From: Nicole Sullivan <nic...@stubbornella.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 03:15:54 +0100
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 9:15 pm
Subject: Re: OOCSS Validation
I've written up my reasons for choosing the _ and * hacks over other
http://wiki.github.com/stubbornella/oocss/faq#hacks
Cheers,
On Nov 8, 2009, at 11:36 PM, Murray wrote:
> I've been asked to provide a solid reason why my css doesn't validate
> Using the conditional comment method, to provide older browsers with
> w3c blog has this to say about their oocss site [http://www.w3.org/
> http://www.webstandards.govt.nz/technical/, only has this to say about
> It doesn't say that the css must validate, it just says that the site
> I can't find any mention of css validation in the WCAG2.0 (AA)
> What is our stance on css validation?
Nicole Sullivan Object Oriented CSS http://wiki.github.com/stubbornella/oocss
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||