From: Mike Malone <mjmal...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:56:37 -0700
Local: Fri, Mar 27 2009 3:56 am
Subject: Re: [oauth] Re: Is 4-legged OAuth possible?
Good post, Eran, but if you removed the token/consumer matching requirement
What if an application could request a limited use token (limited
Mike
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <e...@hueniverse.com>wrote:
> First, let's now get carried away with the leg count... I don't think
> I think your use case could be addressed in many way and the complexity
> You'll notice that while section 6.3.2 (Core 1.0) explicitly requires that
> This is a question of managing expectations more than anything else (when a
> While it would be great to have a way to keep the chain of control active
> EHL
> More thought on my blog
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Hi,
> > I recently integrated Twitter's OAuth into my site, http://tipjoy.com
> > It's a great user experience and a lot like Facebook Connect.
> > But I ran into a problem when developing our API for Twitter
> > How can we power this 4-legged OAuth? Twitter could act as an
> > I'm told Facebook is coming up with a solution for Facebook Connect.
> > What do you all think?
> > Thanks,
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||