Hi all
Can we get more info on the spraying? Is it toxic to animals, should I
be worried about my cats? I'm opposed to wide-scale poison use, it's
so destructive to both bad and good plants. There's been a huge
decline in garden insects in recent years due to overuse of poisons,
which has a knock-on effect on bird and chameleon populations.
Wouldn't physically pulling out the weeds be a better (and safer)
option? Surely people could use the employment.
Jo
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Observatory Improvement District - Chat" group.
> To post to this group, send email to obsid...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to obsid-chat+...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/obsid-chat?hl=en.
>
>
--
Jonathan Endersby
Connect. Share. Trust.
www.trustfabric.com +27 82 414 3129 www.arbitraryuser.com
tfid: arbitraryuser
You have brains in your head. You have feet in your shoes. You can
steer yourself any direction you choose. - Dr Seuss
--
Dr Rob Gaylard (DLitt)
Words eKapa
Tel: +27 21 448 3882 | Fax: +27 86 540 3152 | Cell: 084 368 5327
Website: www.words-ekapa.co.za
email: in...@words-ekapa.co.za
Glyphosphates were originally developed and patented by Monsanto (the
patent has since expired). Their use has skyrocketed recently as
Monsanto's genetically-modified crops have almost all been designed with
an immunity to Roundup (their brand of glyphosphate). Contrary to the
spin, this has resulted in farmers using ever-higher dosages as they
vainly battle so-called superweeds that have developed an immunity to them.
Much farmland in the Southern US is under threat from this issue - the
giant scale farms that have gone the GM route and cannot employ manual
means are at particular risk.
When it comes to farming, the choice is clear - there are better
technologies, such as organics and permaculture, to show the way.
However, when it comes to keeping cities looking attractive, the path
isn't as clear. There's no need for Obs to re-invent the wheel - rather,
we can follow best practise from around the world.
Denmark has recently imposed widespread bans on the spraying of
glyphospates after independent tests found that the level of groundwater
contamination was far beyond what the earlier, Monsanto-sponsored,
tests, had indicated. Although the evidence of harm to humans and
mammals is limited, glyphosphates have generally been found to be
harmful in aquatic environments, and to amphibians.
Most industry-sponsored tests are superficial, short-term, and avoid
looking at synergistic effects, breakdown products, and so on. We are
continually finding products that have been approved for years to have
highly undesirable effects - a result of the almost complete lack of
independent testing, and relying on the industry concerned to design and
often carry out the safety tests.
A number of cities are grappling with the issue. Augusta placed a
moratorium on their usage after widespread health concerns. However,
they haven't yet found an adequate alternative, and after receiving
feedback that the verges were looking more unsightly, and of potential
damage to infrastructure, they started spraying again this month.
Thanks for raising the issue. In short, I am unhappy about using
glyphosphates, but don't have a practical alternative suggestion to
keeping the verges clean. I'll do some more research on the issue and
report back any findings.
--
Ian Gilfillan
Director
Ethical Co-op
www.ethical.org.za
I'd be keen to hear from the ecology group about their big picture view of
the ecology and biodiversity issues in Obs, given that we are one of the few
suburbs with a river running through it and in the biodiverse Western Cape
and close to a national park and an urban park