e.g.
<rdfs:label rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/
XMLSchema#string">uncurated</rdfs:label>
As opposed to
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">uncurated</rdfs:label>
The latter lets us, in the future, add different language labels that
are understood as such.
I think the answer is "yes".
-Alan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Obi-devel mailing list
Obi-...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obi-devel
I agree with the modification as mentioned below, and Alan proposes to
include the change in our release, for the labels and all the annotation
properties that can have language specific text: definition,
example_of_usage, etc.
There was no objection to that earlier, so I would propose that unless
stated otherwise before Monday, that will be the adopted format for
release.
Thanks,
Melanie