes the Ivan Fish(tm).
Sure the pictures are 'poor quality'.
I took steps to insure the versions posted to the web site were of
'poor quality'. This in order to conceal identifiable information
while still conveying the basic idea.
Since the pictures were taken from a public street and present a view
available to anyone that cares to walk or drive by and 'take a look',
or take pictures for that matter, I have no obligation legal or moral
to do anything to conceal identifiable information. In spite of that,
I did 'give him a break'.
Does anyone believe for a second he would extend the same courtesy to
any of us?
Star full night
Uncle Jerry wrote:
Well by all means lets see what you have. :-) Make my day asshole Ho!!
Ho!!
Michael A. Clem
Hmm...I wouldn't say that popcorn is stupid--it's quite healthy if
popped in a low-cholesterol oil (don't use coconut oil) and if you don't
add a lot of butter and stuff to it.
~;-^)
Steve Henderson
"Michael A. Clem" <mc...@vigoris.net> wrote in message
news:3fcb...@news.vigoris.net...
> >Popcorn is Popcorn stupid. :-)
> >
> >
> >
> Hmm...I wouldn't say that popcorn is stupid--it's quite healthy if
> popped in a low-cholesterol oil (don't use coconut oil) and if you don't
> add a lot of butter and stuff to it.
It must be something similar to "Mingo Bitch".
Michael A. Clem
Doesn't she work at that little massage parlor behind the pawn shop?
Flowing River
"Michael A. Clem" wrote:
Is that where jerrys girlfriend works? :-) or your mother? Ha!!Ha!!
Michael A. Clem
> > >
> > Doesn't she work at that little massage parlor behind the pawn shop?
>
> Is that where jerrys girlfriend works? :-) or your mother? Ha!!Ha!!
>
Oh, no. Slipbatched by Mr. JollyTime...
Bright Light
"Bŕidh Stidean" wrote:
> Is that what he calls himself in his vocation as a "child
> photographer"? That's just sick...
Coming from someone who had to be dragged into court for non-payment of his
debts. That's just sick.. <grin>
Candle Light
"Bŕidh Stidean" wrote:
> I wasn't "dragged in" anywhere - liar. I told them I would fight
> it, because I thought the charges were invalid. That is my right as a
> U.S. citizen, and I did that and I lost - so I paid it and moved on.
> Why do you conveniently leave out the fact that I have paid everything
> - and did it immediately? Oh yeah, you're a malicious liar. That was
> two years ago, and so far in my past that I don't really give a damn.
> I'll just be here to set the record straight every time you wish to
> pass off another malicious lie. And every time you want to dredge up
> things in my past that have *no* relevance to who I am today, I will
> bring up your past. And you're proving that harassment and malicious
> behaviour is still very much relevant to who you are today. Turnabout
> is fair play and the only way I'm going to stop is if you grow up and
> be a man for once and realize what is past is past.
When you stop posting lies about peoples pictures. <smile>
Candle Light
"Bŕidh Stidean" wrote:
> You cannot prove that it is a lie when someone says you're taking
> pictures of young girls, because there *are* young girls in the
> picture. I can prove what you say about me is a lie, as the facts
> don't support you. Apples and oranges.
> You don't get it, people are having fun at your expense because
> you're an asshole. If anyone seriously thought you were some kind of
> voyeur snapping pictures of girls with bad intent, someone would have
> turned you into the police long ago.
> It's not like we don't know who
> you are and where you live.
I take this as a direct threat. Remember I told you this. :-)
======================
> You started attacking people, and just
> like the RSFCkers found out, when you come in here on the attack,
> we're going to find out about you and have a hell of a lot of fun at
> your expense. This is Usenet, remember - it's not real life. But
> people like you seem to forget that and take electronic banter into
> real life in order to harm people. That's not going to win you any
> driends, and it definitely guarantees you a very hard time in whatever
> group you decided to act like that in.
Patrick Humphrey
>"Bàidh Stidean" wrote:
[...]
>> >When you stop posting lies about peoples pictures. <smile>
>> You cannot prove that it is a lie when someone says you're taking
>> pictures of young girls, because there *are* young girls in the
>> picture. I can prove what you say about me is a lie, as the facts
>> don't support you. Apples and oranges.
