Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Embedding digital assets
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Mandar Kulkarni  
View profile  
 More options Sep 13 2011, 12:46 pm
From: Mandar Kulkarni <mandarpkulka...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Sep 13 2011 12:46 pm
Subject: Re: Embedding digital assets
Thanks for all the replies. Those were really useful.

At the moment I have settled on an iframe pointing to a page on our
server which emits the embed HTML.

Mandar

On Sep 8, 11:05 pm, Brion Vibber <br...@pobox.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Mandar Kulkarni
> <mandarpkulka...@gmail.com>wrote:

> > Talking about embeds for videos, is it a standard practice to make
> > videos available in flash format? We allow users of our system to
> > upload any kind of asset; so videos can be anything - flash, wmv, avi
> > etc. We can create flash proxies for these. But I wanted to know what
> > is the accepted way of doing this? And same questions goes with other
> > types of assets like pdf, doc, ppts, mp3 etc.

> oEmbed doesn't directly expose the original files for video and interactive
> media types, so you can emit whatever HTML code is necessary to show an
> inline player or download gadget for the formats you choose to expose.

> My own preference is for the embedding HTML you give to just be an iframe
> with a URL, and have that load up a mini-frame that uses whatever player
> tech is appropriate for the web browser loading it.

> Don't forget that Flash isn't always available, especially on tablets and
> smartphones! If you're already converting to MP4/H.264 for Flash, I strongly
> recommend having at least an HTML 5 <video> fallback using the same file.
> (If you're brave, include WebM and Theora transcodes as well for the
> patent-free open source set! :)

> -- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com / brion @ wikimedia.org)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.