Congrats to the 280 North guys. Looks like good progress is being
made with Atlas. Good luck with that final 'push' phase. I guess
most of us know what that's like.
Like many others here, I'm very impressed with Cappuccino. I'm amazed
at how much there is, and from what I can gather how quickly this has
all been assembled.
There's clearly still a way to go on both features and stability
front, but modulo a collection of acquired bumps and bruises along the
way, Cappuccino is already remarkable and truly valuable.
Now, regarding Atlas, as Jerome comments above, I think I would like
to understand more about the pricing intentions as soon as possible.
I'm more than glad to support 280 North with some revenue (I know how
far that can go when you're at the thin end of the wedge), but aside
from playing with Atlas for my $20 and perhaps helping with final
polish by way of testing, I'm going to want to understand what the
intended license deal will be.
For me, my use of Cappuccino is predicated on the value of the
framework (of course), and I probably would not be using it without
the current nib2cib tool. Atlas may well end up being a great
productivity tool, and that's why we buy tools - because they save us
time and indeed make our lives as developers more enjoyable. The good-
fidelity conversion of nib/xib to cib (at least that one way) will
remain a key requirement for continued use of Cappuccino, and I spend
so much time in Xcode anyway, that Xcode is likely continue to be my
editor of choice - but this is indeed where I'm curious to see how
Atlas will fit my workflows.
On Oct 2, 12:03 pm, Jérôme Denanot <
jdena...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Francisco for the info (I'm waiting for the video at ustream). Do you
> have any details to share about new features that you unveiled, screenshots,
> etc. ?
> Is the licence a per user licence ? Ross answered quickly about the full
> release being priced higher than the beta, do you have any hint about the
> price range ? Finally I suppose it will be competitive compared with other
> solutions (look at Ext JS license for example is 329$ per developer, is a
> one time fee).
>
> The only pb. is that most clients were used to use completely free
> frameworks and tools, and they generally are reluctant to pay, even if it is
> a bargain like this one. On the other hand I fully understand your business
> model and find it right (I originally suggested you could release a free
> limited edition, and a full featured - not free - version).
>
> What about the extension mechanism alla Eclipse plugins that was suggested ?
>
> Thanks and congrats !
>
> Jerome
>
> 2009/10/2 RCLConcepts <
rclconce...@gmail.com>