>> You don't get it, people are having fun at your expense because
>> you're an asshole. If anyone seriously thought you were some kind of
>> voyeur snapping pictures of girls with bad intent, someone would have
>> turned you into the police long ago.
>> It's not like we don't know who
>> you are and where you live.
>I take this as a direct threat. Remember I told you this. :-)
Take it any way you want, Ivan -- because wiser people than you will take
notice if you follow through on your none too subtle threat and come to the
same conclusion that you alone deny: you're a certifiable asshole, and you're
good for target practice and not much else.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
Bell Ringing
Patrick Humphrey wrote:
> Candle Light <wonderspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> >"Bàidh Stidean" wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> >When you stop posting lies about peoples pictures. <smile>
>
> >> You cannot prove that it is a lie when someone says you're taking
> >> pictures of young girls, because there *are* young girls in the
> >> picture. I can prove what you say about me is a lie, as the facts
> >> don't support you. Apples and oranges.
> >> You don't get it, people are having fun at your expense because
> >> you're an asshole. If anyone seriously thought you were some kind of
> >> voyeur snapping pictures of girls with bad intent, someone would have
> >> turned you into the police long ago.
>
> >> It's not like we don't know who
> >> you are and where you live.
>
> >I take this as a direct threat. Remember I told you this. :-)
>
> Take it any way you want, Ivan -- because wiser people than you will take
> notice if you follow through on your none too subtle threat and come to the
> same conclusion that you alone deny: you're a certifiable asshole, and you're
> good for target practice and not much else.
>
And you mr.convicted SEX offender in the state of Texas you should talk "post"
Ha!! Ha!! bet they still are talking about you over at Rice U. jerking off in a
classroom. what a jerk Oh jerkoff Ha!! Ha!! what does Dale think of that
mr.pattywattysexoffender(tm)? You make a pretty nice target yourself :-)
Patrick Humphrey
How many hundred more lame disguises are you going to use this year, Ivan?
You're over 200 in the last 16 months.
>Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>> Candle Light <wonderspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>> >"Bŕidh Stidean" wrote:
>> [...]
Really, Ivan? I dare you to get off your necrotic ass and back up your libel
with action: call HPD and tell them I'm a convicted sex offender. What
happens when they can't find any such records anywhere?
Post the proof or suffer the consequences. (Take that any way you wish --
you'll guess wrong, because it's all you can do.)
Bell Ringing
Patrick Humphrey wrote:
> And I guess your going to post that this STALKER is also no you Patrick L
> Humphrey?
Patrick Humphrey
>Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>> >> Candle Light <wonderspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>> >> >"Bŕidh Stidean" wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> And I guess your going to post that this STALKER is also no you Patrick L
>> Humphrey?
You might want to look at who posted it -- "Pat Blakely" was a known Nazi
supporter in alt.revisionism, and for some reason he ran away...maybe because
the person using that name was, and is, a two-time convicted felon right next
door to you in Arkansas. If you're so sure, why haven't YOU called HPD yet?
You're obstructing justice if you don't report me, if you're so sure I've
committed a crime. 713-308-8000 is the number to call. What's keeping you?
Bell Ringing
Patrick Humphrey wrote:
> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>
> >> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> >> How many hundred more lame disguises are you going to use this year, Ivan?
> >> You're over 200 in the last 16 months.
>
> >> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>
> >> >> Candle Light <wonderspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
Obstructing Justice? Ha!! Ha!! Oh yeah Jollytime Popcorn <smile> Have you saved any babies today?
Bell Ringing
Patrick Humphrey wrote:
> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>
> >> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> >> How many hundred more lame disguises are you going to use this year, Ivan?
> >> You're over 200 in the last 16 months.
>
> >> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>
> >> >> Candle Light <wonderspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
Hear is another: What about your picture taking mr.stalker?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+Patrick+L.+Humphrey&start=20&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=fusg2t4q39omnknuojvaq74efuggvg437m%404ax.com&rnum=25
Bell Ringing
Patrick Humphrey wrote:
> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>
> >> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> >> How many hundred more lame disguises are you going to use this year, Ivan?
