New requests

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Henri Tremblay

unread,
Nov 1, 2010, 4:08:03 PM11/1/10
to objene...@googlegroups.com
Hi,

We just had two requests about Objenesis.

One is to handle Apache Harmony. The other is about Google App Engine.

I think it could be a good idea to support both. However, I'm not sure I'll have the time to have a look these days.

So if you have any ideas to push it forward, I'm listening :-)

Cheers,
Henri

P.S.: In case you wonder, it's not a dead project. In fact, it's pretty much the reference to instantiate objects from what I hear.

Bubble

unread,
Nov 1, 2010, 7:30:32 PM11/1/10
to objene...@googlegroups.com
Hi!

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Henri Tremblay <henri.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

We just had two requests about Objenesis.

One is to handle Apache Harmony. The other is about Google App Engine.

The requester to the Apache Harmony change mentioned he had an idea how to do it, I believe we should accept a contribution. As for the Google App Engine, I don't think it would be possible because it's a sandboxed environment, and something like Objenesis could be used on an hypothetical security violation (e.g., feeding objects that violate some invariant into some method that doesn't validate input).
 

I think it could be a good idea to support both. However, I'm not sure I'll have the time to have a look these days.

And I'm sure I won't have the time to have a look any time soon. :-)
 

So if you have any ideas to push it forward, I'm listening :-)

See above.


Cheers,
Henri

P.S.: In case you wonder, it's not a dead project. In fact, it's pretty much the reference to instantiate objects from what I hear.

That's nice to hear! Do you have any reference to that?

Cheers,
Bubble

Jörg Schaible

unread,
Nov 2, 2010, 2:15:36 PM11/2/10
to objene...@googlegroups.com
Hi Henri,

On Dienstag, 2. November 2010, Bubble wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Henri Tremblay
<henri.t...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We just had two requests about Objenesis.
> >
> > One is to handle Apache Harmony. The other is about Google App Engine.
>
> The requester to the Apache Harmony change mentioned he had an idea how to
> do it, I believe we should accept a contribution. As for the Google App
> Engine, I don't think it would be possible because it's a sandboxed
> environment, and something like Objenesis could be used on an hypothetical
> security violation (e.g., feeding objects that violate some invariant into
> some method that doesn't validate input).

XStream has a variant in its source, but it is not stable. Running all ~1000
unit tests at some point the JVM crashes. However, the last time I really
tried was with M4 - and that's now quite along time.

- Jörg

Henri Tremblay

unread,
Feb 22, 2011, 8:15:05 PM2/22/11
to objene...@googlegroups.com
Hi,

Thanks a lot for the information. I'll have a look.

Cheers,
Henri

Henri Tremblay

unread,
Feb 22, 2011, 8:20:36 PM2/22/11
to objene...@googlegroups.com
Yes. I agree.

For Google App Engine, they managed to have stuff like Groovy running. I believe something could be done for Objenesis.

About the reference, I need to remember where I got that....
-
Henri

P.S.: Sorry for the super late answer of this and all the following mails. I just dumbly discovered that the Objenesis mails were going somewhere hidden.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages