Received: by 10.115.81.10 with SMTP id i10mr440639wal.28.1272463509970;
        Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: oai-ore@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.115.135.31 with SMTP id m31ls49757557wan.1.p; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 
	07:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.115.2.12 with SMTP id e12mr1497468wai.0.1272463508456;
        Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.115.2.12 with SMTP id e12mr1497467wai.0.1272463508431;
        Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <hvds...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-gw0-f51.google.com (mail-gw0-f51.google.com [74.125.83.51])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 35si1348464wac.1.2010.04.28.07.05.07;
        Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of hvds...@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.51 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.83.51;
Received: by mail-gw0-f51.google.com with SMTP id 19so1649915gwb.10
        for <oai-ore@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.119.41 with SMTP id r41mr6637344ybc.345.1272463506724;
        Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <hvds...@gmail.com>
Received: from [10.25.67.95] (72-255-32-182.client.stsn.net [72.255.32.182])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm3096631gxk.0.2010.04.28.07.05.05
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
References: <q2tf032cc061004280041u48d17416reb03dfa9ca8afd51@mail.gmail.com> <5029BE6A-B749-4614-9421-FA88D02803C1@gmail.com> <s2xf032cc061004280334h4ddbb2a6i9c8fbc4750f8a013@mail.gmail.com> <B03787BC-6EC5-4BB0-A9CC-7004699F22CE@gmail.com> <l2of032cc061004280629m5fec21b6u31e842ca63ae72b3@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <BCA5AD8A-6732-4EAA-880B-053922FF85E2@gmail.com>
From: Herbert Van de Sompel <hvds...@gmail.com>
To: "oai-ore@googlegroups.com" <oai-ore@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <l2of032cc061004280629m5fec21b6u31e842ca63ae72b3@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (7B367)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 7B367)
Subject: Re: atom feeds as resource maps
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:06:09 -0400
Cc: "oai-ore@googlegroups.com" <oai-ore@googlegroups.com>
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: 
	domain of hvds...@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.51 as permitted sender) 
	smtp.mail=hvds...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
X-Original-Sender: hvds...@gmail.com
Reply-To: oai-ore@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list oai-ore@googlegroups.com; contact oai-ore+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <oai-ore.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/post?hl=en_US>, 
	<mailto:oai-ore@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:oai-ore+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore?hl=en_US>
Sender: oai-ore@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/subscribe?hl=en_US>, 
	<mailto:oai-ore+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/subscribe?hl=en_US>, 
	<mailto:oai-ore+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ed

I think that Figure1 of http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/atom gives a go=
od perspective of how an ORE Resource Map relates to an Atom entry.

Note that in an early version of the Atom serialization for ORE, a Resource=
 Map was mapped onto an Atom feed with each Atom entry holding a single Agg=
regated Resource. This was fundamentally revised (by popular demand) to map=
 a Resource Map to an Atom entry.  =20

Cheers

Herbert =20

Sent from my iPad

On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Ed Summers <e...@pobox.com> wrote:

> OK, so the answer to my original (admittedly vague) question:
>=20
> """
> Does the constraint in the Data Model that a Resource Map MUST
> describe a single Aggregation [1] prevent someone from using an Atom
> *Feed* (containing multiple atom:entry elements) as a OAI-ORE Resource
> Map?
> """
>=20
> is Yes.
>=20
> In terms of webarch: a web resource that has an application/atom+xml
> representation, which contains an atom:feed root element and multiple
> child atom:entry elements can not a be considered a Resource Map. The
> URI for the feed can't be the URI for the Resource Map. The atom feed
> just references Resource Maps (w/ link rel=3D"self" in the atom:entry
> elements).
>=20
> The requirement instead is that an application/atom+xml representation
> for a Resource Map should have an atom:entry root element?
>=20
> Is that about right?
>=20
> //Ed
>=20
> --=20
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups=
 "OAI-ORE" group.
> To post to this group, send email to oai-ore@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to oai-ore+unsubscribe@googleg=
roups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oai-=
ore?hl=3Den.
>=20

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
OAI-ORE" group.
To post to this group, send email to oai-ore@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to oai-ore+unsubscribe@googlegro=
ups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oai-or=
e?hl=3Den.