> >> You're over 200 in the last 16 months.
>
> >> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>
> >> >> Candle Light <wonderspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
WoW!! you sure cause a lot of problems for people:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+Patrick+L.+Humphrey&start=30&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=0l63nt8ujip4ef17c3chlev712f507bscf%404ax.com&rnum=32
Patrick Humphrey
>Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
[...]
>> You might want to look at who posted it -- "Pat Blakely" was a known Nazi
>> supporter in alt.revisionism, and for some reason he ran away...maybe because
>> the person using that name was, and is, a two-time convicted felon right next
>> door to you in Arkansas. If you're so sure, why haven't YOU called HPD yet?
>> You're obstructing justice if you don't report me, if you're so sure I've
>> committed a crime. 713-308-8000 is the number to call. What's keeping you?
>Obstructing Justice? Ha!! Ha!! Oh yeah Jollytime Popcorn <smile> Have you
>saved any babies today?
If you're so sure I've committed a crime, you can be held accountable for your
actions if you fail to report me...and you were obviously impressed enough to
try calling me about six minutes ago, from the same number that you've used so
many times before. I guess the folks at Williams might want to know that
you're back to your usual tactics.
Patrick Humphrey
>Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
[...]
>> You might want to look at who posted it -- "Pat Blakely" was a known Nazi
>> supporter in alt.revisionism, and for some reason he ran away...maybe
>> because the person using that name was, and is, a two-time convicted felon
>> right next door to you in Arkansas. If you're so sure, why haven't YOU
>> called HPD yet? You're obstructing justice if you don't report me, if
>> you're so sure I've committed a crime. 713-308-8000 is the number to call.
>> What's keeping you?
>Hear is another: What about your picture taking mr.stalker?
What about it? That's the fantasy of your Nazikook pal R. Scott "Doc Tavish"
Bradbury, who keeps whining that I've taken pictures of the dump he lives in.
One small problem, though -- I've never had a camera with me the few times
I've been through his town, because I've been there while pedaling through on
the way to Austin in the annual MS Society fund-raiser ride. Thanks for
showing what a slut you are, Ivan -- you'll lie down and spread wide for
anyone who attacks me or your other targets, no matter how subhuman they act.
Keep up the good work, Prank Caller Boy! (While you're at it, you might want
to take a look at www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/tavish.php -- since it's in
Google, it *has* to be true, right?)
Patrick Humphrey
>Patrick Humphrey wrote:
[...]
>> You might want to look at who posted it -- "Pat Blakely" was a known Nazi
>> supporter in alt.revisionism, and for some reason he ran away...maybe
>> because the person using that name was, and is, a two-time convicted felon
>> right next door to you in Arkansas. If you're so sure, why haven't YOU
>> called HPD yet? You're obstructing justice if you don't report me, if
>> you're so sure I've committed a crime. 713-308-8000 is the number to call.
>> What's keeping you?
>WoW!! you sure cause a lot of problems for people:
Wow. You sure are abusing your employer's time and money.
Bell Ringing
Patrick Humphrey wrote:
> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>
> >> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> >http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+Patrick+L.+Humphrey&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=6z7t8.40570%24XP2.13479960%40typhoon.southeast.rr.com&rnum=7
>
> >> You might want to look at who posted it -- "Pat Blakely" was a known Nazi
> >> supporter in alt.revisionism, and for some reason he ran away...maybe because
> >> the person using that name was, and is, a two-time convicted felon right next
> >> door to you in Arkansas. If you're so sure, why haven't YOU called HPD yet?
> >> You're obstructing justice if you don't report me, if you're so sure I've
> >> committed a crime. 713-308-8000 is the number to call. What's keeping you?
>
> >Obstructing Justice? Ha!! Ha!! Oh yeah Jollytime Popcorn <smile> Have you
> >saved any babies today?
>
> If you're so sure I've committed a crime, you can be held accountable for your
> actions if you fail to report me...and you were obviously impressed enough to
> try calling me about six minutes ago, from the same number that you've used so
> many times before. I guess the folks at Williams might want to know that
> you're back to your usual tactics.
>
Well you jerks have contacted them before and I have been questioned and nothing has happened. And I hope you called your local police and reported
your thinking I am calling you. Or are you not wishing to speak to your local police? Maybe they know a lot about you. <smile>
Bell Ringing
Patrick Humphrey wrote:
> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> You might want to look at who posted it -- "Pat Blakely" was a known Nazi
> >> supporter in alt.revisionism, and for some reason he ran away...maybe
> >> because the person using that name was, and is, a two-time convicted felon
> >> right next door to you in Arkansas. If you're so sure, why haven't YOU
> >> called HPD yet? You're obstructing justice if you don't report me, if
> >> you're so sure I've committed a crime. 713-308-8000 is the number to call.
> >> What's keeping you?
>
> >WoW!! you sure cause a lot of problems for people:
>
> Wow. You sure are abusing your employer's time and money.
>
> Well maybe you need to contact them again. :-)
Patrick Humphrey
>Patrick Humphrey wrote:
[...]
>> If you're so sure I've committed a crime, you can be held accountable for
>> your actions if you fail to report me...and you were obviously impressed
>> enough to try calling me about six minutes ago, from the same number that
>> you've used so many times before. I guess the folks at Williams might want
>> to know that you're back to your usual tactics.
>Well you jerks have contacted them before and I have been questioned and
>nothing has happened. And I hope you called your local police and reported
>your thinking I am calling you. Or are you not wishing to speak to your local
>police? Maybe they know a lot about you. <smile>
Why should I call HPD for you calling me? You're not in Houston. Of course,
the cops know a thing about me that you'd rather not have to deal with: my
criminal record consists of a couple of traffic tickets -- and nothing else.
The only time my name has shown up in any court record is when I was either on
a jury panel or serving on a jury in a state court. Feel free to try and
prove *that* wrong.
Bell Ringing
Patrick Humphrey wrote:
> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> If you're so sure I've committed a crime, you can be held accountable for
> >> your actions if you fail to report me...and you were obviously impressed
> >> enough to try calling me about six minutes ago, from the same number that
> >> you've used so many times before. I guess the folks at Williams might want
> >> to know that you're back to your usual tactics.
>
> >Well you jerks have contacted them before and I have been questioned and
> >nothing has happened. And I hope you called your local police and reported
> >your thinking I am calling you. Or are you not wishing to speak to your local
> >police? Maybe they know a lot about you. <smile>
>
> Why should I call HPD for you calling me? You're not in Houston. Of course,
> the cops know a thing about me that you'd rather not have to deal with: my
> criminal record consists of a couple of traffic tickets -- and nothing else.
> The only time my name has shown up in any court record is when I was either on
> a jury panel or serving on a jury in a state court. Feel free to try and
> prove *that* wrong.
>
Well then don't bitch about getting the calls. If you don't wish to report them
thats your problem not mine. <smile> And why do I get this feeling your hiding a
lot about your court records. :-)
Patrick Humphrey
>Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>
>> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
[...]
>> >WoW!! you sure cause a lot of problems for people:
>> Wow. You sure are abusing your employer's time and money.
> Well maybe you need to contact them again. :-)
That would be no small feat, considering I've yet to contact them the first
time, let alone again.
Patrick Humphrey
>Patrick Humphrey wrote:
[...]
>> Why should I call HPD for you calling me? You're not in Houston. Of
>> course, the cops know a thing about me that you'd rather not have to deal
>> with: my criminal record consists of a couple of traffic tickets -- and
>> nothing else. The only time my name has shown up in any court record is
>> when I was either on a jury panel or serving on a jury in a state court.
>> Feel free to try and prove *that* wrong.
>Well then don't bitch about getting the calls. If you don't wish to report
>them thats your problem not mine. <smile> And why do I get this feeling your
>hiding a lot about your court records. :-)
Because you're a demonstrated liar, Ivan. I just told you what's in my court
record -- I can't hide what isn't there to start with, so if you're going to
"prove" anything about me, you're going to have to lie even more. Please show
even more people how little you're worth as a human being.
victoria
Not only that but if anyone suspects child abuse of any sort, or
actually knows of it then by law they MUST report it for the one that
knows yet does not report it is behaving illegally as well.
So if he says you are a criminal yet does not report it then he too
is a criminal, having committed just what you have told him.
On 11 Dec 2003 16:16:27 -0600, Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com>
wrote:
CARE TAKE!!!
Victoria
"...when I dream and fall asleep you take my breath away,I'm colder,it's darker now.....you were the Lucky one,that never had to say goodbye."
Catlash Productions: http://catlashproductions.bravepages.com/index.html
http://www.redcross.org
http://www.GothsAgainstHate.com
http://www.WallofTolerance.com
"...I don't know any of you." posted by Ivan the Idiotic on Monday,24 March 2003 after many long past diatribes of challenges presuming to know exactly who I and many others of ok.general are yet never having balls enough to prove it.
Bell Ringing
Patrick Humphrey wrote:
> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> Why should I call HPD for you calling me? You're not in Houston. Of
> >> course, the cops know a thing about me that you'd rather not have to deal
> >> with: my criminal record consists of a couple of traffic tickets -- and
> >> nothing else. The only time my name has shown up in any court record is
> >> when I was either on a jury panel or serving on a jury in a state court.
> >> Feel free to try and prove *that* wrong.
>
> >Well then don't bitch about getting the calls. If you don't wish to report
> >them thats your problem not mine. <smile> And why do I get this feeling your
> >hiding a lot about your court records. :-)
>
> Because you're a demonstrated liar, Ivan. I just told you what's in my court
> record -- I can't hide what isn't there to start with, so if you're going to
> "prove" anything about me, you're going to have to lie even more. Please show
> even more people how little you're worth as a human being.
>
It's a lot more fun showing everyone reading the posts what a stupid asshole you
are. :-) You sure have pissed off a lot of people. <grin>
Bell Ringing
Patrick Humphrey wrote:
> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
> >
> >> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> >WoW!! you sure cause a lot of problems for people:
>
> >> Wow. You sure are abusing your employer's time and money.
>
> > Well maybe you need to contact them again. :-)
>
> That would be no small feat, considering I've yet to contact them the first
> time, let alone again.
>
Well then get your loving butthole buddy fatnastyunclejerry(tm) to do your
dirty work. You bitch and wiggle like a little baby girl :-) How does Dale put
up with you? Now crawl back into your little kilbo world and save babies.
Bell Ringing
victoria wrote:
> Not only that but if anyone suspects child abuse of any sort, or
> actually knows of it then by law they MUST report it for the one that
> knows yet does not report it is behaving illegally as well.
> So if he says you are a criminal yet does not report it then he too
> is a criminal, having committed just what you have told him.
>
Well vickeybickeycatnabberasscratcher(tm) Get on with reporting me. :-) remember them little young girls? Go to it <grin> I guess the BIG trip with crispycrittercrook(tm) to BIG "D" is not gonna happen. Whats wrong your fancy family auto
won't start? Ha!! Ha!! Call a cab dimbulb. Ha!! Ha!!
Patrick Humphrey
>Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>
>> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
[...]
>> >Well then don't bitch about getting the calls. If you don't wish to report
>> >them thats your problem not mine. <smile> And why do I get this feeling
>> >your hiding a lot about your court records. :-)
>> Because you're a demonstrated liar, Ivan. I just told you what's in my
>> court record -- I can't hide what isn't there to start with, so if you're
>> going to "prove" anything about me, you're going to have to lie even more.
>> Please show even more people how little you're worth as a human being.
>It's a lot more fun showing everyone reading the posts what a stupid asshole
>you are. :-) You sure have pissed off a lot of people. <grin>
So? I can't help it if they're congenital losers like you. (Of course,
you're showing just how little you're worth with your response, but then,
you've never been known for actually understanding what you were getting
into.)
Patrick Humphrey
>Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>> >> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>> [...]
You're usually clueless, Ivan, but I have to admit I'm impressed by this
outburst of yours. I have no idea of what you're babbling about this time.
(Very likely, neither do you. Maybe you should finally get around to speaking
English.)
Bright Star
Patrick Humphrey wrote:
> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
> >
> >> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> >Well then don't bitch about getting the calls. If you don't wish to report
> >> >them thats your problem not mine. <smile> And why do I get this feeling
> >> >your hiding a lot about your court records. :-)
>
> >> Because you're a demonstrated liar, Ivan. I just told you what's in my
> >> court record -- I can't hide what isn't there to start with, so if you're
> >> going to "prove" anything about me, you're going to have to lie even more.
> >> Please show even more people how little you're worth as a human being.
>
> >It's a lot more fun showing everyone reading the posts what a stupid asshole
> >you are. :-) You sure have pissed off a lot of people. <grin>
>
> So? I can't help it if they're congenital losers like you. (Of course,
> you're showing just how little you're worth with your response, but then,
> you've never been known for actually understanding what you were getting
> into.)
>
I can say the same for you.. not understanding what you were getting
into. <smile>
Patrick Humphrey
>Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>> >> Bell Ringing <ponponspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>> [...]
I'm not getting into anything with which you can damage me, Ivan. You're a
stupid old man who hasn't got much of a purpose in life except to annoy
everyone else, based on your track record.
Bright Star
Patrick Humphrey wrote:
You have already gotten your BIG ulgy self into the record book. The rest is just
reading about your ugly history. <grin>
Patrick Humphrey
>Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>
>> Bright Star <bambamspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
[...]
>> >I can say the same for you.. not understanding what you were getting
>> >into. <smile>
>> I'm not getting into anything with which you can damage me, Ivan. You're a
>> stupid old man who hasn't got much of a purpose in life except to annoy
>> everyone else, based on your track record.
>You have already gotten your BIG ulgy self into the record book. The rest is
>just reading about your ugly history. <grin>
Too bad you can't dictate what others believe -- and your little proclamation
cuts both ways, whether you understand it or not. Meanwhile, I'm not the one
who's been married twice and had an EPO out on me -- I've never been arrested,
let alone tried or convicted, and the only time I've been in court was when I
was either a potential juror or an actual one. Those are the facts you don't
want anyone else to believe.
If you weren't such a consummate (and stupid) son of a bitch, someone might
actually be inclined to feel sorry for you -- but your behavior makes it
pretty sure that that will never happen in your lifetime, and most deservedly
so.
Bright Star
Patrick Humphrey wrote:
> Bright Star <bambamspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
> >
> >> Bright Star <bambamspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> >I can say the same for you.. not understanding what you were getting
> >> >into. <smile>
>
> >> I'm not getting into anything with which you can damage me, Ivan. You're a
> >> stupid old man who hasn't got much of a purpose in life except to annoy
> >> everyone else, based on your track record.
>
> >You have already gotten your BIG ulgy self into the record book. The rest is
> >just reading about your ugly history. <grin>
>
> Too bad you can't dictate what others believe -- and your little proclamation
> cuts both ways, whether you understand it or not. Meanwhile, I'm not the one
> who's been married twice and had an EPO out on me -- I've never been arrested,
> let alone tried or convicted, and the only time I've been in court was when I
> was either a potential juror or an actual one. Those are the facts you don't
> want anyone else to believe.
>
> If you weren't such a consummate (and stupid) son of a bitch, someone might
> actually be inclined to feel sorry for you -- but your behavior makes it
> pretty sure that that will never happen in your lifetime, and most deservedly
> so.
>
This should be where your netthugging pals kraftycrook(tm) and dirtyunclejerry(tm)
post some google stuff. Right? <smile> You still in the rights for life stuff?
Telling women what they can do with their bodies and their Doctors what they can
do? You low life spreader of terror.
Patrick Humphrey
>Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>> Bright Star <bambamspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
[...]
>> >You have already gotten your BIG ulgy self into the record book. The rest
>> >is just reading about your ugly history. <grin>
>> Too bad you can't dictate what others believe -- and your little
>> proclamation cuts both ways, whether you understand it or not. Meanwhile,
>> I'm not the one who's been married twice and had an EPO out on me -- I've
>> never been arrested, let alone tried or convicted, and the only time I've
>> been in court was when I was either a potential juror or an actual one.
>> Those are the facts you don't want anyone else to believe.
>> If you weren't such a consummate (and stupid) son of a bitch, someone might
>> actually be inclined to feel sorry for you -- but your behavior makes it
>> pretty sure that that will never happen in your lifetime, and most
>> deservedly so.
>This should be where your netthugging pals kraftycrook(tm) and
>dirtyunclejerry(tm) post some google stuff. Right? <smile> You still in the
>rights for life stuff? Telling women what they can do with their bodies and
>their Doctors what they can do? You low life spreader of terror.
Thanks for confirming that you're not just stupid, you're pathologically
illiterate. At least you've gone out of your way to make sure everyone knows
how credible you are, and your latest statement has all but guaranteed no one
will take you seriously -- which means your impotent attempts at libeling me
won't cause me any damage to the extent that you'll wind up defending yourself
in a court of law. (Besides, there's a court or two in Tulsa County that have
already had their fill of your presence. :-)
Bright Star
Patrick Humphrey wrote:
Any damage to your little name pattywatty was your undoing as seen in the many
google posts. Don't try blaming anything on this poster for your past sins.
> to the extent that you'll wind up defending yourself
> in a court of law.
Oh here we go with the "court" card Ha!! Ha!! I can just see you standing in court
defending yourself against usenet posts in google. You need a texansbabble(tm)
page on that selfserving web site of yours.
> (Besides, there's a court or two in Tulsa County that have
> already had their fill of your presence. :-)
Is that a fact? cool. :-)
>
>
Patrick Humphrey
>Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>> >Patrick Humphrey wrote:
>> >> Bright Star <bambamspa...@hotmail.com> writes:
>> [...]
You're the one who's so eager to have someone, anyone, pay attention to your
obsession with me. You're the one that chooses to dig things up and then lie
about them to try and cause me trouble.
>> to the extent that you'll wind up defending yourself
>> in a court of law.
>Oh here we go with the "court" card Ha!! Ha!! I can just see you standing in
>court defending yourself against usenet posts in google. You need a
>texansbabble(tm) page on that selfserving web site of yours.
Maybe you should have a literate adult explain to you what I just said.
You're responding to what you want me to say, which isn't the same thing.
>> (Besides, there's a court or two in Tulsa County that have
>> already had their fill of your presence. :-)
>Is that a fact? cool. :-)
So, are you going to claim there's *another* Ivan M. Hersh who had an EPO
taken out on him by his ex-wife?
Bright Star
Patrick Humphrey wrote:
> <snip>.
>
> >> to the extent that you'll wind up defending yourself
> >> in a court of law.
>
> >Oh here we go with the "court" card Ha!! Ha!! I can just see you standing in
> >court defending yourself against usenet posts in google. You need a
> >texansbabble(tm) page on that selfserving web site of yours.
>
> Maybe you should have a literate adult explain to you what I just said.
> You're responding to what you want me to say, which isn't the same thing.
>
> >> (Besides, there's a court or two in Tulsa County that have
> >> already had their fill of your presence. :-)
>
> >Is that a fact? cool. :-)
>
> So, are you going to claim there's *another* Ivan M. Hersh who had an EPO
> taken out on him by his ex-wife?
>
I am not saying "posting" anything dimbulb :-) I am posting is that a fact? who
cares?
Casey
"Bàidh Stidean" <I.am.me.as...@the.walrus.com> wrote in message
news:nkuatvo24i5brt8us...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:00:58 GMT, Bright Light
> <coolestsp...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >"Bàidh Stidean" wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 20:28:01 -0600, Michael A. Clem
> >> <mc...@vigoris.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In message <3FCE472B...@hotmail.com>, Flowing River wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> "Michael A. Clem" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > Doesn't she work at that little massage parlor behind the pawn
shop?
> >> >>
> >> >> Is that where jerrys girlfriend works? :-) or your mother? Ha!!Ha!!
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >Oh, no. Slipbatched by Mr. JollyTime...
> >>
> >> Is that what he calls himself in his vocation as a "child
> >> photographer"? That's just sick...
> >
> >Coming from someone who had to be dragged into court for non-payment of
his
> >debts. That's just sick.. <grin>
>
> I wasn't "dragged in" anywhere - liar. I told them I would fight
> it, because I thought the charges were invalid. That is my right as a
> U.S. citizen, and I did that and I lost - so I paid it and moved on.
> Why do you conveniently leave out the fact that I have paid everything
> - and did it immediately? Oh yeah, you're a malicious liar. That was
> two years ago, and so far in my past that I don't really give a damn.
> I'll just be here to set the record straight every time you wish to
> pass off another malicious lie. And every time you want to dredge up
> things in my past that have *no* relevance to who I am today, I will
> bring up your past. And you're proving that harassment and malicious
> behaviour is still very much relevant to who you are today. Turnabout
> is fair play and the only way I'm going to stop is if you grow up and
> be a man for once and realize what is past is past.
"What's past is past", eh? You still owe me a lot.
Bright Star
Casey wrote:
Sure would like to know more about this little item. :-)
Bright Star
"Bŕidh Stidean" wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:18:02 GMT, Bright Star
> <bambamspa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Casey wrote:
> >
> >> "Bŕidh Stidean" <I.am.me.as...@the.walrus.com> wrote in message
> Of course you would, because you are a hateful maggot. Anything
> negative, regardless of any validity to it, and you're on it like a
> hog to slop.
Now thats pretty funny coming from one of the nasty slop spreading netthugs(tm)
:-)))))))))
Uncle Jerry
<I.am.me.as...@the.walrus.com> wrote:
<snip>
> I trade in facts, not, to quote Fred Durst, the "he said-she said
>bullshit". I called you a child molester not because I ever thought
>there was one iota of truth to that claim, but rather to point out
>your hypocrisy for claiming that the post stating you were was BS
>while the one about Patrick is true. They're both false, and you
>can't have it both ways, Ivan. You hate me, just admit it, and you'll
>believe anything you read about me that's negative.
I suspect he hates everyone.
Including himself.
That would explain his cranky disposition.
Of course his 'other habits'...
Bright Star
"Bŕidh Stidean" wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:33:56 GMT, Bright Star
> I trade in facts, not, to quote Fred Durst, the "he said-she said
> bullshit". I called you a child molester not because I ever thought
> there was one iota of truth to that claim, but rather to point out
> your hypocrisy for claiming that the post stating you were was BS
> while the one about Patrick is true. They're both false, and you
> can't have it both ways, Ivan. You hate me, just admit it, and you'll
> believe anything you read about me that's negative.
How can anyone hate someone from a bunch of words posted in a usenet group? People
post things and I post things. :-)
Bright Star
"Bŕidh Stidean" wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:19:05 GMT, Bright Star
> <bambamspa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> <snip>.
> >> >
> >> >Now thats pretty funny coming from one of the nasty slop spreading netthugs(tm)
> >> >:-)))))))))
> >>
> >> I trade in facts, not, to quote Fred Durst, the "he said-she said
> >> bullshit". I called you a child molester not because I ever thought
> >> there was one iota of truth to that claim, but rather to point out
> >> your hypocrisy for claiming that the post stating you were was BS
> >> while the one about Patrick is true. They're both false, and you
> >> can't have it both ways, Ivan. You hate me, just admit it, and you'll
> >> believe anything you read about me that's negative.
> >
> >How can anyone hate someone from a bunch of words posted in a usenet group? People
> >post things and I post things. :-)
>
> You tell me, you're the one who exudes hatred at every turn,
> delighting in the alleged shortcomings of others, forging their names
> with a malicious intent, seeking to rob people of their livelihood.
> You tell me how one can hate someone from a bunch of words posted on
> Usenet, because you've demonstrated just that.
I think you should google some of your own posts also the rest of your netthugging(tm)
lie posting buddies. Before pointing a finger at someone else. :-)
Uncle Jerry
<I.am.me.as...@the.walrus.com> wrote:
<snip>
> Oh, poor baby Ivan, he's been so slighted! Wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
>Cry, baby, cry! Wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! You have got nothing more than
>you deserved, as all haters do. Nobody set out to attack you, you
>attacked first and now you have to deal with the result. Cry, baby
>Ivan, crrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrryyyyyyyyyyyyy! Wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
>You started this all, so don't even try to claim the high ground,
>crybaby.
He does whine and snivel a lot doesn't he?
It's what made him famous or more accurately *infamous*.
Well that and all his silly 'claims'...